O'Shaughnessy Susan A, Colaizzi Paul D, Bednarz Craig W
Conservation and Production Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Bushland, TX, United States.
Semi-arid Agricultural Systems Institute and West Texas A&M University, Canyon, Amarillo, TX, United States.
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Mar 9;14:1149424. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1149424. eCollection 2023.
Precision irrigation technologies using sensor feedback can provide dynamic decision support to help farmers implement DI strategies. However, few studies have reported on the use of these systems for DI management. This two-year study was conducted in Bushland, Texas to investigate the performance of the geographic information (GIS) based irrigation scheduling supervisory control and data acquisition (ISSCADA) system as a tool to manage deficit irrigation scheduling for cotton ( L). Two different irrigation scheduling methods automated by the ISSCADA system - (1) a plant feedback (designated C) - based on integrated crop water stress index (CWSI) thresholds, and (2) a hybrid (designated H) method, created to combine soil water depletion and the CWSI thresholds, were compared with a benchmark manual irrigation scheduling (M) that used weekly neutron probe readings. Each method applied irrigation at levels designed to be equivalent to 25%, 50% and 75% replenishment of soil water depletion to near field capacity (designated I, I and I) using the pre-established thresholds stored in the ISSCADA system or the designated percent replenishment of soil water depletion to field capacity in the M method. Fully irrigated and extremely deficit irrigated plots were also established. Relative to the fully irrigated plots, deficit irrigated plots at the I level for all irrigation scheduling methods-maintained seed cotton yield, while saving water. In 2021, the irrigation savings was a minimum of 20%, while in 2022, the minimum savings was 16%. Comparing the performance of deficit irrigation scheduling between the ISSCADA system and the manual method showed that crop response for all three methods were statistically similar at each irrigation level. Because the M method requires labor intensive and expensive use of the highly regulated neutron probe, the automated decision support provided by the ISSCADA system could simplify deficit irrigation management of cotton in a semi-arid region.
利用传感器反馈的精准灌溉技术可以提供动态决策支持,帮助农民实施亏缺灌溉策略。然而,很少有研究报道这些系统用于亏缺灌溉管理的情况。这项为期两年的研究在得克萨斯州布什兰进行,旨在调查基于地理信息系统(GIS)的灌溉调度监控与数据采集(ISSCADA)系统作为管理棉花亏缺灌溉调度工具的性能。将ISSCADA系统自动执行的两种不同灌溉调度方法——(1)基于综合作物水分胁迫指数(CWSI)阈值的作物反馈法(指定为C),以及(2)为结合土壤水分消耗和CWSI阈值而创建的混合法(指定为H),与使用每周中子探测读数的基准人工灌溉调度法(M)进行比较。每种方法都使用ISSCADA系统中存储的预先设定阈值或M方法中指定的土壤水分消耗至田间持水量的补充百分比,按照相当于土壤水分消耗补充至近田间持水量的25%、50%和75%的水平进行灌溉(分别指定为I、I和I)。还设立了充分灌溉和极度亏缺灌溉的试验区。相对于充分灌溉的试验区,所有灌溉调度方法在I水平的亏缺灌溉试验区在节水的同时保持了籽棉产量。2021年,节水至少20%,而在2022年,最低节水量为16%。比较ISSCADA系统和人工方法之间亏缺灌溉调度的性能表明,在每个灌溉水平下,所有三种方法的作物响应在统计上相似。由于M方法需要大量人力且使用受严格监管的中子探测仪成本高昂,ISSCADA系统提供的自动化决策支持可以简化半干旱地区棉花的亏缺灌溉管理。