College of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas.
Optom Vis Sci. 2023 May 1;100(5):299-303. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000002014. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
Wavefront-guided scleral lenses (WGSLs) reduce visually debilitating residual higher-order aberrations. Although reduced higher-order aberrations lead to improvement in monocular high-contrast visual acuity (VA), the success of the lenses in everyday life depends on additional factors such as retinal contrast, binocular balance, and stereoacuity.
This report describes a case where WGSLs provided improved monocular vision compared with scleral lenses (SLs) but reduced binocularity and stereoacuity.
A 48-year-old woman with moderate keratoconus right eye (OD) and severe left eye (OS) was fitted with SLs and WGSLs. Visual acuity with best SLs was 20/20 -2 OD and 20/25 -2 OS. Residual higher-order root-mean-square (HORMS) wavefront error (6 mm pupil) was 0.56 μm OD and 1.38 μm OS. Visual acuity with WGSLs was 20/16 -2 OD and 20/25 +2 OS, and residual HORMS was 0.41 μm OD and 0.98 μm OS. Monocularly, WGSLs were reported to provide better VA. However, binocularly, the patient reported an "imbalanced feeling" and preferred the SLs over WGSLs. Binocular VA at distance was 20/25 with SLs and 20/25 -2 with WGSL. To investigate, the Worth Four-Dot test was performed, and the outcomes reported fusion with SLs but suppression OS at distance with WGSLs. Stereoacuity was 160 arc seconds at near and 120 arc seconds at distance with SLs and 400 arc seconds at near and >1200 arc seconds at distance with WGSLs. Dichoptic contrast balancing showed a balance point of 0.48 with SLs and 0.17 with WGSLs, indicating a strong preference toward OD. Simulation of the patient's retinal image revealed a greater difference in image contrast between the two eyes with WGSLs.
Wavefront-guided scleral lenses reduced HORMS and improved VA compared with SLs. However, in this case, it inadvertently caused binocular imbalance. As WGSLs become more widely available, future work should include methods to optimize binocular balance to maximize overall patient satisfaction.
波前引导巩膜镜片(WGSL)可减少视觉上令人衰弱的高阶像差残余。虽然降低高阶像差会导致单眼高对比度视力(VA)改善,但镜片在日常生活中的成功取决于其他因素,如视网膜对比度、双眼平衡和立体锐度。
本报告描述了一例 WGSL 提供的单眼视力改善优于巩膜镜(SL)但双眼视力和立体锐度降低的情况。
一名 48 岁女性,右眼(OD)中度圆锥角膜,左眼(OS)严重,右眼(OS)配 SL 和 WGSL。最佳 SL 视力为 20/20 -2 OD 和 20/25 -2 OS。残余高阶均方根(HORMS)波前误差(6mm 瞳孔)为 0.56μm OD 和 1.38μm OS。WGSL 视力为 20/16 -2 OD 和 20/25 +2 OS,残余 HORMS 为 0.41μm OD 和 0.98μm OS。单眼时,WGSL 报告提供更好的 VA。然而,双眼时,患者报告“不平衡感”,并更喜欢 SL 而不是 WGSL。双眼远距视力为 SLs 时为 20/25,WGSL 时为 20/25 -2。为了进行调查,进行了 Worth Four-Dot 测试,结果报告在 SL 时融合,但在 WGSL 时 OS 抑制。近立体视锐度为 SLs 时为 160 弧秒,SLs 时为 120 弧秒,WGSL 时为 400 弧秒,WGSL 时> 1200 弧秒。双眼对比平衡显示 SLs 的平衡点为 0.48,WGSL 的平衡点为 0.17,表明对 OD 的强烈偏好。对患者视网膜图像的模拟显示,使用 WGSL 时两眼之间的图像对比度差异更大。
与 SL 相比,波前引导巩膜镜片可降低 HORMS 并提高 VA。然而,在这种情况下,它无意中导致了双眼不平衡。随着 WGSL 的广泛应用,未来的工作应该包括优化双眼平衡的方法,以最大限度地提高患者的整体满意度。