• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对不同衰弱程度老年人的综合照护:对英国卢顿一项国家政策地方实施情况的定性研究

Integrated Care for Older People with Different Frailty Levels: A Qualitative Study of Local Implementation of a National Policy in Luton, England.

作者信息

Khan Nimra, Randhawa Gurch, Hewson David

机构信息

Institute for Health Research University of Bedfordshire Department of Psychiatry University of Oxford, UK.

Institute for Health Research University of Bedfordshire, UK.

出版信息

Int J Integr Care. 2023 Mar 23;23(1):15. doi: 10.5334/ijic.6537. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.

DOI:10.5334/ijic.6537
PMID:36967836
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10038114/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The NHS England General Medical Services 2017-18 contract made it mandatory for general practices in England to identify and manage older people proactively. In response to the national policy, the Luton Framework for Frailty (LFF) programme was developed to target older residents of Luton and offer interventions according to their frailty level. The aim of this study was to gain a deeper understanding of the LFF and the factors that affect the implementation of a proactive integrated care service for older people with different frailty levels (OPDFL).

METHODS

We undertook document analyses and conducted semi-structured interviews with stakeholders to create a 'thick description' that provides insights into the LFF.

RESULTS

Healthy ageing interventions bring beneficial outcomes but to increase the uptake they should be co-produced with older people. A common electronic system within primary care and multidisciplinary team meetings (MDT) aid implementation. However, variation in implementation across Luton, different levels of buy-in for MDT, and different data systems in primary and secondary care make implementation challenging.

CONCLUSION

The LFF is a promising initiative and lessons learned are likely to be transferable to other settings as proactive management of frailty takes on greater policy prominence in the UK and worldwide.

摘要

引言

英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)英格兰地区2017 - 18年的全科医疗服务合同规定,英格兰的全科诊所必须积极识别和管理老年人。为响应国家政策,卢顿衰弱框架(LFF)项目应运而生,旨在针对卢顿的老年居民,并根据他们的衰弱程度提供干预措施。本研究的目的是更深入地了解LFF以及影响为不同衰弱程度的老年人提供积极综合护理服务(OPDFL)实施的因素。

方法

我们进行了文献分析,并与利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈,以创建一份“详细描述”,深入了解LFF。

结果

健康老龄化干预措施能带来有益成果,但为了提高其接受度,应与老年人共同制定。初级保健中的通用电子系统和多学科团队会议(MDT)有助于实施。然而,卢顿各地实施情况的差异、对MDT不同程度的接受度以及初级和二级保健中不同的数据系统,使得实施具有挑战性。

结论

LFF是一项很有前景的举措,随着衰弱的积极管理在英国和全球范围内的政策重要性日益凸显,从中吸取的经验教训可能会适用于其他情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdad/10038114/95cf180a22a6/ijic-23-1-6537-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdad/10038114/4138b6c486ea/ijic-23-1-6537-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdad/10038114/9fa638fd84d8/ijic-23-1-6537-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdad/10038114/ef67c8ee9de1/ijic-23-1-6537-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdad/10038114/f4b0496c99ed/ijic-23-1-6537-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdad/10038114/95cf180a22a6/ijic-23-1-6537-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdad/10038114/4138b6c486ea/ijic-23-1-6537-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdad/10038114/9fa638fd84d8/ijic-23-1-6537-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdad/10038114/ef67c8ee9de1/ijic-23-1-6537-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdad/10038114/f4b0496c99ed/ijic-23-1-6537-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdad/10038114/95cf180a22a6/ijic-23-1-6537-g5.jpg

相似文献

1
Integrated Care for Older People with Different Frailty Levels: A Qualitative Study of Local Implementation of a National Policy in Luton, England.针对不同衰弱程度老年人的综合照护:对英国卢顿一项国家政策地方实施情况的定性研究
Int J Integr Care. 2023 Mar 23;23(1):15. doi: 10.5334/ijic.6537. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
2
Factors that affect the implementation of an integrated care programme for older people with different frailty levels: a qualitative study of commissioners and provider stakeholders.影响不同虚弱程度老年人综合护理计划实施的因素:对决策者和提供者利益相关者的定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):832. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05412-4.
3
The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on an Integrated Care Programme for Older People with Different Frailty Levels (OPDFL): A Qualitative Study with Service Providers in the East of England.新冠疫情对不同衰弱程度老年人综合护理计划(OPDFL)的影响:对英格兰东部服务提供者的定性研究
Int J Integr Care. 2024 Jul 1;24(3):2. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7703. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
4
Identifying models of care to improve outcomes for older people with urgent care needs: a mixed methods approach to develop a system dynamics model.确定照护模式以改善有紧急照护需求的老年人的结局:一种开发系统动力学模型的混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;11(14):1-183. doi: 10.3310/NLCT5104.
5
'Frailty as an adjective rather than a diagnosis'-identification of frailty in primary care: a qualitative interview study.'衰弱'作为形容词而不是诊断-初级保健中的衰弱识别:定性访谈研究。
Age Ageing. 2023 Jun 1;52(6). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad095.
6
Using Palliative Care Needs Rounds in the UK for care home staff and residents: an implementation science study.在英国,使用姑息治疗需求评估小组为养老院工作人员和居民提供服务:一项实施科学研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(19):1-134. doi: 10.3310/KRWQ5829.
7
Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: final qualitative results from prospective national evaluation in "early adopter" hospitals.英格兰二级保健中全国性电子健康记录的实施和采用:“早期采用者”医院前瞻性全国评估的最终定性结果。
BMJ. 2011 Oct 17;343:d6054. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6054.
8
Identification and management of frail patients in English primary care: an analysis of the General Medical Services 2018/2019 contract dataset.在英国初级保健中识别和管理虚弱患者:对 2018/2019 年国民医疗服务体系合同数据集的分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 18;11(8):e041091. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041091.
9
Identifying acceptable components for home-based health promotion services for older people with mild frailty: A qualitative study.确定轻度虚弱老年人居家健康促进服务的可接受组成部分:一项定性研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 May;26(3):393-403. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12526. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
10
What happens after an NHS Health Check? A survey and realist review.NHS 健康检查后会发生什么?一项调查和现实主义综述。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(12):1-133. doi: 10.3310/RGTH4127.

引用本文的文献

1
How can interprofessional collaboration be fostered and sustained in team-based care integration for older people in community settings? A realist evidence synthesis.在社区环境中,如何在老年人的团队式护理整合中促进和维持跨专业协作?一项实在论证据综合分析。
Syst Rev. 2025 May 27;14(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02862-8.
2
Factors that affect the implementation of an integrated care programme for older people with different frailty levels: a qualitative study of commissioners and provider stakeholders.影响不同虚弱程度老年人综合护理计划实施的因素:对决策者和提供者利益相关者的定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):832. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05412-4.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Integrated health and care systems in England: can they help prevent disease?英国的综合健康与护理体系:它们能帮助预防疾病吗?
Integr Healthc J. 2020 Feb 26;2(1):e000013. doi: 10.1136/ihj-2019-000013. eCollection 2020.
2
Barriers and Facilitators in the Uptake of Integrated Care Pathways for Older Patients by Healthcare Professionals: A Qualitative Analysis of the French National "Health Pathway of Seniors for Preserved Autonomy" Pilot Program: Barriers and Facilitators for Adhesion of Healthcare Professionals in Integrated Care for Older Patients: A Qualitative Assessment Based on the French National Experiment: 'Health Pathway of Seniors for Preserved Autonomy' (PAERPA).医疗保健专业人员采用老年患者综合护理路径的障碍与促进因素:对法国国家“老年人自主生活健康路径”试点项目的定性分析:医疗保健专业人员参与老年患者综合护理的障碍与促进因素:基于法国国家实验“老年人自主生活健康路径”(PAERPA)的定性评估
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Apr 22;21(2):7. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5483.
3
The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on an Integrated Care Programme for Older People with Different Frailty Levels (OPDFL): A Qualitative Study with Service Providers in the East of England.
新冠疫情对不同衰弱程度老年人综合护理计划(OPDFL)的影响:对英格兰东部服务提供者的定性研究
Int J Integr Care. 2024 Jul 1;24(3):2. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7703. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
4
Developing a framework of concerns from people living with frailty, for the Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing (MYCaW) person-centred outcome measure.从衰弱患者的角度出发,制定一个关注点框架,作为 Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing (MYCaW) 以患者为中心的结果衡量标准。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jan 31;13(1):e002689. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002689.
COVID-19 outbreak measures may indirectly lead to greater burden on hospitals.新冠疫情防控措施可能会间接加重医院的负担。
CMAJ. 2020 Apr 6;192(14):E384. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.75230.
4
Decision-Making in COVID-19 and Frailty.新冠疫情与虚弱状态下的决策制定
Geriatrics (Basel). 2020 May 6;5(2):30. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics5020030.
5
Frailty in the face of COVID-19.面对新冠疫情时的虚弱状态。
Age Ageing. 2020 Jul 1;49(4):499-500. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa095.
6
Age, comorbidity, frailty status: effects on disposition and resource allocation during the COVID-19 pandemic.年龄、合并症、虚弱状态:对新冠疫情期间处置方式和资源分配的影响
Swiss Med Wkly. 2020 Apr 30;150:w20269. doi: 10.4414/smw.2020.20269. eCollection 2020 Apr 20.
7
COVID-19 in Italy: Ageism and Decision Making in a Pandemic.意大利的新冠疫情:大流行中的年龄歧视与决策制定
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 May;21(5):576-577. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.03.025. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
8
Identification and management of frailty in English primary care: a qualitative study of national policy.英国初级医疗中衰弱的识别与管理:一项关于国家政策的定性研究
BJGP Open. 2020 May 1;4(1). doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101019. Print 2020.
9
Effects of a Multicomponent Frailty Prevention Program in Prefrail Community-Dwelling Older Persons: A Randomized Controlled Trial.多组分衰弱预防计划对社区居住的虚弱前期老年人的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Feb;21(2):294.e1-294.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.08.024. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
10
Management of frailty: opportunities, challenges, and future directions.虚弱管理:机遇、挑战与未来方向。
Lancet. 2019 Oct 12;394(10206):1376-1386. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31785-4.