• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭医生在 75 岁及以上伴有心房颤动的患者中预防卒中使用口服抗凝药物方面的处方实践和共同决策观点。

Family Physician Prescribing Practices and Perspectives on Shared Decision-Making Regarding the Use of Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Patients 75 Years or Older With Atrial Fibrillation.

机构信息

University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

出版信息

J Prim Care Community Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;14:21501319231164060. doi: 10.1177/21501319231164060.

DOI:10.1177/21501319231164060
PMID:36960556
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10041587/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is common in older adults, yet guideline-recommended oral anti-coagulants (OACs) for stroke prevention are underused in this population. With a growing population of older adults at risk of AF seeking primary care, the objective of the study was to determine the management practices and perspectives of family physicians on the initiation of OACs for stroke prevention in AF patients 75 years or older, including their engagement of patients in shared decision-making.

METHODS

This was an online survey of family physicians affiliated with a Primary Care Network in Alberta, Canada.

RESULTS

Patient's risk (of falls, bleeding, or stroke) was the most common factor (17/20, 85%) physicians considered when deciding to initiate OAC in older adult patients with AF. Physicians used the CHADS2VASC (13/14, 93%) and HASBLED (11/15, 73%) tools to determine stroke and bleeding risks, respectively. Majority (11/15, 73%) of the physicians agreed that they feel confident initiating OAC for AF patients ≥75, while 20% (3/15) were neutral. All physicians agreed that their patients participated in shared decision-making to initiate OAC for stroke prevention.

CONCLUSION

Family physicians strongly consider patient risks and utilize risk-assessment tools when initiating OAC in older adults with AF. Despite all physicians reporting the use of shared decision-making and that their patients were educated on the indications for OAC, confidence in initiating treatment was variable. Further exploration into factors impacting physician confidence is needed.

摘要

简介

心房颤动(AF)在老年人中很常见,但指南推荐的用于预防中风的口服抗凝剂(OAC)在该人群中的使用率较低。随着有发生 AF 风险的老年人口的增加,他们寻求初级保健,本研究的目的是确定家庭医生在 75 岁或以上的 AF 患者中启动 OAC 预防中风的管理实践和观点,包括他们在共同决策中使患者参与。

方法

这是一项针对加拿大艾伯塔省初级保健网络中家庭医生的在线调查。

结果

在决定为 AF 老年患者启动 OAC 时,患者的风险(跌倒、出血或中风)是医生考虑的最常见因素(17/20,85%)。医生使用 CHADS2VASC(13/14,93%)和 HASBLED(11/15,73%)工具分别确定中风和出血风险。大多数(11/15,73%)医生认为他们有信心为≥75 岁的 AF 患者启动 OAC,而 20%(3/15)则持中立态度。所有医生都同意他们的患者参与了启动 OAC 预防中风的共同决策。

结论

家庭医生在为 AF 老年患者启动 OAC 时,强烈考虑患者的风险并使用风险评估工具。尽管所有医生都报告说使用了共同决策,并且他们的患者接受了 OAC 适应证的教育,但启动治疗的信心存在差异。需要进一步探讨影响医生信心的因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97cf/10041587/36f481a7c4ca/10.1177_21501319231164060-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97cf/10041587/4491f082ccdc/10.1177_21501319231164060-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97cf/10041587/4aab72875dcd/10.1177_21501319231164060-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97cf/10041587/f0b64d9c7445/10.1177_21501319231164060-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97cf/10041587/181215c3fa7b/10.1177_21501319231164060-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97cf/10041587/36f481a7c4ca/10.1177_21501319231164060-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97cf/10041587/4491f082ccdc/10.1177_21501319231164060-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97cf/10041587/4aab72875dcd/10.1177_21501319231164060-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97cf/10041587/f0b64d9c7445/10.1177_21501319231164060-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97cf/10041587/181215c3fa7b/10.1177_21501319231164060-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97cf/10041587/36f481a7c4ca/10.1177_21501319231164060-fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Family Physician Prescribing Practices and Perspectives on Shared Decision-Making Regarding the Use of Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Patients 75 Years or Older With Atrial Fibrillation.家庭医生在 75 岁及以上伴有心房颤动的患者中预防卒中使用口服抗凝药物方面的处方实践和共同决策观点。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;14:21501319231164060. doi: 10.1177/21501319231164060.
2
Development of a shared decision-making tool to assist patients and clinicians with decisions on oral anticoagulant treatment for atrial fibrillation.开发一种共享决策工具,以协助患者和临床医生就心房颤动的口服抗凝治疗做出决策。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Dec;31(12):2261-72. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1096767. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
3
Exploring patient-provider decision-making for use of anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: Results of the INFORM-AF study.探讨房颤患者使用抗凝药预防卒中的医患决策:INFORM-AF 研究结果。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019 Apr;18(4):280-288. doi: 10.1177/1474515118812252. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
4
Use of oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation is highly variable and only weakly associated with estimated stroke risk: cross-sectional population database study.口服抗凝药在心房颤动中的使用差异很大,且与估计的中风风险仅有微弱关联:横断面人群数据库研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2014 Sep;20(3):181-9. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2013.852535. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
5
Use of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Older Adults with Atrial Fibrillation After Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性卒中后老年房颤患者口服抗凝治疗的应用
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Feb;65(2):241-248. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14688. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
6
Assessing the Appropriateness of Oral Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation in Advanced Frailty: Use of Stroke and Bleeding Risk-Prediction Models.评估老年衰弱患者心房颤动口服抗凝治疗的适宜性:卒中与出血风险预测模型的应用
J Frailty Aging. 2017;6(1):46-52. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2016.118.
7
Clinicians' views and experiences of prescribing oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: A qualitative meta-synthesis.临床医生对心房颤动中风预防中开具口服抗凝药物的看法和经验:定性荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2020 May 7;15(5):e0232484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232484. eCollection 2020.
8
Effect of Mailing Educational Material to Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Their Clinicians on Use of Oral Anticoagulants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.邮寄教育材料给房颤患者及其临床医生对口服抗凝药物使用的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2214321. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14321.
9
Influence of decision aids on oral anticoagulant prescribing among physicians: a randomised trial.决策辅助工具对医生开具口服抗凝药物的影响:一项随机试验。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2017 Sep;47(9):649-658. doi: 10.1111/eci.12786. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
10
Managing older people with atrial fibrillation and preventing stroke: a review of anticoagulation approaches.管理老年房颤患者并预防中风:抗凝治疗方法综述
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2023 Jul-Dec;21(12):963-983. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2023.2276892. Epub 2023 Dec 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiology and impact of frailty in patients with atrial fibrillation in Europe.欧洲心房颤动患者衰弱的流行病学和影响。
Age Ageing. 2022 Aug 2;51(8). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac192.
2
The 2020 CCS atrial fibrillation guidelines for pharmacists: Top 10 takeaways.2020年药剂师CCS心房颤动指南:十大要点
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2021 Nov 17;155(2):107-118. doi: 10.1177/17151635211058160. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.
3
Potential benefits of pharmacist intervention in the detection and therapy of atrial fibrillation.药剂师干预在心房颤动检测和治疗中的潜在益处。
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2021 Jun 13;154(4):240-241. doi: 10.1177/17151635211019963. eCollection 2021 Jul-Aug.
4
Atrial fibrillation risk factors in patients with ischemic stroke.缺血性脑卒中患者的房颤危险因素
Arch Med Sci. 2019 Apr 5;17(1):19-24. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2019.84212. eCollection 2021.
5
Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Elderly (≥85 years) Patients With Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation: Changing Clinical Practice and Outcomes for Stroke Prevention in a Nationwide Cohort Study.非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝药在新诊断的心房颤动老年(≥85 岁)患者中的应用:一项全国性队列研究中预防卒中的临床实践和结局的改变。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2021 Jan;96(1):52-65. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.08.042.
6
Shared decision-making in atrial fibrillation: patient-reported involvement in treatment decisions.心房颤动的共同决策:患者参与治疗决策的报告。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2020 Oct 1;6(4):263-272. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaa040.
7
Frailty and atrial fibrillation: A systematic review.衰弱与心房颤动:系统评价。
Eur J Intern Med. 2018 Oct;56:33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2018.04.018. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
8
Age-Related Differences in Presentation, Treatment, and Outcome of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in Europe: The EORP-AF General Pilot Registry (EURObservational Research Programme-Atrial Fibrillation).欧洲心房颤动患者在临床表现、治疗及转归方面的年龄相关差异:EORP-AF通用试点注册研究(欧洲观察性研究计划-心房颤动)
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Aug;1(4):326-334. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2015.02.019. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
9
Shared decision making in preventive health care: What it is; what it is not.预防性医疗保健中的共同决策:是什么;不是什么。
Can Fam Physician. 2017 Sep;63(9):682-684.
10
How do family medicine residents choose an anticoagulation regimen for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?家庭医学住院医师如何为非瓣膜性心房颤动患者选择抗凝治疗方案?
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017 Sep;18(5):472-481. doi: 10.1017/S1463423617000196. Epub 2017 May 3.