Suppr超能文献

牙龈生物型及其与错牙合的关系。

Gingival Biotype and Its Relation with Malocclusion.

作者信息

Al-Thomali Yousef, Mohamed Roshan Noor, Basha Sakeenabi, Setty Rekha, Manasali Bheema Setty

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Turk J Orthod. 2023 Mar 21;36(1):70-77. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2021.0054.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the relationship between gingival biotype (GT) and malocclusion.

METHODS

The review followed PRISMA standards of quality for systematic reviews and meta-analyses reporting with PROSPERO registration number CRD42020126543. The systematic database search included MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL, and other key journals; the article search was performed until February 2020. Cochrane's risk of bias in non-randomized studies-of interventions (ROBINS-I) was used to grade the methodological quality of the included studies.

RESULTS

The systematic search identified 105 studies, six studies satisfied the inclusion criteria for eligibility. The study participants ranged from 26 to 200 (total n=812), with a mean of 135. Study participants were aged between 14 and 32 years. Five studies were graded as the moderate risk of bias and one study as low risk of bias. Two studies showed thin GT among individuals with severe crowding compared to mild crowding. Three studies showed a thin GT with a narrow zone of the keratinized gingival width compared to a thick GT. No relationship was found between GT and Angle's classification of malocclusion.

CONCLUSION

No relationship was observed between Angle's classification of malocclusion and GT. Thin GT was prevalent among individuals with pro-inclination of incisors. Keratinized gingival width was narrow among individuals with thin GT.

摘要

目的

系统评价牙龈生物型(GT)与错牙合畸形之间的关系。

方法

本综述遵循系统评价和Meta分析的PRISMA质量标准,并在PROSPERO注册,注册号为CRD42020126543。系统数据库检索包括MEDLINE、Scopus、Embase、PsychINFO、CINAHL和其他关键期刊;检索文章截至2020年2月。采用Cochrane非随机干预研究偏倚风险评估工具(ROBINS-I)对纳入研究的方法学质量进行分级。

结果

系统检索共识别出105项研究,6项研究符合纳入标准。研究参与者人数从26至200不等(总计n = 812),平均为135人。研究参与者年龄在14至32岁之间。5项研究被评为中度偏倚风险,1项研究为低度偏倚风险。两项研究表明,与轻度拥挤个体相比,重度拥挤个体的GT较薄。三项研究表明,与厚GT相比,薄GT的角化龈宽度区域较窄。未发现GT与安氏错牙合分类之间存在关联。

结论

未观察到安氏错牙合分类与GT之间存在关联。薄GT在切牙前倾个体中较为普遍。薄GT个体的角化龈宽度较窄。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5090/10140659/dfeb90f17876/tjo-36-70-g1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验