• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本围手术期过敏反应的流行病学研究,一项前瞻性全国性研究:临床体征、严重程度和治疗药物。

The Japanese Epidemiologic Study for Perioperative Anaphylaxis, a prospective nationwide study: clinical signs, severity, and therapeutic agents.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.

Intensive Care Unit, Gunma University Hospital, Maebashi, Japan.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2023 Jul;131(1):170-177. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.02.023. Epub 2023 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2023.02.023
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of perioperative anaphylaxis is difficult because of its non-specific and variable signs and symptoms. Therapeutic agents used to treat anaphylaxis and anaesthesiologist responses also vary depending on the case, which might affect outcomes; however, only a few studies have focused on these factors.

METHODS

This prospective study of perioperative anaphylaxis, a part of the Japanese Epidemiologic Study for Perioperative Anaphylaxis, investigated the clinical signs, its severity, therapeutic drugs, epinephrine administration, and anaesthesiologist responses in cases of perioperative anaphylaxis to assess trends and variability. Shock index was used to assess severity of cardiovascular collapse.

RESULTS

In 43 patients analysed in this study, cardiovascular signs (88.4%) were the most frequent, followed by skin (81.4%) and respiratory signs (60.5%). The presence of signs increased during the clinical course. The median time from the first signs to diagnosis of anaphylaxis was 10 (5.0-17.8) min. The rates of epinephrine use were 30.2% (unused), 48.8% (i.v.), and 20.9% (i.m.). The median time from diagnosis of anaphylaxis to epinephrine administration was 7 (inter-quartile range: 1.5-8.0) min. Antihistamines and corticosteroids were each used in 69.8% of cases. The worst shock index was higher in patients who received i.v. epinephrine (2.77 [0.90] mean [standard deviation]) than in both no epinephrine use cases (1.35 [0.41]) and i.m. epinephrine cases (1.89 [0.77] (P<0.001]).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical signs and treatments of perioperative anaphylaxis are variable, and the choice regarding epinephrine administration is based on symptom severity.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN000035350.

摘要

背景

由于围术期过敏反应的症状和体征非特异性且多变,因此其诊断较为困难。用于治疗过敏反应的治疗药物以及麻醉医师的反应也因病例而异,这可能会影响治疗效果;然而,仅有少数研究关注这些因素。

方法

本项前瞻性研究是日本围术期过敏反应流行病学研究的一部分,研究了围术期过敏反应病例的临床体征、严重程度、治疗药物、肾上腺素给药和麻醉医师反应,以评估趋势和变异性。休克指数用于评估心血管衰竭的严重程度。

结果

在本研究分析的 43 例患者中,心血管体征(88.4%)最为常见,其次是皮肤(81.4%)和呼吸体征(60.5%)。体征的出现随时间推移而增加。从首次出现体征到诊断过敏反应的中位时间为 10(5.0-17.8)min。肾上腺素使用率分别为 30.2%(未使用)、48.8%(静脉)和 20.9%(肌肉)。从诊断过敏反应到肾上腺素给药的中位时间为 7(四分位距:1.5-8.0)min。抗组胺药和皮质类固醇分别在 69.8%的病例中使用。接受静脉肾上腺素治疗的患者的最差休克指数(2.77 [0.90] 均数 [标准差])高于未使用肾上腺素的患者(1.35 [0.41])和肌肉注射肾上腺素的患者(1.89 [0.77])(P<0.001)。

结论

围术期过敏反应的临床体征和治疗方法存在差异,肾上腺素给药的选择取决于症状的严重程度。

临床试验注册

UMIN000035350。

相似文献

1
The Japanese Epidemiologic Study for Perioperative Anaphylaxis, a prospective nationwide study: clinical signs, severity, and therapeutic agents.日本围手术期过敏反应的流行病学研究,一项前瞻性全国性研究:临床体征、严重程度和治疗药物。
Br J Anaesth. 2023 Jul;131(1):170-177. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.02.023. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
2
The Japanese Epidemiologic Study for Perioperative Anaphylaxis, a prospective nationwide study: allergen exposure, epidemiology, and diagnosis of anaphylaxis during general anaesthesia.日本围手术期过敏症的流行病学研究,一项前瞻性全国性研究:全身麻醉期间的过敏原暴露、流行病学和过敏反应的诊断。
Br J Anaesth. 2023 Jul;131(1):159-169. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.02.018. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
3
[Causes and treatment of anaphylaxis in a Mexican third-level pediatric hospital].[墨西哥一家三级儿科医院中过敏反应的病因及治疗]
Rev Alerg Mex. 2021 Jul-Sep;68(3):160-164. doi: 10.29262/ram.v68i3.904.
4
Evaluation of Prehospital Management in a Canadian Emergency Department Anaphylaxis Cohort.评价加拿大急诊部门过敏反应队列的院前管理。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Sep-Oct;7(7):2232-2238.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.04.018. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
5
Emergency department visits for food allergy in Taiwan: a retrospective study.台湾地区因食物过敏而前往急诊科就诊的情况:一项回顾性研究。
Pediatr Neonatol. 2014 Aug;55(4):275-81. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2013.11.006. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
6
Anaphylaxis.过敏反应
J Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;47(2):182-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.04.018. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
7
[Anaphylaxis: clinical and therapeutic care for emergencies].[过敏反应:紧急情况的临床与治疗护理]
Tunis Med. 2009 Apr;87(4):246-52.
8
Pharmacotherapy in refractory anaphylaxis: when intramuscular epinephrine fails.难治性过敏反应的药物治疗:当肌肉注射肾上腺素无效时。
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Aug;14(4):371-8. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000080.
9
Idiopathic anaphylaxis yardstick: Practical recommendations for clinical practice.特发性过敏 yardstick:临床实践的实用建议。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Jan;124(1):16-27. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.08.024. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
10
[Incidence and clinical features of anaphylaxis during general anesthesia].[全身麻醉期间过敏反应的发生率及临床特征]
Masui. 2010 Feb;59(2):252-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Unraveling the Cause of Perioperative Anaphylaxis: The Role of Patent Blue Dye and Midazolam.揭示围手术期过敏反应的原因:专利蓝染料和咪达唑仑的作用
Cureus. 2025 Mar 4;17(3):e80013. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80013. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Cardiac Arrest Due to Perioperative Anaphylactic Shock Induced by Re-Exposure to Propofol: A Case Report.再次暴露于丙泊酚引起围手术期过敏性休克导致心脏骤停:一例报告
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 19;13(18):5548. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185548.
3
Perioperative Anaphylaxis in Japanese Secondary Care Institutions: Incidence, Causes, and the Imperative for Improved Diagnostic Practices.
日本二级医疗机构中的围手术期过敏反应:发病率、病因及改进诊断方法的必要性。
Cureus. 2024 Apr 3;16(4):e57555. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57555. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
Epidemiology of perioperative anaphylaxis in France in 2017-2018: the 11th GERAP survey.2017-2018 年法国围手术期过敏反应的流行病学:第 11 次 GERAP 调查。
Br J Anaesth. 2024 Jun;132(6):1230-1237. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.01.044. Epub 2024 Mar 16.