Suppr超能文献

澳大拉西亚人类遗传学学会立场声明:多基因分数在临床实践和人群健康中的应用。

Human Genetics Society of Australasia Position Statement: Use of Polygenic Scores in Clinical Practice and Population Health.

机构信息

Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Twin Res Hum Genet. 2023 Feb;26(1):40-48. doi: 10.1017/thg.2023.10. Epub 2023 Mar 23.

Abstract

Considerable progress continues to be made with regards to the value and use of disease associated polygenic scores (PGS). PGS aim to capture a person's genetic liability to a condition, disease, or a trait, combining information across many risk variants and incorporating their effect sizes. They are already available for clinicians and consumers to order in Australasia. However, debate is ongoing over the readiness of this information for integration into clinical practice and population health. This position statement provides the viewpoint of the Human Genetics Society of Australasia (HGSA) regarding the clinical application of disease-associated PGS in both individual patients and population health. The statement details how PGS are calculated, highlights their breadth of possible application, and examines their current challenges and limitations. We consider fundamental lessons from Mendelian genetics and their continuing relevance to PGS, while also acknowledging the distinct elements of PGS. Use of PGS in practice should be evidence based, and the evidence for the associated benefit, while rapidly emerging, remains limited. Given that clinicians and consumers can already order PGS, their current limitations and key issues warrant consideration. PGS can be developed for most complex conditions and traits and can be used across multiple clinical settings and for population health. The HGSA's view is that further evaluation, including regulatory, implementation and health system evaluation are required before PGS can be routinely implemented in the Australasian healthcare system.

摘要

在疾病相关多基因评分 (PGS) 的价值和应用方面,不断取得重大进展。PGS 旨在捕捉一个人对疾病、病症或特征的遗传易感性,结合许多风险变异的信息并纳入其效应大小。它们已经在澳大拉西亚地区供临床医生和消费者订购。然而,对于将这些信息整合到临床实践和人群健康中是否已经做好准备,仍存在争议。本立场声明提供了澳大拉西亚人类遗传学学会 (HGSA) 对个体患者和人群健康中疾病相关 PGS 的临床应用的观点。该声明详细说明了 PGS 的计算方法,突出了其广泛的可能应用,并研究了它们当前的挑战和局限性。我们考虑了孟德尔遗传学的基本教训及其对 PGS 的持续相关性,同时也承认了 PGS 的独特元素。PGS 的实际应用应该基于证据,而相关益处的证据虽然正在迅速出现,但仍然有限。鉴于临床医生和消费者已经可以订购 PGS,因此目前的局限性和关键问题值得考虑。PGS 可以为大多数复杂的疾病和特征开发,并可在多个临床环境中用于人群健康。HGSA 的观点是,在 PGS 可以在澳大拉西亚医疗保健系统中常规实施之前,需要进一步进行评估,包括监管、实施和卫生系统评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验