Kesale Anosisye Mwandulusya, Mwkasangula Eliza, Muhanga Mikidadi, Mahonge Christopher
Department of Policy Planning and Management, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Department Public Service and Human Resource Management, School of Public Administration and management, Mzumbe University, Morogoro, Tanzania.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Nov 23;2(11):e0001222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001222. eCollection 2022.
The governance of epidemics is very critical for curbing and responding to several infectious epidemics. This study was conducted to explore the experience of the Health Facility Governing Committees (HFGCs) on the governance strategies they adopted to levarage the COVID 19 epidemic in their primary health facilities in Tanzania. An exploratory qualitative design was employed to study the governance strategies adopted by HFGCs during the COVID19. In this study, fourteen (14) HFGC chairpersons and ninety one (91) HFGC members with experience regulating primary health centers during a COVID 19 pandemic were involved. The study included four (4) governance response metrics that were discovered to be commonly used by HFGCs. These included coordinating responders, providing health information, explaining health hazards, and conducting out health interventions. Despite variations in implementation strategies, only two (2) governance response measures, coordinating responders and implementing, were found to be consistently applied by the majority of HFGCs. The nature of the governance path chosen by the Tanzanian government has been found to have influenced the slow reaction of primary health care governance actors such as HFGCs. Despite being empowered by Direct Health Facility Financing, COVID 19 presented challenges to several HFGCs. Though observed to be autonomous and expected to make judgments based on their circumstances, higher-level governance actors' opinions and actions on epidemics influenced the practices of local-level governance actors, including HFGCs. Indeed, for the HFGCs' potential to be realized, they must be empowered in ways other than fiscal and political decentralization. Other aspects of empowering governance actors, such as capacity building and education level, should be considered in order for them to completely realize their potential.
疫情治理对于遏制和应对多种传染病疫情至关重要。本研究旨在探索卫生设施管理委员会(HFGCs)在坦桑尼亚初级卫生设施中采用的应对COVID - 19疫情治理策略的经验。采用探索性定性设计来研究HFGCs在COVID - 19期间采用的治理策略。在本研究中,有十四名(14名)HFGC主席和九十一名(91名)在COVID - 19大流行期间有管理初级卫生中心经验的HFGC成员参与其中。该研究包括发现HFGCs常用的四项(4项)治理应对指标。这些指标包括协调应对者、提供健康信息、解释健康危害以及开展健康干预。尽管实施策略存在差异,但发现大多数HFGCs始终采用的治理应对措施只有两项(2项),即协调应对者和实施。已发现坦桑尼亚政府选择的治理路径性质影响了诸如HFGCs等初级卫生保健治理行为体的反应迟缓。尽管通过直接卫生设施融资获得了权力,但COVID - 19给几个HFGCs带来了挑战。尽管HFGCs被视为自主的,并期望根据自身情况做出判断,但上级治理行为体对疫情的意见和行动影响了包括HFGCs在内的地方治理行为体的做法。事实上,为了使HFGCs的潜力得以实现,必须通过财政和政治分权以外的方式赋予其权力。为了使治理行为体完全发挥其潜力,应考虑赋予其权力的其他方面,如能力建设和教育水平。