• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贫血患者行左主干血运重建术的结果:海湾左主干注册研究。

Outcomes of Left Main Revascularization in Patients with Anemia: Gulf Left Main Registry.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Internal Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Cardiology. 2023;148(3):173-186. doi: 10.1159/000530305. Epub 2023 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1159/000530305
PMID:36966525
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of baseline anemia and anemia following revascularization on outcomes in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study conducted between January 2015 and December 2019. The data on patients with ULMCA who underwent revascularization through percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) were stratified by the hemoglobin level at baseline into anemic and non-anemic groups to compare in-hospital events. The pre-discharge hemoglobin following revascularization was categorized into very low (<80 g/L for men and women), low (≥80 and ≤119 g/L for women and ≤129 g/L for men), and normal (≥130 g/L for men and ≥120 g/L for women) to assess impact on follow-up outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 2,138 patients were included, 796 (37.2%) of whom had anemia at baseline. A total of 319 developed anemia after revascularization and moved from being non-anemic at baseline to anemic at discharge. There was no difference in hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) and mortality between CABG and PCI in anemic patients. At a median follow-up time of 20 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 27), patients with pre-discharge anemia who underwent PCI had a higher incidence of congestive heart failure (CHF) (p < 0.0001), and those who underwent CABG had significantly higher follow-up mortality (HR: 9.85 (95% CI: 2.53-38.43), p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In this Gulf LM study, baseline anemia had no impact upon in-hospital MACCE and total mortality following revascularization (PCI or CABG). However, pre-discharge anemia is associated with worse outcomes after ULMCA disease revascularization, with significantly higher all-cause mortality in patients who had CABG, and a higher incidence of CHF in PCI patients, at a median follow-up time of 20 months (IQR: 27).

摘要

简介

本研究旨在评估基线贫血和血运重建后贫血对无保护左主干冠状动脉(ULMCA)疾病患者结局的影响。

方法

这是一项回顾性、多中心、观察性研究,于 2015 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月进行。根据基线时的血红蛋白水平,将接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)或冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)血运重建的 ULMCA 患者的数据分为贫血组和非贫血组,以比较住院期间的事件。将血运重建后出院前的血红蛋白分为极低(男性 <80g/L,女性 <80g/L)、低(≥80g/L 且 ≤119g/L,女性 ≤129g/L,男性 ≤129g/L)和正常(男性≥130g/L,女性≥120g/L),以评估对随访结果的影响。

结果

共纳入 2138 例患者,其中 796 例(37.2%)基线时存在贫血。共有 319 例患者在血运重建后发生贫血,并从基线时的非贫血转为出院时的贫血。在贫血患者中,CABG 与 PCI 之间在住院期间主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)和死亡率方面无差异。在中位随访时间 20 个月(IQR:27)时,行 PCI 的出院前贫血患者充血性心力衰竭(CHF)发生率较高(p <0.0001),而行 CABG 的患者随访死亡率显著升高(HR:9.85(95%CI:2.53-38.43),p=0.001)。

结论

在这项海湾 LM 研究中,基线贫血对血运重建后的住院期间 MACCE 和总死亡率没有影响。然而,出院前贫血与 ULMCA 疾病血运重建后的结局较差相关,在接受 CABG 的患者中全因死亡率显著升高,而在接受 PCI 的患者中 CHF 发生率较高,中位随访时间为 20 个月(IQR:27)。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of Left Main Revascularization in Patients with Anemia: Gulf Left Main Registry.贫血患者行左主干血运重建术的结果:海湾左主干注册研究。
Cardiology. 2023;148(3):173-186. doi: 10.1159/000530305. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
2
Impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on outcomes after left main revascularization: g-LM Registry.左心室射血分数对左主干血运重建术后结局的影响:g-LM注册研究
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2023 Jan 1;24(1):23-35. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001383. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
3
[Comparison on the long-term outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery].[经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期预后比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):19-25. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.005.
4
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the DELTA Registry (drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease): a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗开口/中段病变与无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期临床结局:DELTA 注册研究(左主干冠状动脉疾病药物洗脱支架):一项多中心注册研究,评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干的疗效。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.005.
5
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Vs Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Disease: G-LM Registry.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干病变:G-LM 注册研究。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2022 Oct;47(10):101002. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2021.101002. Epub 2021 Sep 26.
6
Unprotected Left Main Revascularization in the Setting of Non-coronary Atherosclerosis: Gulf Left Main Registry.非冠状动脉粥样硬化性病变中行非保护左主干血运重建:海湾左主干注册研究。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023 Jan;48(1):101424. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101424. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
7
Drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease. The DELTA registry: a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.药物洗脱支架治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病。DELTA 注册研究:一项多中心注册研究,评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干病变的疗效。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Jul;5(7):718-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.03.022.
8
Percutaneous coronary intervention vs. coronary artery bypass grafting in emergency and non-emergency unprotected left-main revascularization.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术在急诊和非急诊非保护左主干血运重建中的应用比较。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Jul 1;28(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01189-1.
9
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.冠状动脉血运重建术后卒率比较:外科手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071.
10
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for ostial/midshaft lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery from the DELTA registry: a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.DELTA 注册研究:非保护左主干冠状动脉开口/中段病变行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期临床结果:多中心注册研究评估左主干病变的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Apr;7(4):354-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.11.014. Epub 2014 Mar 14.