IREC, Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Ronda de Toledo 12, 13071, Ciudad Real, Spain.
IPE, Pyrenean Institute of Ecology (CSIC), 22700, Avda. Nuestra Señora de la Victoria 16, Jaca, Spain.
Heredity (Edinb). 2023 Jun;130(6):381-393. doi: 10.1038/s41437-023-00613-w. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
In the Anthropocene, many species are rapidly shifting their ranges in response to human-driven habitat modifications. Studying patterns and genetic signatures of range shifts helps to understand how species cope with environmental disturbances and predict future shifts in the face of global environmental change. We investigated the genetic signature of a contemporary wide-range expansion observed in the Iberian common vole Microtus arvalis asturianus shortly after a colonization event. We used mtDNA and microsatellite data to investigate patterns of genetic diversity, structure, demography, and gene flow across 57 localities covering the historical range of the species and the newly colonized area. The results showed a genetic footprint more compatible with a true range expansion (i.e. the colonization of previously unoccupied areas), than with a model of "colonization from within" (i.e. local expansions from small, unnoticed populations). Genetic diversity measures indicated that the source population was likely located at the NE of the historical range, with a declining gradient of genetic diversity towards the more recently invaded areas. At the expansion front, we observed the greatest gene flow and smallest pairwise differences between nearby localities. Both natural landscape features (rivers) and recent anthropogenic barriers (roads, railways) explained a large proportion of genetic variance among populations and had a significant impact on the colonization pathways used by voles.
在人类世,许多物种正在迅速改变其分布范围,以应对人类驱动的生境改变。研究分布范围变化的模式和遗传特征有助于了解物种如何应对环境干扰,并预测在全球环境变化面前未来的分布范围变化。我们研究了伊比利亚常见田鼠 Microtus arvalis asturianus 在殖民事件后不久发生的当代广泛扩张的遗传特征。我们使用 mtDNA 和微卫星数据来调查跨越 57 个地点的遗传多样性、结构、人口统计学和基因流模式,这些地点涵盖了物种的历史分布范围和新殖民化的地区。结果表明,遗传足迹更符合真正的范围扩张(即对以前未占据地区的殖民),而不是“从内部殖民”的模型(即从小而未被注意到的种群中进行局部扩张)。遗传多样性测量表明,源种群可能位于历史范围的东北部,向最近入侵的地区遗传多样性逐渐减少。在扩张前沿,我们观察到最大的基因流和最近邻地点之间最小的成对差异。自然景观特征(河流)和最近的人为障碍(道路、铁路)解释了种群间遗传方差的很大一部分,并对田鼠使用的殖民途径产生了重大影响。