Division of Cardiology, MultiMedica IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Division of Pneumology, Semi-Intensive Care Unit, MultiMedica IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Apr;18(3):755-767. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03219-6. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
During the last decade, the CHADS-VASc score has been used for stratifying the mortality risk in both atrial fibrillation (AF) and non-AF patients. However, no previous study considered this score as a prognostic indicator in non-AF patients with mild-to-moderate idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). All consecutive non-AF patients with mild-to-moderate IPF, diagnosed between January 2016 and December 2018 at our Institution, entered this study. All patients underwent physical examination, blood tests, spirometry, high-resolution computed tomography and transthoracic echocardiography. CHADS-VASc score, Gender-Age-Physiology (GAP) index and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were determined in all patients. Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, while the secondary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality and rehospitalizations for all causes over mid-term follow-up. 103 consecutive IPF patients (70.7 ± 7.3 yrs, 79.6% males) were retrospectively analyzed. At the basal evaluation, CHADS-VASc score, GAP index and CCI were 3.7 ± 1.6, 3.6 ± 1.2 and 5.5 ± 2.3, respectively. Mean follow-up was 3.5 ± 1.3 yrs. During the follow-up period, 29 patients died and 43 were re-hospitalized (44.2% due to cardiopulmonary causes). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, CHADS-VASc score (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.59-2.91) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.86-0.97) were independently associated with all-cause mortality in IPF patients. CHADS-VASc score (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.39-1.99) and LVEF (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.98) also predicted the secondary endpoint in the same study group. CHADS-VASc score > 4 was the optimal cut-off for predicting both outcomes. At mid-term follow-up, a CHADS-VASc score > 4 predicts an increased risk of all-cause mortality and rehospitalizations for all causes in non-AF patients with mild-to-moderate IPF.
在过去的十年中,CHADS-VASc 评分已被用于分层房颤(AF)和非 AF 患者的死亡率风险。然而,以前没有研究将该评分作为轻度至中度特发性肺纤维化(IPF)非 AF 患者的预后指标。所有在我们机构于 2016 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月间被诊断为轻度至中度特发性肺纤维化的连续非 AF 患者都纳入本研究。所有患者都接受了体格检查、血液检查、肺量测定、高分辨率计算机断层扫描和经胸超声心动图检查。在所有患者中都确定了 CHADS-VASc 评分、性别-年龄-生理学(GAP)指数和 Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)。主要终点是全因死亡率,次要终点是中期随访期间全因死亡率和因各种原因再次住院的复合终点。回顾性分析了 103 例连续的 IPF 患者(70.7±7.3 岁,79.6%为男性)。在基线评估时,CHADS-VASc 评分、GAP 指数和 CCI 分别为 3.7±1.6、3.6±1.2 和 5.5±2.3。平均随访时间为 3.5±1.3 年。在随访期间,29 名患者死亡,43 名患者再次住院(44.2%因心肺原因)。多变量 Cox 回归分析显示,CHADS-VASc 评分(HR 2.15,95%CI 1.59-2.91)和左心室射血分数(LVEF)(HR 0.91,95%CI 0.86-0.97)与 IPF 患者的全因死亡率独立相关。CHADS-VASc 评分(HR 1.66,95%CI 1.39-1.99)和 LVEF(HR 0.94,95%CI 0.90-0.98)也预测了同一研究组的次要终点。CHADS-VASc 评分>4 是预测这两个结局的最佳截断值。在中期随访时,CHADS-VASc 评分>4 预测非 AF 患者轻度至中度特发性肺纤维化患者全因死亡率和因各种原因再次住院的风险增加。