Technol Health Care. 2023;31(5):1619-1629. doi: 10.3233/THC-220721.
Few studies have compared the clinical efficacy of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation and fusion in treating atlantoaxial fracture-dislocation.
To compare the efficacy of unilateral and bilateral fixation and fusion for atlantoaxial fracture-dislocation and to explore the feasibility of the unilateral surgical procedure.
Twenty-eight consecutive patients with atlantoaxial fracture-dislocation were included in the study from June 2013 to May 2018. They were divided into a unilateral fixation group and a bilateral fixation group (14 patients in each group with an average age of 43.6 ± 16.3 years and 51.8 ± 15.4 years, respectively). The unilateral group had a unilateral anatomical variation of the pedicle or vertebral artery, or traumatic pedicle destruction. All patients underwent atlantoaxial unilateral or bilateral pedicle screw fixation and fusion. Intraoperative blood loss and operation time were recorded. The visual analog scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring systems were used to evaluate pre- and postoperative occipital-neck pain and neurological function. X-ray and computerized tomography (CT) were used to assess atlantoaxial stability, the implants' position, and bone graft fusion.
All patients were followed up for 39-71 months postoperatively. Intraoperatively, no spinal cord or vertebral artery injury was observed. At the last follow-up, occipital-neck pain and neurological function in the two groups were significantly improved (P< 0.05). The X-ray films and CT showed satisfactory atlantoaxial stability, implant position, and osseous fusion in all the patients at 6 months postoperatively.
Unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation and fusion can restore atlantoaxial stability and improve occipital-neck pain and neurological function in patients with atlantoaxial fracture-dislocation. The unilateral surgical procedure can be a supplementary option for patients with unilateral abnormal atlantoaxial lesions.
很少有研究比较单侧和双侧椎弓根螺钉固定融合治疗寰枢椎骨折脱位的临床疗效。
比较单侧和双侧固定融合治疗寰枢椎骨折脱位的疗效,探讨单侧手术的可行性。
2013 年 6 月至 2018 年 5 月,连续纳入 28 例寰枢椎骨折脱位患者,分为单侧固定组和双侧固定组(每组 14 例,平均年龄分别为 43.6±16.3 岁和 51.8±15.4 岁)。单侧组有单侧解剖变异的椎弓根或椎动脉,或外伤性椎弓根破坏。所有患者均行寰枢椎单侧或双侧椎弓根螺钉固定融合术。记录术中出血量和手术时间。采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)和日本骨科协会(JOA)评分系统评估术前和术后枕颈痛和神经功能。X 线和计算机断层扫描(CT)评估寰枢椎稳定性、植入物位置和植骨融合情况。
所有患者术后随访 39-71 个月。术中无脊髓或椎动脉损伤。末次随访时,两组枕颈痛和神经功能均明显改善(P<0.05)。X 线片和 CT 显示所有患者术后 6 个月寰枢椎稳定性、植入物位置和骨融合良好。
单侧和双侧椎弓根螺钉固定融合均可恢复寰枢椎稳定性,改善寰枢椎骨折脱位患者的枕颈痛和神经功能。单侧手术可作为单侧寰枢椎病变患者的补充选择。