Suppr超能文献

“他们会说你想让他们的家园消亡”:一项混合方法研究,旨在评估乌干达北部南苏丹难民及当地居民伴侣使用现代计划生育方法的情况。

"They will say you want to make their home die": A mixed methods study to assess modern family planning use in partnered South Sudanese refugee and host populations in Northern Uganda.

作者信息

Singh Neha S, Prabhakar Pallavi, Ssali Agnes, Namakula Sylvia, Namatovu Josephine, Kapiti Rogers, Kasiri Joram, Mounier-Jack Sandra

机构信息

Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

Independent Evaluation and Research Cell, BRAC Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Jun 30;2(6):e0000348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000348. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

The unmet need for family planning among conflict-affected populations is high globally, leaving girls and women vulnerable to unintended pregnancies and poor sexual and reproductive health outcomes. Ours is the first known mixed-methods study to assess the use of modern family planning (FP) methods amongst married or partnered South Sudanese refugee and host populations in Northern Uganda and to explore differences between them. We conducted a cross-sectional survey in July 2019 which included 1,533 partnered women of reproductive age (15-49 years) from host and South Sudanese refugee communities in Kiryandongo and Arua. Qualitative data were collected in October 2019-January 2020 via 34 focus group discussions and 129 key informant interviews with refugee and host populations, health workers, community and religious leaders, health workers, local authorities and humanitarian actors. Our study did not find large differences between South Sudanese refugee and host populations in regard to modern FP use, though refugees reported somewhat poorer FP knowledge, accessibility and utilisation compared to Ugandan women. Reported barriers to FP use relate to access, quality of services, health concerns and family/community opposition, all of which emphasise the importance of men's gendered roles in relationships, cultural and religious beliefs and lack of agency for most women to make their own decisions about reproductive health. Sexual and gender-based violence related to FP use was reported among both refugee and host populations. Additional barriers to FP use include lack of privacy at the public health facilities which reduces confidentiality, mistrust of health workers, and stockouts of FP commodities. Facilitating factors for FP use included: free government health services; the presence of well-trained health workers; and NGOs who give support to populations and conduct community outreaches. The findings of this study underscore the importance of developing and implementing tailored sexual and reproductive health information and services, especially for modern FP methods, in partnership with South Sudanese refugee and host populations in Northern Uganda.

摘要

全球范围内,受冲突影响人群对计划生育的未满足需求很高,这使得女孩和妇女容易意外怀孕,并面临不良的性健康和生殖健康后果。我们的研究是已知的第一项混合方法研究,旨在评估乌干达北部已婚或有伴侣的南苏丹难民及当地居民对现代计划生育(FP)方法的使用情况,并探究两者之间的差异。2019年7月,我们进行了一项横断面调查,调查对象包括来自基里安东戈和阿鲁阿的当地及南苏丹难民社区的1533名有伴侣的育龄妇女(15 - 49岁)。2019年10月至2020年1月,通过34次焦点小组讨论以及对难民和当地居民、卫生工作者、社区和宗教领袖、卫生工作者、地方当局及人道主义行动者进行129次关键信息人访谈,收集了定性数据。我们的研究发现,南苏丹难民和当地居民在现代FP使用方面没有很大差异,不过与乌干达妇女相比,难民报告的FP知识、可及性和利用率略差。报告的FP使用障碍涉及可及性、服务质量、健康担忧以及家庭/社区反对,所有这些都强调了男性在关系中的性别角色、文化和宗教信仰的重要性,以及大多数女性缺乏自主决定生殖健康的能力。难民和当地居民中都报告了与FP使用相关的性暴力和基于性别的暴力。FP使用的其他障碍包括公共卫生设施缺乏隐私,这降低了保密性、对卫生工作者的不信任以及FP商品缺货。FP使用的促进因素包括:免费的政府卫生服务;有训练有素的卫生工作者;以及为人群提供支持并开展社区外展活动的非政府组织。这项研究的结果强调了与乌干达北部的南苏丹难民和当地居民合作,制定和实施量身定制的性健康和生殖健康信息及服务的重要性,特别是针对现代FP方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b71a/10022387/f38c87e2fd7e/pgph.0000348.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验