From the Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit (Thomaidou, Blythe, Peerdeman, van Laarhoven, Van Schothorst, Veldhuijzen, Evers), Leiden University; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition (Thomaidou, Blythe, Peerdeman, van Laarhoven, Van Schothorst, Veldhuijzen, Evers); Medical Delta Healthy Society Leiden University, TU Delft, and Erasmus University (Evers); and Department of Psychiatry (Evers), Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Psychosom Med. 2023 May 1;85(4):308-321. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000001194. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
In past decades, the field of nocebo research has focused on studying how sensory perception can be shaped by learning. Nocebo effects refer to aggravated sensory experiences or increased sensitivity to sensations such as pain and itch resulting from treatment-related negative experiences. Behavioral conditioning and verbal suggestions of a negative treatment outcome may aggravate pain and itch perception. Gaining a comprehensive view of the magnitude of nocebo effects and contributing factors will help steer nocebo research toward fruitful directions for understanding complex sensory phenomena.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of a total of 37 distinct experimental nocebo studies on healthy participants (all published in English between 2008 and 2021), with four separate meta-analyses for nocebo effects on pain or itch. We conducted subgroup analyses and meta-regression on factors such as type and intensity of sensory stimuli, and length of conditioning paradigms.
This meta-analysis showed that, on average, effect sizes of nocebo effects were moderate to large (Hedges g between 0.26 and 0.71 for the four primary outcomes). The combination of conditioning and verbal suggestions yielded stronger nocebo responses on pain in particular. Subgroup analyses, including factors such as the type of sensory stimulation, did not explain the moderate heterogeneity in nocebo magnitudes between different studies. Risk of bias was generally low and was not related to nocebo magnitudes either.
We discuss these results in relation to the role of conditioning and aversive learning, and we recommend more consistency in designing and reporting nocebo experiments.
在过去几十年中,非安慰剂效应研究领域的重点一直放在研究感官知觉如何通过学习来塑造。非安慰剂效应是指由于与治疗相关的负面经历而导致的感官体验恶化或对疼痛和瘙痒等感觉的敏感性增加。行为条件作用和对负面治疗结果的口头暗示可能会加重疼痛和瘙痒的感知。全面了解非安慰剂效应的程度和影响因素将有助于引导非安慰剂研究朝着理解复杂感官现象的富有成效的方向发展。
我们对 2008 年至 2021 年间发表的 37 项关于健康参与者的独立实验性非安慰剂研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,其中对疼痛或瘙痒的非安慰剂效应进行了四项单独的荟萃分析。我们对影响因素(如感官刺激的类型和强度、条件作用范式的长度)进行了亚组分析和元回归分析。
荟萃分析显示,非安慰剂效应的平均效应大小为中等至较大(四个主要结局的 Hedges g 在 0.26 至 0.71 之间)。尤其是在条件作用和口头暗示的共同作用下,非安慰剂对疼痛的反应更强烈。包括感官刺激类型在内的亚组分析并不能解释不同研究中非安慰剂效应程度的中等异质性。偏倚风险总体较低,与非安慰剂效应的程度也没有关系。
我们讨论了这些结果与条件作用和厌恶学习的关系,并建议在设计和报告非安慰剂实验时更加一致。