Wang Yu-Tong, Chu Bin, Zhou Tian-Guan, Lu Min-Qiu, Shi Lei, Gao Shan, Fang Li-Juan, Xiang Qiu-Qing, Zhao Xin-, Wang Meng-Zhen, Sun Kai, Bao Li
Department of Hematology, Beijing JiShuiTan Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Peking University, Beijing, China.
Department of Hematology, Baise people's Hospital, Baise, China.
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 10;13:1110693. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1110693. eCollection 2023.
Precise risk stratification is increasingly essential in the management of multiple myeloma (MM) as some standard-risk (SR) patients still exhibit similar poor outcomes as genetically high-risk (GHR) patients in the era of novel agents. It has recently been demonstrated that functional high-risk (FHR) patients, those with suboptimal response to first-line induction therapy or early relapse within 12 months, have identifiable molecular characteristics from the SR group in the CoMMpass dataset. However, these findings lack practical validation in the real world.
MM cells purified by CD138 microbeads from newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients received fluorescence hybridization and sequencing with a 92-gene Panel. Cytogenetic abnormalities defined GHR patients with t(4;14) or t(14;16) or complete loss of functional P53 or 1q21 gain and International Staging System (ISS) stage 3. SR group was patients who did not fulfill any criteria for GHR or FHR.
There were 145 patients with NDMM, 78 in the SR group, 56 in the GHR group, and 11 in the FHR group. In the FHR group, eight patients were suboptimal responses to induction therapy, and three relapsed within 12 months. We found that male patients, patients with extra-medullary plasmacytoma (EMD), circulating clonal plasma cells (CPC) ≥0.05%, and P53 mono-allelic inactivation were significantly higher in the FHR group compared to the SR group. After a median follow-up of 21.0 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.0 months, 19.1 months and 36.6 months in the FHR, GHR, and SR groups, respectively. Compared to the SR group, FHR patients had a higher frequency of mutations in , , and . GO analysis showed that mutations in FHR were enriched for oxidative stress, chromosomal segregation, and hypoxia tolerance.
The FHR found in the SR NDMM patient group has unique clinical features, including being male, with EMD and CPC, and genetic characteristics of mutations affecting oxidative stress, chromosome segregation, and hypoxia tolerance. In contrast to previous reports, our data suggested that patients with P53 mono-allelic inactivation should be classified in the GHR group rather than the FHR group.
在多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的管理中,精确的风险分层变得越来越重要,因为在新型药物时代,一些标准风险(SR)患者的预后仍与基因高风险(GHR)患者相似。最近有研究表明,功能高风险(FHR)患者,即一线诱导治疗反应欠佳或在12个月内早期复发的患者,在CoMMpass数据集中具有可识别的分子特征,与SR组不同。然而,这些发现在现实世界中缺乏实际验证。
通过CD138微珠从新诊断的MM(NDMM)患者中纯化的MM细胞接受了92基因面板的荧光杂交和测序。细胞遗传学异常定义为GHR患者,即存在t(4;14)或t(14;16)或功能性P53完全缺失或1q21增益且国际分期系统(ISS)为3期。SR组为不符合GHR或FHR任何标准的患者。
共有145例NDMM患者,SR组78例,GHR组56例,FHR组11例。在FHR组中,8例患者对诱导治疗反应欠佳,3例在12个月内复发。我们发现,与SR组相比,FHR组男性患者、髓外浆细胞瘤(EMD)患者、循环克隆性浆细胞(CPC)≥0.05%的患者以及P53单等位基因失活的患者明显更多。中位随访21.0个月后,FHR组、GHR组和SR组的中位无进展生存期(PFS)分别为5.0个月、19.1个月和36.6个月,总生存期(OS)分别为19.1个月、36.6个月和未达到。与SR组相比,FHR患者在 、 和 中的突变频率更高。基因本体(GO)分析表明,FHR中的突变在氧化应激、染色体分离和缺氧耐受性方面富集。
在SR NDMM患者组中发现的FHR具有独特的临床特征,包括男性、患有EMD和CPC,以及影响氧化应激、染色体分离和缺氧耐受性的突变的遗传特征。与先前的报告不同,我们的数据表明,P53单等位基因失活的患者应归类于GHR组而非FHR组。