• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国敌对环境政策对卡姆登地区难民、寻求庇护者及无证移民孕产妇护理的影响:审视医疗保健专业人员和社区组织的经历

Effects of UK hostile environment policies on maternity care for refugees, asylum seekers, and undocumented migrants in Camden: Examining the experiences of healthcare professionals and community organisations.

作者信息

Pierce Poppy, Adil Haleema, Kwok Tiffany, Cooke Catherine, Bazinet Deveney, Roll Kate, Hillman Sara L

机构信息

Medical School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Department of Science, Technology, Engineering and Public Policy, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Migr Health. 2024 Dec 28;11:100291. doi: 10.1016/j.jmh.2024.100291. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmh.2024.100291
PMID:39845262
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11751534/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The London borough of Camden has long been home for many refugees, asylum seekers, and undocumented migrants (RASUs). Over time, it has witnessed an increase in the population of these migrant groups, accompanied by notable changes in the obstacles they encounter when seeking health services, particularly maternity care. We explore how the 'hostile environment' policies affect access to and delivery of quality maternity services for RASUs.

METHODS

This study was conducted over eight months (November 2021-July 2022) both remotely and face-to-face, in various locations in Camden and in the Maternity Department at University College London Hospital, UK. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) and community organisations (COs) were identified as two major stakeholders involved in the care provision for RASUs. 33 semi-structured interviews were conducted (with 22 HCPs and 11 COs) to understand their experiences of delivering care to this population.

RESULTS

There was consensus among HCPs and COs that the current immigration policies undermined their duty of care, personal morals, and the principles of the NHS. These policies have created a restrictive environment, making it increasingly difficult for migrants to navigate the healthcare system and creating an atmosphere of distrust, propagating fears of being charged. This has led to HCPs and COs going beyond their remits to ensure that RASUs are accessing and engaging with maternity care, regardless of an individual's status and despite any potential repercussions for themselves.

CONCLUSION

In the face of an intensifying hostile environment under the UK government, supporting RASUs cannot be solely reliant on political measures. We need to advocate for healthcare navigator roles, health justice partnerships, specialist teams, and comprehensive training for service providers. HCPs and COs should be adequately supported in their endeavours to ensure RASUs have access to standardised, high-quality maternity care.

摘要

背景

长期以来,伦敦卡姆登区一直是许多难民、寻求庇护者和无证移民(RASUs)的家园。随着时间的推移,这些移民群体的人口有所增加,他们在寻求医疗服务,尤其是孕产妇护理时遇到的障碍也发生了显著变化。我们探讨了“敌对环境”政策如何影响RASUs获得和接受优质孕产妇服务的情况。

方法

本研究在八个月内(2021年11月至2022年7月)通过远程和面对面的方式进行,地点包括卡姆登的各个地方以及英国伦敦大学学院医院的产科。医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)和社区组织(COs)被确定为参与为RASUs提供护理的两个主要利益相关者。进行了33次半结构化访谈(与22名HCPs和11名COs),以了解他们为这一人群提供护理的经历。

结果

HCPs和COs一致认为,当前的移民政策损害了他们的护理职责、个人道德以及英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的原则。这些政策营造了一种限制性环境,使得移民越来越难以在医疗系统中顺畅就医,并营造了一种不信任的氛围,加剧了对被收费的恐惧。这导致HCPs和COs超越了他们的职责范围,以确保RASUs能够获得并参与孕产妇护理,无论个人身份如何,也不顾及自身可能面临的任何后果。

结论

面对英国政府日益强化的敌对环境,支持RASUs不能仅仅依赖政治措施。我们需要倡导设立医疗保健导航员角色、建立健康正义伙伴关系、组建专业团队,并为服务提供者提供全面培训。应充分支持HCPs和COs的努力,以确保RASUs能够获得标准化、高质量的孕产妇护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7079/11751534/978f41d8636f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7079/11751534/8f930abb51dc/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7079/11751534/978f41d8636f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7079/11751534/8f930abb51dc/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7079/11751534/978f41d8636f/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of UK hostile environment policies on maternity care for refugees, asylum seekers, and undocumented migrants in Camden: Examining the experiences of healthcare professionals and community organisations.英国敌对环境政策对卡姆登地区难民、寻求庇护者及无证移民孕产妇护理的影响:审视医疗保健专业人员和社区组织的经历
J Migr Health. 2024 Dec 28;11:100291. doi: 10.1016/j.jmh.2024.100291. eCollection 2025.
2
Health and well-being of refugees, asylum seekers, undocumented migrants, and internally displaced persons under COVID-19: a scoping review.COVID-19 下难民、寻求庇护者、无证移民和国内流离失所者的健康和福祉:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 26;11:1145002. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1145002. eCollection 2023.
3
The negative health effects of hostile environment policies on migrants: A cross-sectional service evaluation of humanitarian healthcare provision in the UK.敌对环境政策对移民的负面健康影响:英国人道主义医疗服务提供的横断面服务评估
Wellcome Open Res. 2019 Jul 22;4:109. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15358.1. eCollection 2019.
4
"We want our freedom back, that's our only need": a qualitative study of health and social needs among asylum seekers and undocumented migrants crossing the borders from Belarus to Lithuania.“我们想要回我们的自由,这是我们唯一的需求”:一项关于从白俄罗斯越境到立陶宛的寻求庇护者和无证移民的健康和社会需求的定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 2;12:1371119. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1371119. eCollection 2024.
5
Strategies and action points to ensure equitable uptake of COVID-19 vaccinations: A national qualitative interview study to explore the views of undocumented migrants, asylum seekers, and refugees.确保公平接种新冠疫苗的策略与行动要点:一项全国性定性访谈研究,以探究无证移民、寻求庇护者和难民的观点
J Migr Health. 2021;4:100050. doi: 10.1016/j.jmh.2021.100050. Epub 2021 May 27.
6
Mental healthcare for asylum-seekers and refugees residing in the United Kingdom: a scoping review of policies, barriers, and enablers.为居住在英国的寻求庇护者和难民提供的精神卫生保健:对政策、障碍和促进因素的范围界定审查。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2021 Jun 14;15(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13033-021-00473-z.
7
"It's a life you're playing with": A qualitative study on experiences of NHS maternity services among undocumented migrant women in England.“这是在拿生命冒险”:一项针对英格兰无证移民女性在国民保健制度生育服务方面经历的定性研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Feb;270:113610. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113610. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
8
Understanding the views of adult migrants around catch-up vaccination for missed routine immunisations to define strategies to improve coverage: A UK in-depth interview study.了解成年移民对补种错过的常规免疫疫苗的看法以确定提高疫苗接种覆盖率的策略:一项英国深度访谈研究
Vaccine. 2024 May 10;42(13):3206-3214. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.04.005. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
9
Discriminatory, racist and xenophobic policies and practice against child refugees, asylum seekers and undocumented migrants in European health systems.欧洲医疗系统中针对儿童难民、寻求庇护者和无证移民的歧视性、种族主义和仇外政策及做法。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 May 28;41:100834. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100834. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Opportunities and practices supporting responsive health care for forced migrants: lessons from transnational practice and a mixed-methods systematic review.支持为被迫移民提供响应式医疗服务的机遇与实践:跨国实践经验及混合方法系统评价
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May;13(13):1-182. doi: 10.3310/MRWK3419.

本文引用的文献

1
The Mediating Role of Migrant Community-Based Organizations: Challenges and Coping Strategies.基于移民社区的组织的中介作用:挑战与应对策略
Voluntas. 2023 May 4:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s11266-023-00572-0.
2
Midwifery continuity of care: A scoping review of where, how, by whom and for whom?助产护理的连续性:关于地点、方式、实施者及受益对象的范围综述
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Oct 5;2(10):e0000935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000935. eCollection 2022.
3
The impact of NHS charging regulations on healthcare access and utilisation among migrants in England: a systematic review.
NHS 收费规定对英格兰移民获得和利用医疗保健的影响:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 28;23(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15230-9.
4
The associations between women who are immigrants, refugees, or asylum seekers, access to universal healthcare, and the timely uptake of antenatal care: A systematic review.移民、难民或寻求庇护的妇女与获得全民医疗保健和及时接受产前保健之间的关联:系统评价。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023 Apr;63(2):134-145. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13632. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
5
Migrant women are charged up to £14 000 for maternity care in England, report finds.报告发现,在英格兰,移民女性接受孕产护理需支付高达14000英镑的费用。
BMJ. 2022 Jun 20;377:o1517. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o1517.
6
A decade of the hostile environment and its impact on health.十年的敌对环境及其对健康的影响。
J R Soc Med. 2022 Mar;115(3):87-90. doi: 10.1177/01410768221078327. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
7
The role of patient navigators in ambulatory care: overview of systematic reviews.患者导航员在门诊护理中的作用:系统评价概述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 28;21(1):1166. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07140-6.
8
Adopting an ethical approach to migration health policy, practice and research.采取伦理方法对待移民健康政策、实践和研究。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jul;6(7). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006425.
9
International Evidence on the Impact of Health-Justice Partnerships: A Systematic Scoping Review.健康与司法伙伴关系影响的国际证据:一项系统综述。
Public Health Rev. 2021 Apr 26;42:1603976. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2021.1603976. eCollection 2021.
10
Patients or passports? The 'hostile environment' in the NHS.患者还是护照?英国国民医疗服务体系中的“敌对环境”。
Future Healthc J. 2021 Mar;8(1):28-30. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2021-0007.