Suppr超能文献

药物监测可检测接受含氟尿嘧啶化疗的患者的用药不足和用药过量情况-一项前瞻性、多中心德国观察性研究的结果。

Drug monitoring detects under- and overdosing in patients receiving 5-fluorouracil-containing chemotherapy-results of a prospective, multicenter German observational study.

机构信息

Department of Medicine II, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

Institut für Labor- und Transfusionsmedizin, Klinikum Passau, Passau, Germany.

出版信息

ESMO Open. 2023 Apr;8(2):101201. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101201. Epub 2023 Mar 23.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Body surface area (BSA)-based dosing of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) results in marked inter-individual variability in drug levels, whereas determination of plasma 5-FU concentration and area under the curve (AUC) is a more precise dosing method but has not been integrated into clinical routine. We conducted a multicenter, prospective study to study 5-FU AUC distributions and assess clinical factors predicting therapeutic dosing in patients receiving BSA-dosed 5-FU.

METHODS

Between June 2017 and January 2018, a total of 434 patients receiving continuous, infusional BSA-dosed 5-FU from 37 sites in Germany were included. Plasma 5-FU concentration and AUC were measured in venous blood samples at steady state. The primary objective was to determine 5-FU AUC distributions in relation to the target range, which is defined as 20-30 mg × h/l. The second objective was to explore clinical parameters that correlate with achievement of 5-FU AUC target range.

RESULTS

The primary tumor was mainly located in the gastrointestinal tract (96.3%), with colorectal cancer being the most common (71.2%) tumor entity. 5-FU was administered as monotherapy (8.1%) or as part of FOLFOX (33.2%), FOLFIRI (26.3%), or other regimens (12.4%). Treatment setting was adjuvant (31.3%) or metastatic (64.5%). The median AUC was 16 mg × h/l. Only 20.3% of patients received 5-FU treatment within the target range, whereas the majority of patients (60.6%) were underdosed and 19.1% of patients were overdosed. In the univariate logistic regression, treatment setting was the only clinical parameter that significantly correlated with achievement of the target range. Patients treated in the metastatic setting had a 2.1 (95% confidence interval 1.186-3.776, P = 0.011) higher odds to reach the target range compared with patients treated in the adjuvant setting.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients received suboptimal doses of 5-FU using BSA dosing. Therapeutic drug monitoring of 5-FU is an option for optimized individualized cancer therapy and should be integrated into the clinical practice.

摘要

简介

以体表面积(BSA)为基础的 5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)剂量方案会导致药物水平在个体间存在显著差异,而测定血浆 5-FU 浓度和曲线下面积(AUC)则是一种更精确的给药方法,但尚未纳入临床常规。我们进行了一项多中心前瞻性研究,旨在研究接受 BSA 剂量 5-FU 治疗的患者中 5-FU AUC 分布情况,并评估预测治疗剂量的临床因素。

方法

2017 年 6 月至 2018 年 1 月,共纳入来自德国 37 个地点的 434 例接受连续输注 BSA 剂量 5-FU 的患者。在稳态时,从静脉血样中测量血浆 5-FU 浓度和 AUC。主要目标是确定与目标范围(定义为 20-30mg·h/L)相关的 5-FU AUC 分布。次要目标是探索与实现 5-FU AUC 目标范围相关的临床参数。

结果

原发肿瘤主要位于胃肠道(96.3%),最常见的肿瘤实体为结直肠癌(71.2%)。5-FU 单独用药(8.1%)或作为 FOLFOX(33.2%)、FOLFIRI(26.3%)或其他方案(12.4%)的一部分。治疗方案为辅助(31.3%)或转移性(64.5%)。中位 AUC 为 16mg·h/L。只有 20.3%的患者接受了目标范围内的 5-FU 治疗,而大多数患者(60.6%)剂量不足,19.1%的患者剂量过高。在单变量逻辑回归中,治疗方案是与实现目标范围显著相关的唯一临床参数。与辅助治疗相比,转移性治疗患者达到目标范围的可能性高 2.1 倍(95%置信区间 1.186-3.776,P=0.011)。

结论

大多数患者接受 BSA 剂量方案时接受的 5-FU 剂量不理想。5-FU 的治疗药物监测是优化个体化癌症治疗的一种选择,应纳入临床实践。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验