Lyles Emily, Chua Stephen, Barham Yasmeen, Jardenah Dina, Trujillo Antonio, Spiegel Paul, Burton Ann, Doocy Shannon
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Medair, Amman, Jordan.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Nov 2;2(11):e0001227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001227. eCollection 2022.
Cash assistance has rapidly expanded in the Syrian refugee response in Jordan and global humanitarian programming, yet little is known about the effect of multipurpose cash transfers (MPC) on health in humanitarian contexts. A prospective cohort study was conducted from May 2018 through July 2019 to evaluate the effectiveness of MPC in improving access to healthcare and health expenditures by Syrian refugees in Jordan. Households receiving MPCs (US$113-219 monthly) were compared to control households not receiving MPCs using difference-in-difference analyses. Overall health care-seeking was consistently high (>85%). Care-seeking for child illness improved among MPCs but declined among controls with a significant adjusted difference in change of 11.1% (P<0.05). In both groups, child outpatient visits significantly increased while emergency room visits decreased. Changes in care-seeking and medication access for adult acute illness were similar between groups; however, hospital admissions decreased among MPCs, yet increased among controls (-8.3% significant difference in change; P<0.05). There were no significant differences in change in chronic illness care utilization. Health expenditures were higher among MPCs at baseline and endline; the only significant difference in health expenditure measures' changes between groups was in borrowing money to pay for health costs, which decreased among MPCs and increased among controls with an adjusted difference in change of -10.3% (P<0.05). The impacts of MPC on health were varied and significant differences were observed for few outcomes. MPC significantly improved care-seeking for child illness, reduced hospitalizations for adult acute illness, and lowered rates of borrowing to pay for health expenditures. No significant improvements in chronic health condition indicators or shifts in sector of care-seeking were associated with MPC. While MPC should not be considered as a stand-alone health intervention, findings may be positive for humanitarian response financing given the potential for investment in MPC to translate to health sector response savings.
在约旦对叙利亚难民的应对措施以及全球人道主义项目中,现金援助迅速扩大,但对于多用途现金转移(MPC)在人道主义背景下对健康的影响却知之甚少。2018年5月至2019年7月进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,以评估MPC对约旦叙利亚难民改善医疗服务可及性和医疗支出的有效性。使用差分分析方法,将接受MPC(每月113 - 219美元)的家庭与未接受MPC的对照家庭进行比较。总体医疗服务寻求率一直很高(>85%)。接受MPC的家庭中,儿童患病时的就医情况有所改善,但对照家庭中则有所下降,调整后的变化差异显著,为11.1%(P<0.05)。两组中,儿童门诊就诊显著增加,而急诊就诊减少。两组中成人急性病的就医和药物获取变化相似;然而,接受MPC的家庭中住院人数减少,而对照家庭中增加(变化差异显著,为-8.3%;P<0.05)。慢性病护理利用的变化没有显著差异。在基线和末期,接受MPC的家庭的医疗支出更高;两组之间医疗支出指标变化的唯一显著差异在于为支付医疗费用而借款,接受MPC的家庭中这一情况减少,而对照家庭中增加,调整后的变化差异为-10.3%(P<0.05)。MPC对健康的影响各不相同,仅在少数结果上观察到显著差异。MPC显著改善了儿童患病时的就医情况,减少了成人急性病的住院人数,并降低了为支付医疗支出而借款的比例。MPC与慢性病健康状况指标无显著改善或就医部门的转变无关。虽然不应将MPC视为一项独立的健康干预措施,但鉴于投资MPC有可能转化为卫生部门应对措施的节省,这些发现对人道主义应对资金而言可能是积极的。