Evaluation of an automated rapid urine culture method for urinary tract infection: Comparison with gold standard conventional culture method.

PURPOSE

Urinary tract infection is one of the most prevalent disease affecting people from all age groups. For its diagnosis, conventional culture and antibiotic susceptibility is the gold standard. However, its major limitation is that the results take minimum of 24 ​h and antibiotic susceptibility is available after 48 ​h. Automated culture methods having comparable sensitivity and specificity as compared to conventional culture should be evaluated for routine diagnostics. With this aim we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of automated urine culture method HB&L uroquattro by comparing with the gold standard conventional culture method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1220 urine samples were included in the study. Semi-quantitative urine culture was performed using standard methods on cysteine lactose electrolyte deficient medium. For the automated culture, HB&L Uroquattro (Alifax, Polverara, PD, Italy), standard guidelines given in the manual of the instrument were followed. Diagnostic performance in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, positive and negative predictive values were calculated.

RESULTS

Based on the final interpretation of conventional culture for the total 1220 samples, 26 samples (2.1%) showed major non-concordance as they were identified as sterile by HB&L but had significant growth by conventional culture and 19.9% showed minor non-concordance. At 100-999 colony forming unit/ml, HB&L has high negative predictive value i.e. 96.6% with 95% CI (95.2%-97.6%) and sensitivity i.e. 92.66% with 95% CI of (89.42%-95.15%).

CONCLUSION

The HB&L Uroquattro seems to be a reliable instrument to obtain urine microbiological results in a timely manner. This technique can give presumptive report to the clinician within 5 ​h only for initiation of empirical antibiotics in cases of positive results.