Suppr超能文献

全国代表性性少数群体样本中的伙伴关系状况与心理健康

Partnership Status and Mental Health in a Nationally Representative Sample of Sexual Minorities.

作者信息

Wilson Bianca D M, Krueger Evan A, Pollitt Amanda M, Bostwick Wendy B

机构信息

University of California, Los Angeles, School of Law.

Tulane University, School of Social Work.

出版信息

Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2022 Jun;9(2):190-200. doi: 10.1037/sgd0000475. Epub 2021 Apr 29.

Abstract

Research has consistently shown mental health differences between sexual minority subgroups with bisexual people often reporting higher levels of psychological distress than lesbians and gay men. Relationship status has been suggested, but not well studied, as a potential factor contributing to subgroup differences in mental health. Using a national probability sample of non-transgender sexual minority adults across 3 age cohorts (18-25, 34-41, 52-59 years), we assessed group differences in psychological distress (Kessler 6) between lesbian/gay (N = 505), bisexual (N = 272), and queer/pansexual (N=75) respondents. We examined whether relationship status (single/partnered) moderated the relationship between sexual identity and psychological distress. Among those that were partnered, we tested whether key partner characteristics related to sexual identity - gender of partner (cisgender same-sex/transgender or cisgender different-sex) and partner sexual identity (same or mixed sexual orientation relationship) - were significantly associated with psychological distress. In bivariate analyses, bisexual and queer/pansexual respondents reported more psychological distress than gay/lesbian respondents, among both men and women. In multivariable analyses, there was not a significant main effect of sexual identity, but there was a significant interaction between sexual identity and partnership status on psychological distress among women. Specifically, while there were no significant differences in psychological distress between subgroups of single women, among partnered women, queer/pansexual women had more distress than lesbian/gay women. Further, partnership was associated with reduced distress among lesbian/gay women, but not among bisexual or queer/pansexual women. Among men, there were no significant interaction effects between sexual identity and partnership status on psychological distress. Being in a mixed orientation relationship, but not gender of partner, was a significant predictor of psychological distress among both women and men across sexual identities. Additional research should assess the partnership dynamics contributing to the association between partnership characteristics and mental health among sexual minority populations.

摘要

研究一直表明,性少数群体亚组之间存在心理健康差异,双性恋者报告的心理困扰水平通常高于女同性恋者和男同性恋者。恋爱状况被认为是导致心理健康亚组差异的一个潜在因素,但尚未得到充分研究。我们使用了一个全国性概率样本,涵盖3个年龄组(18 - 25岁、34 - 41岁、52 - 59岁)的非跨性别性少数成年人,评估了女同性恋/男同性恋(N = 505)、双性恋(N = 272)和酷儿/泛性恋(N = 75)受访者在心理困扰(凯斯勒6项量表)方面的组间差异。我们研究了恋爱状况(单身/有伴侣)是否调节了性身份与心理困扰之间的关系。在有伴侣的人群中,我们测试了与性身份相关的关键伴侣特征——伴侣性别(顺性别同性/跨性别或顺性别异性)和伴侣性身份(同性或混合性取向关系)——是否与心理困扰显著相关。在双变量分析中,双性恋和酷儿/泛性恋受访者报告的心理困扰比男同性恋/女同性恋受访者更多,无论男女。在多变量分析中,性身份没有显著的主效应,但在女性中,性身份与恋爱状况之间在心理困扰方面存在显著的交互作用。具体而言,虽然单身女性亚组之间在心理困扰方面没有显著差异,但在有伴侣的女性中,酷儿/泛性恋女性比女同性恋/男同性恋女性有更多困扰。此外,恋爱关系与女同性恋/男同性恋女性的困扰减少有关,但与双性恋或酷儿/泛性恋女性无关。在男性中,性身份与恋爱状况之间在心理困扰方面没有显著的交互作用。处于混合性取向关系中,而不是伴侣性别,是不同性身份的男女心理困扰的一个显著预测因素。更多研究应评估恋爱关系动态对性少数群体中恋爱特征与心理健康之间关联的影响。

相似文献

4
Who Adopts Queer and Pansexual Sexual Identities?谁会认同酷儿和泛性恋的性身份?
J Sex Res. 2017 Sep;54(7):911-922. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2016.1249332. Epub 2016 Dec 2.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Effects of romantic involvement on substance use among young sexual and gender minorities.浪漫关系对年轻性少数群体物质使用的影响。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Oct 1;191:215-222. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.06.037. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
7
Bisexual Mental Health: A Call to Action.双性恋者的心理健康:行动呼吁。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Jan;39(1):83-92. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2017.1391904. Epub 2017 Dec 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验