Li He-Jun, Zheng Yi-Qing, Chen Ling, Lin Shun-Ping, Zheng Xiang-Xiong
Department of Rheumatology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou 350001, China.
Department of Rheumatology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2023 Mar 21;14:20406223231160688. doi: 10.1177/20406223231160688. eCollection 2023.
Systemic lupus erythematosus-associated immune thrombocytopenia (SLE-ITP) is characterized by relapse. The risk factors of relapse and appropriate maintenance therapy strategy deserve further exploration.
To determine the risk factors for relapse and appropriate maintenance therapy in significant SLE-ITP patients (a platelet count ⩽30 × 10/l) after the first complete response.
Retrospective cohort study using the medical records of 105 patients diagnosed as significant SLE-ITP in Fujian Medical University Union Hospital during December 2012 to March 2021. Patients were followed through a call for observations in January 2022.
Data including demographics, initial clinical feature, induction and maintenance therapy, and outcome at the end of follow-up were analyzed. Risk factors for significant relapse were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression models. The cumulative hazard of significant relapse and the duration of response were estimated, and the differences in outcome between groups were compared using the Cox regression analysis.
A total of 65 significant SLE-ITP patients were eligible for the final analysis. Median [interquartile range (IQR)] follow-up duration and median [IQR] duration of response were 62.2 [41.0-79.6] months and 43.4 [20.3-68.7] months, respectively. After the first complete response, 19/65 (29.2%) had a significant relapse. Compared with sustained clinical remission (SCR) + sustained response (SR) group, significant relapse group had a higher proportion of discontinued patients (47.4% 8.7%, = 0.001). Among the 13 discontinued patients, the duration of maintenance therapy of the patients in significant relapse group was significantly shorter than that of the patients in SCR + SR group (months, median [IQR], 43.1 [32.0-62.4] 12.0 [5.1-22.0], = 0.009). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that drug withdrawal was an independent risk factor for significant relapse [odds ratio (OR) = 10.4, confidence interval (CI) 95% 2.2-47.8, = 0.003]. There was no significant difference between glucocorticoids (GCs) + hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) group and GCs + HCQ + immunosuppressive agents (ISAs) group in significant relapse rate (26.7% 22.2%, > 0.05). The two SR curves of GCs + HCQ and GCs + HCQ+ ISA group basically coincided by the Cox regression analysis, demonstrating comparable long-term outcomes ( > 0.05).
Drug withdrawal, especially abrupt withdrawal with insufficient duration of maintenance therapy, is an independent risk factor for significant relapse of SLE-ITP. HCQ combined with GCs is expected to be the first choice of the maintenance therapy for SLE-ITP patients.
系统性红斑狼疮相关免疫性血小板减少症(SLE-ITP)的特点是易复发。复发的危险因素及合适的维持治疗策略值得进一步探索。
确定重度SLE-ITP患者(血小板计数≤30×10⁹/L)首次完全缓解后复发的危险因素及合适的维持治疗方法。
回顾性队列研究,使用2012年12月至2021年3月在福建医科大学附属协和医院诊断为重度SLE-ITP的105例患者的病历。2022年1月通过电话随访观察患者情况。
分析包括人口统计学、初始临床特征、诱导和维持治疗以及随访结束时的结局等数据。使用多因素逻辑回归模型分析重度复发的危险因素。估计重度复发的累积风险和缓解持续时间,并使用Cox回归分析比较组间结局差异。
共有65例重度SLE-ITP患者符合最终分析要求。中位随访时间[四分位间距(IQR)]和中位缓解持续时间[IQR]分别为62.2[41.0 - 79.6]个月和43.4[20.3 - 68.7]个月。首次完全缓解后,19/65(29.2%)发生重度复发。与持续临床缓解(SCR)+持续缓解(SR)组相比,重度复发组停药患者比例更高(47.4%对8.7%,P = 0.001)。在13例停药患者中,重度复发组患者的维持治疗时间明显短于SCR + SR组患者(月,中位[IQR],43.1[32.0 - 62.4]对12.0[5.1 - 22.0],P = 0.009)。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,停药是重度复发的独立危险因素[比值比(OR)= 10.4,95%置信区间(CI)2.2 - 47.8,P = 0.003]。糖皮质激素(GCs)+羟氯喹(HCQ)组与GCs + HCQ +免疫抑制剂(ISAs)组的重度复发率无显著差异(26.7%对22.2%,P>0.05)。Cox回归分析显示,GCs + HCQ组和GCs + HCQ + ISA组的两条SR曲线基本重合,表明长期结局相当(P>0.05)。
停药,尤其是维持治疗时间不足的突然停药,是SLE-ITP重度复发的独立危险因素。HCQ联合GCs有望成为SLE-ITP患者维持治疗的首选。