Divi Srikanth Naga, Mikhael Mark M
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Illinois Bone and Joint Institute, Glenview, IL, USA.
Asian Spine J. 2017 Jun;11(3):454-462. doi: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.3.454. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
Retrospective case series.
To report our early experience using allogenic mesenchymal cellular bone matrix (CBM) products in cervical spine fusion.
Multi-level cervical fusions have historically yielded lower fusion rates than single level fusions, especially in patients with high risk medical comorbidities. At this time, significant literature in cervical fusion outcomes with this cellular allograft technology is lacking.
Twenty-one patients underwent either multilevel (3 or 4 level) anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion, or posterior cervical fusion. ViviGen (DePuy Synthes Spine, Raynham, MA, USA), an allogenic bone matrix product, was used in addition to standard instrumentation. Radiographic evaluation was performed at 2 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 1 year postoperative. Visual analog scale (VAS) and neck disability index (NDI) scores along with return to work and leisure activity were recorded.
At 6 months postoperative, all patients had radiographic evidence of bone fusion regardless of age or medical comorbidities. All patients reported subjective improvement with a mean decrease in VAS from 8.3 to 1.5 and a mean decrease in NDI from 40.3% to 6.0% at 1 year. All patients also returned to work and/or regular leisure activity within 3 months.
Twenty-one patients undergoing high-risk anterior and posterior cervical spine fusion, with the use of a commercially available mesenchymal CBM product, went on to radiographic fusion and all had improvement in subjective outcomes. While further effort and research is needed to validate its widespread use, this study shows favorable use of CBM in cervical fusion for high-risk cases.
回顾性病例系列研究。
报告我们使用同种异体间充质细胞骨基质(CBM)产品进行颈椎融合的早期经验。
历史上,多节段颈椎融合的融合率低于单节段融合,尤其是在有高风险内科合并症的患者中。目前,关于这种细胞同种异体移植物技术在颈椎融合结果方面的重要文献尚缺乏。
21例患者接受了多节段(3或4节段)颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术、颈椎前路椎体次全切除融合术或颈椎后路融合术。除了标准器械外,还使用了一种同种异体骨基质产品ViviGen(美国马萨诸塞州雷纳姆市的DePuy Synthes Spine公司)。术后2周、12周、24周和1年进行影像学评估。记录视觉模拟量表(VAS)和颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)评分以及恢复工作和休闲活动的情况。
术后6个月时,所有患者无论年龄或内科合并症如何,均有骨融合的影像学证据。所有患者均报告主观症状改善,1年时VAS平均从8.3降至1.5,NDI平均从40.3%降至6.0%。所有患者也均在3个月内恢复工作和/或常规休闲活动。
21例接受高风险颈椎前路和后路融合术的患者,使用市售的间充质CBM产品后实现了影像学融合,且主观结果均有改善。虽然需要进一步努力和研究来验证其广泛应用,但本研究表明CBM在高风险病例的颈椎融合中使用效果良好。