• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项回顾性研究,旨在评估海氏法则、药物性肝损伤急性肝衰竭(DrILTox ALF)评分、罗伯斯-迪亚兹模型以及一种新的逻辑回归模型对中国药物性肝损伤患者急性肝衰竭的预测能力。

A retrospective study to evaluate Hy's Law, DrILTox ALF score, Robles-Diaz model, and a new logistic regression model for predicting acute liver failure in Chinese patients with drug-induced liver injury.

作者信息

Xiong Xiaomei, Xu Qing, Wang Bin

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Department of Pharmacy, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2024 Feb;23(2):207-211. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2023.2195624. Epub 2023 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1080/14740338.2023.2195624
PMID:36958375
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate Hy's law, DrILTox ALF Score, Robles-Diaz Model, and a new logistic regression model for predicting acute liver failure (ALF) in Chinese patients with drug-induced liver injury (DILI).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study among 514 hospitalized DILI patients from 2011 to 2020. Logistic regression analysis was used to develop a predictive model for ALF. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of these models were compared. Another 304 DILI patients were used for external validation.

OUTCOMES

Twenty-six of 514 DILI patients progressed to ALF. Among these models, Hy's law had 84.6% sensitivity, 59.8% specificity, 10.1% PPV, and 98.6% NPV. DrILTox ALF Score had 92.3% sensitivity, 51.8% specificity, 9.3% PPV, and 99.2% NPV, while Robles-Diaz Model had 50.0% sensitivity, 77.7% specificity, 10.7% PPV, and 96.7% NPV. The logistic regression model described as  = 1/(1+e ) had 88.5% sensitivity, 73.1% specificity, 16.3% PPV, and 99.1% NPV at the cut-off of 0.04778 and kept 94.4% sensitivity, 66.8% specificity, 15.2% PPV, and 99.5% NPV in external validation.

CONCLUSIONS

The logistic regression model provided superior performance than Hy's law, DrILTox ALF Score, and Robles-Diaz Model for predicting DILI -related ALF.

摘要

目的

评估海氏法则、DrILTox急性肝衰竭评分、罗伯斯 - 迪亚兹模型以及一种新的逻辑回归模型对中国药物性肝损伤(DILI)患者急性肝衰竭(ALF)的预测能力。

方法

我们对2011年至2020年期间514例住院DILI患者进行了一项回顾性研究。采用逻辑回归分析建立ALF预测模型。比较这些模型的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。另外304例DILI患者用于外部验证。

结果

514例DILI患者中有26例进展为ALF。在这些模型中,海氏法则的敏感性为84.6%,特异性为59.8%,PPV为10.1%,NPV为98.6%。DrILTox急性肝衰竭评分的敏感性为92.3%,特异性为51.8%,PPV为9.3%,NPV为99.2%,而罗伯斯 - 迪亚兹模型的敏感性为50.0%,特异性为77.7%,PPV为10.7%,NPV为96.7%。逻辑回归模型(描述为=1/(1 + e))在截断值为0.04778时敏感性为88.5%,特异性为73.1%,PPV为16.3%,NPV为99.1%,在外部验证中保持敏感性为94.4%,特异性为66.8%,PPV为15.2%,NPV为99.5%。

结论

在预测DILI相关的ALF方面,逻辑回归模型比海氏法则、DrILTox急性肝衰竭评分和罗伯斯 - 迪亚兹模型具有更优的性能。

相似文献

1
A retrospective study to evaluate Hy's Law, DrILTox ALF score, Robles-Diaz model, and a new logistic regression model for predicting acute liver failure in Chinese patients with drug-induced liver injury.一项回顾性研究,旨在评估海氏法则、药物性肝损伤急性肝衰竭(DrILTox ALF)评分、罗伯斯-迪亚兹模型以及一种新的逻辑回归模型对中国药物性肝损伤患者急性肝衰竭的预测能力。
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2024 Feb;23(2):207-211. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2023.2195624. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
2
Risk of Acute Liver Failure in Patients With Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Evaluation of Hy's Law and a New Prognostic Model.药物性肝损伤患者急性肝衰竭的风险:海氏法则及一种新的预后模型评估
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Dec;13(13):2360-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.06.020. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
3
Use of Hy's law and a new composite algorithm to predict acute liver failure in patients with drug-induced liver injury.应用 Hy's 法则和一种新的复合算法预测药物性肝损伤患者的急性肝衰竭。
Gastroenterology. 2014 Jul;147(1):109-118.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.03.050. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
4
Comparison of the prognostic models for mortality in idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury.特异质性药物性肝损伤死亡率预后模型的比较
Hepatol Int. 2023 Apr;17(2):488-498. doi: 10.1007/s12072-022-10405-9. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
5
Incidence of liver injury among cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in an integrated health system.在一个综合医疗系统中接受化疗的癌症患者肝损伤的发生率。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Apr;24(4):427-34. doi: 10.1002/pds.3757. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
6
Anti-tuberculosis drug-induced liver injury in Shanghai: validation of Hy's Law.上海地区抗结核药物性肝损伤:Hy's 法则的验证。
Drug Saf. 2014 Jan;37(1):43-51. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0119-6.
7
Refinement of Hy Law Using the Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network Database.利用药物性肝损伤网络数据库完善Hy法则
Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 18. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003145.
8
Incidence and Etiology of Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Mainland China.中国内地药物性肝损伤的发生率及病因学。
Gastroenterology. 2019 Jun;156(8):2230-2241.e11. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
9
Useful biomarkers for predicting poor prognosis of patients with drug-induced liver injury: A retrospective cohort study.预测药物性肝损伤患者预后不良的有用生物标志物:一项回顾性队列研究。
Am J Med Sci. 2025 Feb;369(2):218-227. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2024.08.019. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
10
Death and liver transplantation within 2 years of onset of drug-induced liver injury.药物性肝损伤发病后2年内的死亡及肝移植情况。
Hepatology. 2017 Oct;66(4):1275-1285. doi: 10.1002/hep.29283. Epub 2017 Aug 26.