Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE), Hosted at U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA, USA.
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA, USA.
SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2023 Mar;34(3):183-210. doi: 10.1080/1062936X.2023.2188608. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
Pesticides, pharmaceuticals, and other organic contaminants often undergo hydrolysis when released into the environment; therefore, measured or estimated hydrolysis rates are needed to assess their environmental persistence. An intuitive multiple linear regression (MLR) approach was used to develop robust QSARs for predicting base-catalyzed rate constants of carboxylic acid esters (CAEs) and lactones. We explored various combinations of independent descriptors, resulting in four primary models (two for lactones and two for CAEs), with a total of 15 and 11 parameters included in the CAE and lactone QSAR models, respectively. The most significant descriptors include p, electronegativity, charge density, and steric parameters. Model performance is assessed using Drug Theoretics and Cheminformatics Laboratory's DTC-QSAR tool, demonstrating high accuracy for both internal validation ( = 0.93 and RMSE = 0.41-0.43 for CAEs; = 0.90-0.93 and RMSE = 0.38-0.46 for lactones) and external validation ( = 0.93 and RMSE = 0.43-0.45 for CAEs; = 0.94-0.98 and RMSE = 0.33-0.41 for lactones). The developed models require only low-cost computational resources and have substantially improved performance compared to existing hydrolysis rate prediction models (HYDROWIN and SPARC).
农药、药品和其他有机污染物在释放到环境中后通常会发生水解;因此,需要测量或估计水解速率,以评估它们在环境中的持久性。本研究采用直观的多元线性回归(MLR)方法,建立了用于预测羧酸酯(CAE)和内酯的碱性催化水解速率常数的稳健定量构效关系(QSAR)。我们探索了各种独立描述符的组合,得到了四个主要模型(两个用于内酯,两个用于 CAE),CAE 和内酯 QSAR 模型中分别包含 15 个和 11 个参数。最重要的描述符包括 p、电负性、电荷密度和立体参数。使用 Drug Theoretics and Cheminformatics Laboratory 的 DTC-QSAR 工具评估模型性能,结果表明,内部验证(CAE 的 = 0.93 和 RMSE = 0.41-0.43;内酯的 = 0.90-0.93 和 RMSE = 0.38-0.46)和外部验证(CAE 的 = 0.93 和 RMSE = 0.43-0.45;内酯的 = 0.94-0.98 和 RMSE = 0.33-0.41)的准确性都很高。所开发的模型仅需要低成本的计算资源,并且与现有的水解速率预测模型(HYDROWIN 和 SPARC)相比,性能有了显著提高。