• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估儿科姑息治疗中的幸福感:一项关于儿童、家长和健康专业人员观点的试点研究。

Assessing well-being in pediatric palliative care: A pilot study about views of children, parents and health professionals.

作者信息

Toro-Pérez Daniel, Camprodon-Rosanas Ester, Navarro Vilarrubí Sergi, Bolancé Catalina, Guillen Montserrat, Limonero Joaquín T

机构信息

School of Psychology, Stress and Health Research Group, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Children and Adolescent Mental Health Research Group, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology, Sant Joan de Déu Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Palliat Support Care. 2024 Oct;22(5):1000-1008. doi: 10.1017/S1478951523000251.

DOI:10.1017/S1478951523000251
PMID:36960600
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Our research aims to compare the perception that children in the pediatric palliative care setting have of their emotional well-being, or that expressed by the parents, with the perception held by the professionals involved in their care.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, the emotional well-being of 30 children with a mean age of 10.8 years (standard deviation [SD] = 6.1) is evaluated. Children, or parents where necessary, evaluate their situation with a question about emotional well-being on a 0-10 visual analog scale. For each child, a health professional also rates the child's emotional status using the same scale.

RESULTS

The average child's emotional well-being score provided by children or parents was 7.1 (SD = 1.6), while the average score given by health professionals was 5.6 (SD = 1.2). Children or parents graded the children's emotional well-being significantly higher than professionals (-test = 4.6, -value < .001). Health professionals rated the children's emotional well-being significantly lower when the disease status was progressive than when the disease was not (-test = 2.2, -value = .037).

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

Children themselves, or their parents, report more positive evaluations of emotional well-being than health professionals. Sociodemographic and disease variables do not seem to have a direct influence on this perception, rather it is more likely that children, parents, and professionals focus on different aspects and that children or parents need to hold on to a more optimistic vision. We must emphasize that when this difference is more pronounced, it can be a warning sign that further analysis is required of the situation.

摘要

目的

我们的研究旨在比较儿科姑息治疗环境中儿童对自身情绪健康的认知、或父母所表达的认知,与参与其护理的专业人员的认知。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,对30名平均年龄为10.8岁(标准差[SD]=6.1)的儿童的情绪健康状况进行评估。儿童或必要时的父母,通过在0至10的视觉模拟量表上回答一个关于情绪健康的问题来评估他们的状况。对于每个儿童,一名健康专业人员也使用相同的量表对该儿童的情绪状态进行评分。

结果

儿童或父母给出的儿童情绪健康平均得分为7.1(SD=1.6),而健康专业人员给出的平均得分为5.6(SD=1.2)。儿童或父母对儿童情绪健康的评分显著高于专业人员(t检验=4.6,P值<0.001)。当疾病状态为进展期时,健康专业人员对儿童情绪健康的评分显著低于疾病非进展期时(t检验=2.2,P值=0.037)。

结果的意义

儿童自身或其父母对情绪健康的评价比健康专业人员更积极。社会人口统计学和疾病变量似乎对这种认知没有直接影响,更有可能的是儿童、父母和专业人员关注的是不同方面,并且儿童或父母需要保持更乐观的看法。我们必须强调,当这种差异更为明显时,可能是一个警示信号,表明需要对这种情况进行进一步分析。

相似文献

1
Assessing well-being in pediatric palliative care: A pilot study about views of children, parents and health professionals.评估儿科姑息治疗中的幸福感:一项关于儿童、家长和健康专业人员观点的试点研究。
Palliat Support Care. 2024 Oct;22(5):1000-1008. doi: 10.1017/S1478951523000251.
2
Healthcare users' experiences of communicating with healthcare professionals about children who have life-limiting conditions: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医疗保健使用者就患有危及生命疾病的儿童与医疗保健专业人员沟通的经历:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):33-42. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2413.
3
Listening to parents: The role of symptom perception in pediatric palliative home care.倾听父母心声:症状感知在儿科姑息家庭护理中的作用
Palliat Support Care. 2016 Feb;14(1):13-9. doi: 10.1017/S1478951515000462. Epub 2015 May 22.
4
Family pain history predicts child health status in children with chronic rheumatic disease.家族疼痛史可预测慢性风湿性疾病患儿的健康状况。
Pediatrics. 2001 Sep;108(3):E47. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.3.e47.
5
Evaluating quality of life in pediatric palliative care: a cross-sectional analysis of children's and parents' perspectives.评估儿科姑息治疗中的生活质量:儿童和家长观点的横断面分析。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Mar;183(3):1305-1314. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05330-4. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
6
How do professionals assess the quality of life of children with advanced cancer receiving palliative care, and what are their recommendations for improvement?专业人员如何评估接受姑息治疗的晚期癌症儿童的生活质量,以及他们对改善的建议是什么?
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 May 8;17(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0328-y.
7
Reiki intervention for supporting healthcare professional care behaviors in pediatric palliative care: A pilot study.灵气干预支持儿科姑息治疗中医疗保健专业人员的护理行为:一项试点研究。
Palliat Support Care. 2024 Jun;22(3):493-498. doi: 10.1017/S1478951523001852.
8
The experiences of acute non-surgical pain of children who present to a healthcare facility for treatment: a systematic review protocol.前往医疗机构接受治疗的儿童急性非手术疼痛经历:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):12-20. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2466.
9
[Efficacy of the Paediatrics Palliative Care Team of Murcia according to the experience of the parents].[根据家长的经验看穆尔西亚儿科姑息治疗团队的疗效]
An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2020 Jul;93(1):4-15. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
10
Going against patients' will? A qualitative study of how palliative health-care professionals handle competing considerations when children are excluded from parental illness and death.违背患者意愿?一项定性研究,探讨姑息治疗保健专业人员在排除儿童参与父母疾病和死亡时如何处理相互竞争的考虑因素。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2020 Dec;49:101839. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101839. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating quality of life in pediatric palliative care: a cross-sectional analysis of children's and parents' perspectives.评估儿科姑息治疗中的生活质量:儿童和家长观点的横断面分析。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Mar;183(3):1305-1314. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05330-4. Epub 2023 Dec 19.