• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于生命周期可持续性评估(LCSA)和地理信息系统(GIS)的多准则决策方法(MCDM)用于可持续垃圾填埋场选址:案例研究

Integration of LCSA and GIS-based MCDM for sustainable landfill site selection: a case study.

作者信息

Mozaffari Mehdi, Bemani Akram, Erfani Malihe, Yarami Najmeh, Siyahati Gholamreza

机构信息

Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture & Natural Resources, Ardakan University, Ardakan, Iran.

Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran.

出版信息

Environ Monit Assess. 2023 Mar 25;195(4):510. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11112-0.

DOI:10.1007/s10661-023-11112-0
PMID:36964894
Abstract

The paper aims at developing a framework for decision-support to select a sustainable landfill site in Bardaskan City (Iran) by combining life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) concepts and geographic information system (GIS)-based multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM). Overall, 13 criteria were chosen (three constraints and 10 factors) and classified into three main aspects of sustainability (i.e., environmental, social, and economic) to achieve the research goals. Boolean and fuzzy logic were employed to standardize the classified constraints and factors, respectively. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to calculate the factors' weights and then suitability maps were produced using the GIS analysis. The layers were combined using simple additive weighting (SAW). Next, the most sustainable sites were obtained. The results indicated that distance from city backline, groundwater depth, and distance from rural areas were the most significant factors with the weight of 0.338, 0.141, and 0.129, respectively. The final map of suitable sites was created by classifying the SAW layer according to 75, 80, and 85% of suitability to show the high, medium, and low priority areas for landfill site selection, respectively. Therefore, integration of LCSA and GIS-based MCDM to select the sustainable landfill site for municipal solid waste (MSW) is highly important, which can be effectively employed in regional and urban planning to select the location of appropriate and sustainable landfills.

摘要

本文旨在通过结合生命周期可持续性评估(LCSA)概念和基于地理信息系统(GIS)的多准则决策(MCDM),开发一个用于在伊朗巴尔达askan市选择可持续垃圾填埋场的决策支持框架。总体而言,选择了13个标准(3个约束条件和10个因素),并将其分为可持续性的三个主要方面(即环境、社会和经济)以实现研究目标。分别采用布尔逻辑和模糊逻辑对分类后的约束条件和因素进行标准化。使用层次分析法(AHP)计算因素权重,然后通过GIS分析生成适宜性地图。各图层使用简单加性加权法(SAW)进行合并。接下来,获得了最具可持续性的场地。结果表明,距城市边界线的距离、地下水深度和距农村地区的距离是最显著的因素,权重分别为0.338、0.141和0.129。通过根据75%、80%和85%的适宜性对SAW图层进行分类,创建了适宜场地的最终地图,分别显示了垃圾填埋场选址的高、中、低优先级区域。因此,将LCSA和基于GIS的MCDM相结合以选择城市固体废物(MSW)的可持续垃圾填埋场非常重要,可有效地用于区域和城市规划中以选择合适且可持续的垃圾填埋场位置。

相似文献

1
Integration of LCSA and GIS-based MCDM for sustainable landfill site selection: a case study.基于生命周期可持续性评估(LCSA)和地理信息系统(GIS)的多准则决策方法(MCDM)用于可持续垃圾填埋场选址:案例研究
Environ Monit Assess. 2023 Mar 25;195(4):510. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11112-0.
2
Selection of MSW landfill site by fuzzy-AHP approach combined with GIS: case study in Ahvaz, Iran.运用模糊层次分析法(AHP)结合 GIS 选择 MSW 垃圾填埋场:伊朗阿瓦士案例研究。
Environ Monit Assess. 2020 Jun 15;192(7):433. doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-08395-y.
3
Landfill siting for municipal solid waste using remote sensing and geographic information system integrated analytic hierarchy process and simple additive weighting methods from the point of view of a fast-growing metropolitan area in GAP area of Turkey.运用遥感和地理信息系统集成层次分析法和简单加和赋权法对土耳其加济安泰普快速发展大都市区的城市固体废物进行垃圾填埋场选址。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(3):4044-4061. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15951-7. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
4
Sanitary landfill site selection by integrating AHP and FTOPSIS with GIS: a case study of Memari Municipality, India.运用层次分析法和逼近理想解排序法(FTOPSIS)与地理信息系统(GIS)集成进行卫生填埋场选址:印度梅马里市的案例研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Feb;28(6):7528-7550. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11004-7. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
5
Sanitary municipal landfill site selection by integration of GIS and multi-criteria techniques for environmental sustainability in Safita area, Tartous governorate, Syria.叙利亚塔尔图斯省萨菲塔地区通过整合地理信息系统和多标准技术进行城市卫生填埋场选址以实现环境可持续性
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(11):30834-30854. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24287-9. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
6
GIS-based MCDM modeling for landfill site suitability analysis: A comprehensive review of the literature.基于 GIS 的多准则决策模型在垃圾填埋场选址适宜性分析中的应用:文献综述。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Oct;26(30):30711-30730. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06298-1. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
7
Landfill site selection by integrating fuzzy logic, AHP, and WLC method based on multi-criteria decision analysis.基于多准则决策分析的模糊逻辑、层次分析法和物元可拓法综合选址垃圾填埋场。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Apr;28(16):19726-19741. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11975-7. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
8
Landfill site selection using MCDM methods and GIS in the central part of the Nile Delta, Egypt.利用多准则决策方法和地理信息系统在埃及尼罗河三角洲中部选择垃圾填埋场。
Environ Monit Assess. 2023 Nov 2;195(12):1407. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11946-8.
9
Implementation of fuzzy, Simos and strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis for municipal solid waste landfill site selection: Adana City case study.模糊综合、Simos 与优势、劣势、机遇和威胁分析在城市固体废物填埋场选址中的应用:阿达纳市案例研究。
Waste Manag Res. 2020 May;38(1_suppl):45-64. doi: 10.1177/0734242X19893111. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
10
Geo-spatial technology based on a multi-criteria evaluation technique used to find potential landfill sites in the town of Bule Hora in southern Ethiopia.基于多标准评估技术的地理空间技术,用于在埃塞俄比亚南部布卢·赫拉镇寻找潜在的垃圾填埋场。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2024 Apr;74(4):207-239. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2024.2312889. Epub 2024 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the decision-making for sustainable demolition waste management by combining a BIM-based life cycle sustainability assessment framework and hybrid MCDA approach.通过结合基于BIM的生命周期可持续性评估框架和混合多准则决策分析方法,改善可持续拆除废物管理的决策制定。
Waste Manag Res. 2025 Jul;43(7):1086-1098. doi: 10.1177/0734242X241291941. Epub 2024 Nov 8.