McCreery Randy J, Lyden Elizabeth, Anderson Matthew, Van Schooneveld Trevor C
Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2023 Mar 2;3(1):e39. doi: 10.1017/ash.2023.123. eCollection 2023.
To demonstrate that a syndromic stewardship intervention can safely reduce antipseudomonal antibiotic use in the treatment of inpatient diabetic foot infections (DFIs).
From November 2017 through March 2018, we performed an antimicrobial stewardship intervention that included creation of a DFI best-practice guideline, implementation of an electronic medical record order set, and targeted education of key providers. We conducted a retrospective before-and-after study evaluating guideline adherent antipseudomonal antibiotic use 1 year before and after the intervention using interrupted time-series analysis.
University of Nebraska Medical Center, a 718-bed academic medical center in Omaha, Nebraska.
The study included 193 adults aged ≥19 years (105 in the preintervention group and 88 in the postintervention group) admitted to non-intensive care units whose primary reason for antibiotic treatment was diabetic foot infection (DFI).
Guideline-adherent use of antipseudomonal antibiotics increased from 39% before the intervention to 68% after the intervention (P ≤ .0001). Antipseudomonal antibiotic use decreased from 538 days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 DFI patient days (PD) before the intervention to 272 DOT per 1,000 DFI PD after the intervention (P < .0001), with a statistically significant decrease in both level of use and slope of change. We did not detect any changes in length of stay, readmission, amputation rate, subsequent positive Clostridioides difficile testing, or mortality.
Our 3-component intervention of guideline creation, implementation of an order set, and targeted education was associated with a significant decrease in antipseudomonal antibiotic use in the management of inpatient DFIs. DFIs are common and should be considered as opportunities for syndromic stewardship intervention.
证明综合管理干预措施可安全减少住院糖尿病足感染(DFI)治疗中抗假单胞菌抗生素的使用。
2017年11月至2018年3月,我们实施了一项抗菌药物管理干预措施,包括制定DFI最佳实践指南、实施电子病历医嘱集以及对关键医疗服务提供者进行针对性教育。我们进行了一项回顾性前后对照研究,采用中断时间序列分析评估干预前后1年遵循指南使用抗假单胞菌抗生素的情况。
内布拉斯加大学医学中心,位于内布拉斯加州奥马哈市,是一家拥有718张床位的学术医疗中心。
该研究纳入了193名年龄≥19岁的成年人(干预前组105人,干预后组88人),他们入住非重症监护病房,抗生素治疗的主要原因是糖尿病足感染(DFI)。
干预前遵循指南使用抗假单胞菌抗生素的比例为39%,干预后增至68%(P≤0.0001)。抗假单胞菌抗生素的使用天数从干预前每1000个DFI患者日(PD)538天治疗时长(DOT)降至干预后每1000个DFI PD 272天DOT(P<0.0001),使用水平和变化斜率均有统计学显著下降。我们未发现住院时间、再入院率、截肢率、后续艰难梭菌检测阳性或死亡率有任何变化。
我们创建指南、实施医嘱集和进行针对性教育的三部分干预措施,与住院DFI管理中抗假单胞菌抗生素使用的显著减少相关。DFI很常见,应被视为综合管理干预的机会。