Department of Community Health and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Jul 26;24(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03272-z.
Contraceptive use is known to have a positive impact on maternal and child health outcomes; however, its use is still low in low-income countries, especially among people in humanitarian situations. This study explored decision-making processes towards the use of contraceptives by people in humanitarian situations to inform program design and uptake.
A qualitative exploratory study was conducted among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) and men (15-60 years) living in three refugee settlements of Pagirinya, Nyumanzi, and Mirieyi and the surrounding host communities in Adjumani district, Uganda. Data were collected using 49 in-depth interviews (IDIs), 11 Key Informant Interviews (KIIs,) and 20 Focus Group Discussions (FGDs). Inductive thematic analysis was done with the aid of Atlas ti. Version 14.
We found that the decision-making processes entailed linear and nonlinear internalized cognitive and contextual processes involving four dynamic pathways. In the linear pathway, participants reported starting with 1) idea inception, 2) followed by cognitive processing, 3) consultation, and 4) decision-making for contraceptive use. The complex linear pathway happened when participants did not go through consultation but went straight to decision-making. However, participants who followed the non-linear pathway repeatedly went back to cognitive processing. Some women after consultation, or those already using and those not using contraceptives, decided to go back to cognitive processing to reconsider their current positions. This study found that some women who were not using contraceptives ended up using, while some who were using contraception ended up dropping out.
This study showed dynamic decision-making processes involving both internal and external environments as triggers to decision-making for contraceptive use. Interventions to increase contraceptive use should target both users and significant others who influence the decision to use particularly among refugees.
This study was registered by Makerere University School of Public Health Higher Degrees Research and Ethic Committee (HDREC) #188 and approved by Uganda National Council of Science and Technology on 15th/7/2021, Registration number-SS809ES.
避孕措施对母婴健康结果有积极影响,然而在低收入国家,尤其是在人道主义环境中的人群中,其使用仍然较低。本研究旨在探索人道主义环境中的人们在决定使用避孕药具方面的决策过程,以为项目设计和采用提供信息。
在乌干达阿朱马尼区 Pagirinya、Nyumanzi 和 Mirieyi 三个难民营及其周围的收容社区中,对 15-49 岁的育龄妇女和 15-60 岁的男性进行了一项定性探索性研究。使用 49 次深入访谈(IDI)、11 次关键知情人访谈(KII)和 20 次焦点小组讨论(FGD)收集数据。借助 Atlas ti 版本 14 进行归纳主题分析。
我们发现,决策过程涉及线性和非线性内在认知和情境过程,涉及四个动态途径。在线性途径中,参与者报告说首先是 1)想法的产生,2)接着是认知处理,3)咨询,4)决定使用避孕药具。当参与者没有咨询但直接做出决定时,就会出现复杂的线性途径。然而,遵循非线性途径的参与者反复回到认知处理阶段。一些在咨询后、或那些已经使用或不使用避孕药具的参与者决定重新考虑自己的立场,回到认知处理阶段。本研究发现,一些不使用避孕药具的妇女最终开始使用,而一些已经使用避孕药具的妇女最终停止使用。
本研究表明,决策使用避孕药具涉及内部和外部环境的动态决策过程,是决策的触发因素。为了增加避孕药具的使用,干预措施应该针对使用者和影响使用者决定的重要他人,特别是在难民中。
本研究由马凯雷雷大学公共卫生学院高等学位研究和伦理委员会(HDREC)#188 注册,并于 2021 年 7 月 15 日获得乌干达科学技术委员会批准,注册号为 SS809ES。