Mwashala Winfrida, Saikia Udoy, Chamberlain Diane
Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
College of Humanities, Arts, and social science, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Oct 5;2(10):e0000967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000967. eCollection 2022.
Vulnerable children exposed to Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) are lacking visibility in healthcare and social welfare support systems, particularly in countries where there are delays in integrating biopsychosocial care into traditional medical care. This review seeks to identify, evaluate, and summarise existing screening instruments used in measuring risks factors related to Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) in vulnerable children in Primary Health Care (PHC) settings in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The target population in this research is children from age (05-18 years) living in poverty and extreme social disadvantage. First, a systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach. A mixed-methods narrative synthesis analyzed the studies and instruments used to assess vulnerable children exposed to ACEs. Each instrument was scrutinized for quality, validity, and feasibility for use with vulnerable children in frontline clinical settings. There is a lack of suitable risk assessment instruments to identify biopsychosocial risk factors from exposure to ACEs in vulnerable children in LMIC primary healthcare settings. Among nine identified instruments from the reviewed studies, none were found suitable for rapidly identifying the effects of ACEs. This was due to issues on the reviewed instruments which could hinder their application in the rapid screening of ACEs in frontline clinical settings. This included the, retrospective nature of the instruments, decisional capacity of the rater, institutional capacity in implementation of the instruments and instruments capacity to assess individual risk factors in biopsychosocial dimensions. Therefore, currently, there is lack of instruments that can be used to identify biopsychosocial risk factors of ACEs in vulnerable children in primary care in limited-resource settings. Further development of an instrument for the rapid identification of ACEs in vulnerable children is required for an early recognition and referred for preventive care, treatment, and social support services.
暴露于童年不良经历(ACEs)的弱势儿童在医疗保健和社会福利支持系统中缺乏关注度,尤其是在那些将生物心理社会护理纳入传统医疗护理存在延迟的国家。本综述旨在识别、评估和总结在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的初级卫生保健(PHC)环境中,用于测量与弱势儿童童年不良经历(ACEs)相关风险因素的现有筛查工具。本研究的目标人群是年龄在5至18岁、生活在贫困和极端社会劣势中的儿童。首先,采用系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)方法进行了系统综述。一项混合方法的叙述性综合分析了用于评估暴露于ACEs的弱势儿童的研究和工具。对每个工具进行了质量、有效性和在一线临床环境中用于弱势儿童的可行性审查。在LMICs初级卫生保健环境中,缺乏合适的风险评估工具来识别弱势儿童因暴露于ACEs而产生的生物心理社会风险因素。在所审查的研究中确定的九种工具中,没有一种被发现适合快速识别ACEs的影响。这是由于所审查工具存在的问题,这些问题可能会阻碍它们在一线临床环境中快速筛查ACEs的应用。这包括工具的回顾性性质、评分者的决策能力、工具实施的机构能力以及工具评估生物心理社会层面个体风险因素 的能力。因此,目前在资源有限的环境中,缺乏可用于识别初级保健中弱势儿童ACEs生物心理社会风险因素的工具。需要进一步开发一种用于快速识别弱势儿童ACEs的工具,以便早期识别并转介接受预防性护理、治疗和社会支持服务。