Department of Veterans Affairs.
Fam Syst Health. 2023 Mar;41(1):1-6. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000789.
"Why should I care about doing Measurement-Based Care (MBC)?" This is a phrase that the editor often hears, either explicitly or implied, when working to champion and implement MBC within integrated primary care (IPC) settings. As an implementation and education specialist within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) healthcare system, the editor has attended many MBC presentations and meetings where this question is uttered by frontline IPC clinicians, often frustrated with the growing demands on their practice. Many of these sentiments are usually framed around the assumption that MBC is not very important or useful, clinically speaking. This sets up a familiar debate of research versus practice: While many clinicians have heard MBC is "good for us," what accounts for the failure to implement MBC clinically? One of the major aims of this guest editorial is to invite the reader to consider the evidence base we have so far, rethink perceived barriers to MBC, and to ultimately decide for oneself that "the juice is worth the squeeze" for routine clinical practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
“我为什么要关心实施基于测量的医疗照护(MBC)?”编辑在倡导并在综合性初级医疗保健(IPC)环境中实施 MBC 时,经常听到或明或暗的这种说法。作为退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)医疗保健系统中的实施和教育专家,编辑参加了许多 MBC 演示和会议,IPC 临床医生在这些会议上经常会表达这种挫败感,因为他们的实践面临着越来越多的要求。这些情绪通常是基于 MBC 在临床方面并不那么重要或有用的假设。这就引发了一个熟悉的研究与实践的争论:虽然许多临床医生已经听说 MBC 对我们有好处,但为什么没有在临床上实施 MBC 呢?本特邀社论的主要目的之一是邀请读者考虑我们迄今为止的证据基础,重新思考对 MBC 的感知障碍,最终自己决定 MBC 对常规临床实践来说是“值得的”。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。