• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ViBone 活性骨基质在颈椎和腰椎脊柱融合手术患者中 12 个月的临床和影像学结果。

12-Month clinical and radiographic outcomes of ViBone viable bone matrix in patients undergoing cervical and lumbar spinal fusion surgery.

机构信息

Spine Institute of San Diego, 6719 Alvarado Road Suite 308, San Diego, CA, 92120, USA.

Connecticut Neck and Back Specialists, 39 Hospital Ave, Danbury, CT, 06810, USA.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Mar 25;18(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03686-9.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-023-03686-9
PMID:36964582
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10039495/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To investigate the clinical safety and efficacy of ViBone Viable Bone Matrix (VBM), a next generation cellular bone matrix allograft that comprises all three essential bone-forming components: osteogenic, osteoinductive, and osteoconductive factors, and is optimized to enhance cell viability and bone formation.

METHODS

This was a multi-center, prospective, post-market study evaluating the safety and efficacy of ViBone VBM in patients undergoing 1-3 level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion or lumbar interbody fusion surgery. Patients were evaluated at baseline, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up clinically and radiographically. Clinical assessment included Visual Analog Scale for pain (VAS-pain), the Neck Disability Index (NDI) for patients with cervical pathologies, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for patients with lumbar pathologies. Fusion success defined by an independent radiologist was determined radiographically by plain films.

RESULTS

Clinical outcomes evaluated with VAS-pain, NDI, and ODI scales were improved significantly at 6 and 12 months compared to baseline. All patients reached clinically significant improvements at 12 months. There were no adverse events or infections attributed to ViBone VBM. At 12 months, the fusion rate per patient was 88.1% in cervical and 97.6% in lumbar patients, while per-level fusion was 98.5% for cervical and 100% for lumbar segments.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing cervical and lumbar spinal fusion implanted with ViBone VBM demonstrated favorable outcomes at 6 months and 12 months as measured by subjective clinical measures and radiographic fusion rates. Trial registration This study was registered as NCT03425682 on 1/29/2018.

摘要

背景

为了研究 ViBone 活性骨基质(VBM)的临床安全性和疗效,这是一种下一代细胞骨基质同种异体移植物,包含所有三个基本的成骨成分:成骨、骨诱导和骨传导因子,并优化以提高细胞活力和骨形成。

方法

这是一项多中心、前瞻性、上市后研究,评估 ViBone VBM 在接受 1-3 级前路颈椎间盘切除术和融合或腰椎椎间融合术的患者中的安全性和疗效。患者在基线、6 个月和 12 个月时进行临床和影像学评估。临床评估包括疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS-pain)、颈椎病变患者的颈部残疾指数(NDI)和腰椎病变患者的 Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)。独立放射科医生通过 X 线片确定融合成功。

结果

与基线相比,6 个月和 12 个月时 VAS-pain、NDI 和 ODI 评分的临床结果显著改善。所有患者在 12 个月时均达到临床显著改善。没有与 ViBone VBM 相关的不良事件或感染。在 12 个月时,颈椎患者的每个患者融合率为 88.1%,腰椎患者为 97.6%,而颈椎每级融合率为 98.5%,腰椎为 100%。

结论

接受颈椎和腰椎脊柱融合术的患者在 6 个月和 12 个月时,通过主观临床测量和影像学融合率显示出良好的结果。

试验注册 本研究于 2018 年 1 月 29 日在 NCT03425682 上注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7406/10039495/eeb54e94adf9/13018_2023_3686_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7406/10039495/50f3814a2490/13018_2023_3686_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7406/10039495/b788aa80c40d/13018_2023_3686_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7406/10039495/2aed34feef7b/13018_2023_3686_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7406/10039495/eeb54e94adf9/13018_2023_3686_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7406/10039495/50f3814a2490/13018_2023_3686_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7406/10039495/b788aa80c40d/13018_2023_3686_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7406/10039495/2aed34feef7b/13018_2023_3686_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7406/10039495/eeb54e94adf9/13018_2023_3686_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
12-Month clinical and radiographic outcomes of ViBone viable bone matrix in patients undergoing cervical and lumbar spinal fusion surgery.ViBone 活性骨基质在颈椎和腰椎脊柱融合手术患者中 12 个月的临床和影像学结果。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Mar 25;18(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03686-9.
2
Prospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of an allogeneic bone matrix containing stem cells (Trinity Evolution® Viable Cellular Bone Matrix) in patients undergoing two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.对接受两级前路颈椎间盘切除融合术的患者使用含干细胞的同种异体骨基质(Trinity Evolution® 活性细胞骨基质)进行前瞻性临床和影像学评估。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Apr 26;12(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0564-5.
3
A prospective clinical and radiographic 12-month outcome study of patients undergoing single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease utilizing a novel viable allogeneic, cancellous, bone matrix (trinity evolution™) with a comparison to historical controls.一项针对有症状的颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病患者进行单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的前瞻性临床和影像学12个月结局研究,使用一种新型的活性同种异体松质骨基质(Trinity Evolution™),并与历史对照进行比较。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2233-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4414-7. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
4
Randomized clinical trial: expanded autologous bone marrow mesenchymal cells combined with allogeneic bone tissue, compared with autologous iliac crest graft in lumbar fusion surgery.随机临床试验:与自体髂嵴植骨相比,扩增自体骨髓间充质细胞联合同种异体骨组织在腰椎融合术中的应用。
Spine J. 2020 Dec;20(12):1899-1910. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.07.014. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
5
Twenty-four-month interim results from a prospective, single-arm clinical trial evaluating the performance and safety of cellular bone allograft in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion.前瞻性、单臂临床试验 24 个月中期结果,评估细胞骨移植物在接受腰椎融合术患者中的性能和安全性。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Nov 17;24(1):895. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06996-5.
6
Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.微创后路经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的长期耐久性:临床及影像学随访
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Jul;24(5):288-96. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181f9a60a.
7
Clinical evaluation of an allogeneic bone matrix containing viable osteogenic cells in patients undergoing one- and two-level posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis with decompressive laminectomy.对接受一期和二期后路腰椎椎间融合术并减压椎板切除术患者使用含活性成骨细胞的同种异体骨基质的临床评估。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 May 27;11(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13018-016-0392-z.
8
Clinical outcomes and fusion rates following anterior lumbar interbody fusion with bone graft substitute i-FACTOR, an anorganic bone matrix/P-15 composite.采用无机骨基质/P-15复合材料i-FACTOR进行前路腰椎椎间融合术后的临床疗效和融合率
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Dec;21(6):867-76. doi: 10.3171/2014.9.SPINE131151. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
9
Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?腰椎手术后1年的手术效果指标能否准确预测2年的预后?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Dec;25(6):689-696. doi: 10.3171/2015.8.SPINE15476. Epub 2016 Jan 1.
10
A comparison of radiographic and clinical outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with either a cellular bone allograft containing multipotent adult progenitor cells or recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2.使用含有多能成人祖细胞的细胞骨移植物或重组人骨形态发生蛋白-2进行腰椎前路椎间融合术的影像学和临床结果比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Aug 25;12(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0618-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of an allograft cellular bone matrix as an alternative to autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: radiological results & safety.同种异体脱细胞骨基质作为颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术中自体骨替代物的疗效:影像学结果与安全性
J Spine Surg. 2024 Sep 23;10(3):372-385. doi: 10.21037/jss-23-142. Epub 2024 Aug 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Existing clinical evidence on the use of cellular bone matrix grafts in spinal fusion: updated systematic review of the literature.细胞骨基质移植物在脊柱融合中的应用的现有临床证据:文献的更新系统评价。
Neurosurg Focus. 2021 Jun;50(6):E12. doi: 10.3171/2021.3.FOCUS2173.
2
Investigating the efficacy of allograft cellular bone matrix for spinal fusion: a systematic review of the literature.研究同种异体细胞骨基质在脊柱融合中的疗效:文献系统评价。
Neurosurg Focus. 2021 Jun;50(6):E11. doi: 10.3171/2021.3.FOCUS2179.
3
Allogenic Stem Cells in Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review.
同种异体干细胞在脊柱融合中的应用:一项系统评价。
Global Spine J. 2019 May;9(1 Suppl):22S-38S. doi: 10.1177/2192568219833336. Epub 2019 May 8.
4
Bone Graft Substitutes in Single- or Double-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review.单节段或双节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术中的骨移植替代物:一项系统评价。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 May 15;44(10):E618-E628. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002925.
5
A comparison of radiographic and clinical outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with either a cellular bone allograft containing multipotent adult progenitor cells or recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2.使用含有多能成人祖细胞的细胞骨移植物或重组人骨形态发生蛋白-2进行腰椎前路椎间融合术的影像学和临床结果比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Aug 25;12(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0618-8.
6
Use of Allogenic Mesenchymal Cellular Bone Matrix in Anterior and Posterior Cervical Spinal Fusion: A Case Series of 21 Patients.同种异体间充质细胞骨基质在前路和后路颈椎融合术中的应用:21例病例系列研究
Asian Spine J. 2017 Jun;11(3):454-462. doi: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.3.454. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
7
Prospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of an allogeneic bone matrix containing stem cells (Trinity Evolution® Viable Cellular Bone Matrix) in patients undergoing two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.对接受两级前路颈椎间盘切除融合术的患者使用含干细胞的同种异体骨基质(Trinity Evolution® 活性细胞骨基质)进行前瞻性临床和影像学评估。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Apr 26;12(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0564-5.
8
An early comparative analysis of the use of autograft versus allograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术中自体移植与异体移植应用的早期比较分析。
Korean J Spine. 2012 Sep;9(3):142-6. doi: 10.14245/kjs.2012.9.3.142. Epub 2012 Sep 30.
9
Cellular bone matrices: viable stem cell-containing bone graft substitutes.细胞性骨基质:含活干细胞的骨移植替代物。
Spine J. 2014 Nov 1;14(11):2763-72. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.05.024. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
10
Effectiveness and harms of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in spine fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.重组人骨形态发生蛋白-2 在脊柱融合中的有效性和危害:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jun 18;158(12):890-902. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-12-201306180-00006.