• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

黑暗三性格特质总是对企业绩效有害吗?检验不同的绩效结果以及竞争对抗的调节作用。

Is the dark triad always detrimental to firm performance? Testing different performance outcomes and the moderating effects of competitive rivalry.

作者信息

Haar Jarrod, de Jong Kirsty

机构信息

School of Management, Massey University (Albany), Auckland, New Zealand.

School of Management, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 10;14:1061698. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1061698. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1061698
PMID:36968690
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10038199/
Abstract

There is growing evidence that CEOs who have the 'dark triad' of personality traits (Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy) detrimentally influence firm performance. However, there is still much we do not know. The present study suggests that the CEO dark triad might directly influence typical performance indicators in different ways: positively affecting external performance indicators (breakthrough sales), but negatively affecting internal performance indicators (organizational performance). We argue that the CEO dark triad can be interpreted differently by those external to the firm versus internally, where managers are much closer to the CEO's dark personality. Our model includes managerial capital as a mediator and competitive rivalry as a moderator, and ultimately tests a moderated mediation model. Using data from 840 New Zealand firms, we find that the dark triad links to outcomes, as expected. While the CEO dark triad is negatively related to managerial capital, managerial capital does positively predict both performance indicators, and partially mediates the CEO dark triad effect. Overall, moderating effects highlight that the CEO dark triad is less detrimental in fiercely competitive business environments, acting as a consistent boundary condition across models. As competitive rivalry increases, the indirect effect of the CEO dark triad on performance decreases. We discuss the implications for understanding the role that the CEO dark triad can play in firms.

摘要

越来越多的证据表明,具有“黑暗三联征”人格特质(马基雅维利主义、自恋和精神病态)的首席执行官会对公司绩效产生不利影响。然而,我们仍有很多未知之处。本研究表明,首席执行官的黑暗三联征可能会以不同方式直接影响典型的绩效指标:对外部绩效指标(突破性销售)产生积极影响,但对内部绩效指标(组织绩效)产生负面影响。我们认为,公司外部人员与内部人员对首席执行官黑暗三联征的解读可能不同,因为经理们与首席执行官的黑暗人格更为接近。我们的模型将管理资本作为中介变量,将竞争对抗作为调节变量,并最终测试了一个有调节的中介模型。利用来自840家新西兰公司的数据,我们发现黑暗三联征与预期结果相关。虽然首席执行官的黑暗三联征与管理资本呈负相关,但管理资本确实能正向预测这两个绩效指标,并部分中介了首席执行官黑暗三联征的效应。总体而言,调节效应表明,在竞争激烈的商业环境中,首席执行官的黑暗三联征的不利影响较小,这在各个模型中都是一个一致的边界条件。随着竞争对抗的加剧,首席执行官黑暗三联征对绩效的间接效应会降低。我们讨论了这对于理解首席执行官黑暗三联征在公司中可能发挥的作用的启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de9d/10038199/0d1c32f6e8e9/fpsyg-14-1061698-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de9d/10038199/9db34fe058bf/fpsyg-14-1061698-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de9d/10038199/693cc0582408/fpsyg-14-1061698-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de9d/10038199/f77180cd89b4/fpsyg-14-1061698-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de9d/10038199/30917d374c9c/fpsyg-14-1061698-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de9d/10038199/a30573829cb7/fpsyg-14-1061698-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de9d/10038199/0d1c32f6e8e9/fpsyg-14-1061698-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de9d/10038199/9db34fe058bf/fpsyg-14-1061698-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de9d/10038199/693cc0582408/fpsyg-14-1061698-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de9d/10038199/f77180cd89b4/fpsyg-14-1061698-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de9d/10038199/30917d374c9c/fpsyg-14-1061698-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de9d/10038199/a30573829cb7/fpsyg-14-1061698-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de9d/10038199/0d1c32f6e8e9/fpsyg-14-1061698-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Is the dark triad always detrimental to firm performance? Testing different performance outcomes and the moderating effects of competitive rivalry.黑暗三性格特质总是对企业绩效有害吗?检验不同的绩效结果以及竞争对抗的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 10;14:1061698. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1061698. eCollection 2023.
2
The winner takes it all: The mediating role of competitive orientations in the Dark Triad and sport task performance relationship.胜者通吃:竞争取向在黑暗三因素与运动任务表现关系中的中介作用。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2021 Aug;21(8):1183-1192. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2020.1825822. Epub 2020 Oct 11.
3
Associations between the dark triad of personality and unspecified/specific forms of Internet-use disorder.人格的黑暗三因素与未特定/特定形式的网络使用障碍之间的关联。
J Behav Addict. 2018 Dec 1;7(4):985-992. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.114. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
4
Insider vs. outsider CEO and firm performance: Evidence from the Covid-19 pandemic.内部人vs. 外部人首席执行官与公司绩效:来自新冠疫情的证据
Financ Res Lett. 2022 Jun;47:102609. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2021.102609. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
5
Schizotypal Traits and the Dark Triad From an Ecological Perspective: A Nonclinical Sample Study.从生态视角看分裂型特质与黑暗三性格:一项非临床样本研究
Psychol Rep. 2018 Dec;121(6):996-1012. doi: 10.1177/0033294117742655. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
6
The Dark Triad and Sexual Assertiveness Predict Sexual Coercion Differently in Men and Women.黑暗人格三联征与性自信在男性和女性中对性胁迫的预测作用不同。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Apr;37(7-8):NP4889-NP4904. doi: 10.1177/0886260520922346. Epub 2020 May 21.
7
Curiosity did not kill the cat: It made it stronger and happy, but only if the cat was not "dark".好奇心不会杀死这只猫:它会让猫变得更强壮、更快乐,但前提是这只猫不是“黑暗”的。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Nov;221:103444. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103444. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
8
Online Disinhibition and Online Trolling Among Chinese College Students: The Mediation of the Dark Triad and the Moderation of Gender.网络去抑制与网络喷子行为在我国大学生群体中的表现:黑暗人格三因素的中介作用及性别的调节作用
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2022 Nov;25(11):744-751. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2022.0046. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
9
Effect of Narcissism, Psychopathy, and Machiavellianism on Entrepreneurial Intention-The Mediating of Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy.自恋、心理变态和权谋主义对创业意向的影响——创业自我效能感的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 21;10:360. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00360. eCollection 2019.
10
The (mis)measurement of the Dark Triad Dirty Dozen: exploitation at the core of the scale.黑暗三元组“十二宗罪”的(误)测量:量表核心的剥削问题
PeerJ. 2016 Mar 1;4:e1748. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1748. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Social media skepticism and belief in conspiracy theories about COVID-19: the moderating role of the dark triad.社交媒体怀疑论与对新冠病毒阴谋论的相信:黑暗三性格的调节作用
Curr Psychol. 2023;42(11):8874-8886. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02198-1. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
2
Conceptions of Happiness Mediate the Relationship Between the Dark Triad and Well-Being.幸福观念在黑暗人格三合一与幸福感之间起中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 May 11;12:643351. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643351. eCollection 2021.
3
Turnover rates and organizational performance: a meta-analysis.
员工流动率与组织绩效:一项元分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2013 Mar;98(2):268-309. doi: 10.1037/a0030723. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
4
A meta-analysis of the Dark Triad and work behavior: a social exchange perspective.《黑暗人格三联征与工作行为的元分析:社会交换视角》
J Appl Psychol. 2012 May;97(3):557-79. doi: 10.1037/a0025679. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
5
Does human capital matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between human capital and firm performance.人力资本是否重要?人力资本与企业绩效关系的元分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 May;96(3):443-56. doi: 10.1037/a0022147.
6
The dirty dozen: a concise measure of the dark triad.肮脏的十二人:黑暗三巨头的简明衡量标准。
Psychol Assess. 2010 Jun;22(2):420-32. doi: 10.1037/a0019265.
7
Corporate psychopathy: Talking the walk.企业病态人格:空谈。
Behav Sci Law. 2010 Mar-Apr;28(2):174-93. doi: 10.1002/bsl.925.
8
Leader emergence: the case of the narcissistic leader.领导者的产生:自恋型领导者的案例。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Dec;34(12):1663-76. doi: 10.1177/0146167208324101. Epub 2008 Sep 15.
9
The five competitive forces that shape strategy.塑造战略的五种竞争力量。
Harv Bus Rev. 2008 Jan;86(1):78-93, 137.
10
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.行为研究中的共同方法偏差:文献综述与建议补救措施
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.