Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom.
Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, England, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2020 May 7;15(5):e0232484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232484. eCollection 2020.
Globally, over 33 million people have atrial fibrillation (AF). In eligible patients, oral anticoagulation (OAC) is recommended for stroke risk reduction. Despite recent increases in OAC prescribing, global under-prescription to high-risk AF patients and inappropriate prescription to low-risk patients is leading to unnecessary risk of stroke and haemorrhage. This meta-synthesis explored clinicians' beliefs and experiences regarding OAC prescription to AF patients, highlighting barriers to stroke prevention and informing future clinician-focused interventions.
A qualitative meta-synthesis exploring clinicians' views and experiences of prescribing OACs for stroke prevention in AF patients. Databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO and CINAHL were searched to June 2018, with a further Medline search to February 2020. Thematic synthesis was performed with data coding, descriptive theme categorisation and generation of analytical themes. From 3499 records, 101 full text papers were screened, with 13 eligible studies identified. Four analytical themes were found to affect clinicians' prescribing: (i) 'Clinicians' intellectual and emotional responses to the evidence'; (ii) 'Prescribing in primary and secondary care'; (iii) 'Clinicians' views of how patients' characteristics and opinions influence prescribing'; and (iv) 'Clinicians' views on their interactions with patients'.
This review highlights focal points for future clinician-focused interventions to improve guideline-adherent OAC prescription in AF patients. Interventions should aim to improve clinicians' knowledge around NOAC prescription and stroke and haemorrhage risk assessment tools as well as their emotional responses to difficult prescribing scenarios. Multidisciplinary interventions promoting cohesive care and input from different clinicians to overcome time-related barriers may increase guideline-adherent OAC prescription for AF patients.
全球有超过 3300 万人患有心房颤动(AF)。在符合条件的患者中,推荐使用口服抗凝剂(OAC)来降低中风风险。尽管最近 OAC 的处方量有所增加,但全球对高危 AF 患者的处方不足和对低危患者的处方不当,导致不必要的中风和出血风险。这项荟萃分析探讨了临床医生对 AF 患者 OAC 处方的信念和经验,强调了预防中风的障碍,并为未来以临床医生为重点的干预措施提供了信息。
一项定性荟萃分析,探讨了临床医生对 AF 患者预防中风使用 OAC 处方的观点和经验。检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsychINFO 和 CINAHL 等数据库,截至 2018 年 6 月,并于 2020 年 2 月进行了进一步的 Medline 检索。对数据进行编码、描述性主题分类和分析主题生成,进行主题综合。从 3499 条记录中筛选出 101 篇全文论文,确定了 13 项符合条件的研究。发现有四个分析主题影响临床医生的处方:(i)“临床医生对证据的智力和情感反应”;(ii)“初级和二级保健中的处方”;(iii)“临床医生对患者特征和意见如何影响处方的看法”;和(iv)“临床医生对与患者互动的看法”。
本综述强调了未来以临床医生为重点的干预措施的重点,以改善 AF 患者遵循指南的 OAC 处方。干预措施应旨在提高临床医生对 NOAC 处方和中风及出血风险评估工具的了解,以及他们对困难处方情况的情感反应。促进连贯护理的多学科干预措施和不同临床医生的投入,以克服与时间相关的障碍,可能会增加 AF 患者遵循指南的 OAC 处方。