Carey T S, Fletcher S W, Fletcher R, Earp J
Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27514.
Med Care. 1987 Apr;25(4):267-75. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198704000-00001.
Social Security spends $135 million yearly, contracting with physicians to provide consultative examinations for disability applicants. However, little is known about who these physicians are or how they view the determination of impairment. We surveyed a random sample of 153 physicians from North Carolina who performed consultative examinations for the North Carolina Disability Determinations Agency in 1983 (the consultative group), and a randomly selected group of 165 physicians of similar medical specialties (the comparison group). Response rates were 75% for the consultative group and 66% for the comparison group. Most consultative physicians (63%) performed fewer than 6 examinations per month. Characteristics of the consultative physicians were similar to the comparison group. Both groups were skeptical of the claims of disability applicants; 48% of the consultative and 55% of the comparison group thought that a majority of applicants could be employed. Of the consultative physicians, 53% indicated that they had learned little about disability programs from any source. Most consultative physicians (58%) judged it "almost impossible" to determine impairment on the basis of a single office examination. However, consultative physicians were less likely than the comparison group to view Social Security as difficult to work with (25% vs. 54%; P less than 0.01). Agencies that determine disability ask physicians to perform a task for which they feel ill prepared and have little special knowledge.
社会保障局每年花费1.35亿美元,与医生签约,为残疾申请人提供咨询检查。然而,对于这些医生是谁以及他们如何看待损伤判定,人们知之甚少。我们对1983年为北卡罗来纳州残疾判定机构进行咨询检查的153名北卡罗来纳州医生的随机样本(咨询组),以及随机挑选的165名具有相似医学专业的医生组(对照组)进行了调查。咨询组的回复率为75%,对照组为66%。大多数咨询医生(63%)每月进行的检查少于6次。咨询医生的特征与对照组相似。两组都对残疾申请人的说法持怀疑态度;48%的咨询组医生和55%的对照组医生认为大多数申请人可以就业。在咨询医生中,53%表示他们从任何渠道对残疾项目了解甚少。大多数咨询医生(58%)认为仅凭一次门诊检查“几乎不可能”判定损伤。然而,与对照组相比,咨询医生认为社会保障局难以合作的可能性较小(25%对54%;P<0.01)。判定残疾的机构要求医生执行一项他们觉得准备不足且几乎没有专业知识的任务。