Suppr超能文献

助产护理的连续性:关于地点、方式、实施者及受益对象的范围综述

Midwifery continuity of care: A scoping review of where, how, by whom and for whom?

作者信息

Bradford Billie F, Wilson Alyce N, Portela Anayda, McConville Fran, Fernandez Turienzo Cristina, Homer Caroline S E

机构信息

Maternal, Child, and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Mater Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Oct 5;2(10):e0000935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000935. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Systems of care that provide midwifery care and services through a continuity of care model have positive health outcomes for women and newborns. We conducted a scoping review to understand the global implementation of these models, asking the questions: where, how, by whom and for whom are midwifery continuity of care models implemented? Using a scoping review framework, we searched electronic and grey literature databases for reports in any language between January 2012 and January 2022, which described current and recent trials, implementation or scaling-up of midwifery continuity of care studies or initiatives in high-, middle- and low-income countries. After screening, 175 reports were included, the majority (157, 90%) from high-income countries (HICs) and fewer (18, 10%) from low- to middle-income countries (LMICs). There were 163 unique studies including eight (4.9%) randomised or quasi-randomised trials, 58 (38.5%) qualitative, 53 (32.7%) quantitative (cohort, cross sectional, descriptive, observational), 31 (19.0%) survey studies, and three (1.9%) health economics analyses. There were 10 practice-based accounts that did not include research. Midwives led almost all continuity of care models. In HICs, the most dominant model was where small groups of midwives provided care for designated women, across the antenatal, childbirth and postnatal care continuum. This was mostly known as caseload midwifery or midwifery group practice. There was more diversity of models in low- to middle-income countries. Of the 175 initiatives described, 31 (18%) were implemented for women, newborns and families from priority or vulnerable communities. With the exception of New Zealand, no countries have managed to scale-up continuity of midwifery care at a national level. Further implementation studies are needed to support countries planning to transition to midwifery continuity of care models in all countries to determine optimal model types and strategies to achieve sustainable scale-up at a national level.

摘要

通过连续性照护模式提供助产护理和服务的照护体系,能为妇女和新生儿带来积极的健康结果。我们开展了一项范围综述,以了解这些模式在全球的实施情况,并提出了以下问题:助产连续性照护模式在何处实施、如何实施、由谁实施以及为谁实施?我们使用范围综述框架,在电子和灰色文献数据库中搜索了2012年1月至2022年1月期间的任何语言报告,这些报告描述了高收入、中等收入和低收入国家当前及近期的助产连续性照护研究或举措的试验、实施或扩大规模情况。筛选后,纳入了175份报告,其中大多数(157份,90%)来自高收入国家,较少(18份,10%)来自低收入和中等收入国家。共有163项独特研究,包括8项(4.9%)随机或准随机试验、58项(38.5%)定性研究、53项(32.7%)定量研究(队列研究、横断面研究、描述性研究、观察性研究)、31项(19.0%)调查研究以及3项(1.9%)卫生经济学分析。有10项基于实践的报告未包括研究内容。几乎所有连续性照护模式均由助产士主导。在高收入国家,最主要的模式是一小群助产士为指定妇女提供产前、分娩和产后连续护理。这大多被称为个案量助产或助产士团队执业。低收入和中等收入国家的模式更多样化。在描述的175项举措中,有31项(18%)是为优先或弱势社区的妇女、新生儿和家庭实施的。除新西兰外,没有国家成功在全国范围内扩大助产连续性照护。需要进一步开展实施研究,以支持计划在所有国家向助产连续性照护模式转变的国家,确定最佳模式类型和策略,以实现全国范围内的可持续扩大规模。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca86/10021789/9e5491c4e8ef/pgph.0000935.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验