• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

列线图预测卵巢透明细胞癌患者个体生存的建立和外部验证。

Development and external validation of nomograms for predicting individual survival in patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2023 May;12(10):11385-11395. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5853. Epub 2023 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1002/cam4.5853
PMID:36971044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10242816/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is a distinct and highly malignant subtype of ovarian cancer with high individual heterogeneity in survival that requires specific prognostic predictive tools. Thus, this study aimed to construct and validate nomograms for predicting individual survival in OCCC patients.

METHODS

In total, 91 patients with OCCC who were diagnosed and treated at Renji Hospital between 2010 and 2020 were extracted as the training cohort, then 86 patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC were used as the external validation cohort. Prognostic factors that affect survival were identified using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. Nomograms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were then established with the Cox regression model and the performance was subsequently evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), calibration plots, decision curve analysis (DCA), and risk subgroup classification.

RESULTS

Advanced tumor, ascites of >400 mL, lymph node-positive, CA199 of >142.3 IU/mL, and fibrinogen of >5.36 g/L were identified as risk factors for OS while advanced tumor, ascites of >400 mL, lymph node-positive, and fibrinogen of >5.36 g/L were risk factors for PFS. The C-indexes for the OS and PFS nomograms were 0.899 and 0.731 in the training cohort and 0.804 and 0.787 in the validation cohort, respectively. The calibration plots showed that nomograms could provide better consistency in predicting patient survival than the FIGO staging system. DCA also demonstrated that nomograms were more clinically beneficial than the FIGO staging system. Additionally, patients could be classified into two risk groups based on scores using nomograms, with significant survival differences.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed nomograms that could more objectively and reliably predict the individual survival of patients with OCCC compared with the FIGO staging system. These tools might assist in clinical decision-making and management of patients with OCCC to improve their survival outcomes.

摘要

目的

卵巢透明细胞癌(OCCC)是一种独特且高度恶性的卵巢癌亚型,其生存存在高度个体异质性,需要特定的预后预测工具。因此,本研究旨在构建和验证预测 OCCC 患者个体生存的列线图。

方法

从 2010 年至 2020 年在仁济医院诊断和治疗的 91 名 OCCC 患者中提取作为训练队列,然后从中国科学技术大学第一附属医院提取 86 名患者作为外部验证队列。使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归识别影响生存的预后因素。然后使用 Cox 回归模型建立无进展生存(PFS)和总生存(OS)的列线图,并使用一致性指数(C-index)、校准图、决策曲线分析(DCA)和风险亚组分类评估性能。

结果

晚期肿瘤、腹水>400ml、淋巴结阳性、CA199>142.3IU/ml 和纤维蛋白原>5.36g/L 被确定为 OS 的危险因素,而晚期肿瘤、腹水>400ml、淋巴结阳性和纤维蛋白原>5.36g/L 是 PFS 的危险因素。OS 和 PFS 列线图在训练队列中的 C 指数分别为 0.899 和 0.731,在验证队列中的 C 指数分别为 0.804 和 0.787。校准图表明,与 FIGO 分期系统相比,列线图可以更好地预测患者的生存一致性。DCA 还表明,列线图比 FIGO 分期系统更具临床益处。此外,还可以根据列线图的评分将患者分为两个风险组,生存差异显著。

结论

与 FIGO 分期系统相比,我们开发的列线图可以更客观、更可靠地预测 OCCC 患者的个体生存。这些工具可能有助于临床决策和 OCCC 患者的管理,以提高他们的生存结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941f/10242816/b3d3839407be/CAM4-12-11385-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941f/10242816/87a8a055679e/CAM4-12-11385-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941f/10242816/0c3f0b85a00f/CAM4-12-11385-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941f/10242816/30c704a3ee1b/CAM4-12-11385-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941f/10242816/4e23242a0b40/CAM4-12-11385-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941f/10242816/b3d3839407be/CAM4-12-11385-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941f/10242816/87a8a055679e/CAM4-12-11385-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941f/10242816/0c3f0b85a00f/CAM4-12-11385-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941f/10242816/30c704a3ee1b/CAM4-12-11385-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941f/10242816/4e23242a0b40/CAM4-12-11385-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941f/10242816/b3d3839407be/CAM4-12-11385-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and external validation of nomograms for predicting individual survival in patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma.列线图预测卵巢透明细胞癌患者个体生存的建立和外部验证。
Cancer Med. 2023 May;12(10):11385-11395. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5853. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
2
Development and validation of Nomograms for predicting overall survival and Cancer-specific survival in patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma.卵巢透明细胞癌患者总生存和癌症特异性生存的列线图的建立与验证。
J Ovarian Res. 2020 Oct 17;13(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13048-020-00727-3.
3
Prognostic nomogram that predicts progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma.预测卵巢透明细胞癌患者无进展生存期和总生存期的预后列线图。
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 31;12:956380. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.956380. eCollection 2022.
4
Construction and validation of log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS)-based nomograms for predicting overall survival and cancer-specific survival in ovarian clear cell carcinoma patients.基于阳性淋巴结对数比值(LODDS)的列线图在预测卵巢透明细胞癌患者总生存期和癌症特异性生存期方面的构建与验证
Front Oncol. 2024 Mar 21;14:1370272. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1370272. eCollection 2024.
5
Exploration and prognostic analysis of two types of high-risk ovarian cancers: clear cell vs. serous carcinoma: a population-based study.两种高危型卵巢癌(透明细胞癌与浆液性癌)的探索性预后分析:一项基于人群的研究。
J Ovarian Res. 2024 Jun 1;17(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s13048-024-01435-y.
6
Developing and validating a prognostic nomogram for ovarian clear cell carcinoma patients: A retrospective comparison of lymph node staging schemes with competing risk analysis.开发并验证卵巢透明细胞癌患者的预后列线图:基于竞争风险分析的淋巴结分期方案回顾性比较
Front Oncol. 2022 Nov 9;12:940601. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.940601. eCollection 2022.
7
Nomograms for Predicting Overall Survival and Cancer-Specific Survival of Young Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Analysis Based on SEER Program.基于 SEER 计划的上皮性卵巢癌年轻患者总生存和癌症特异性生存的预测列线图分析。
Adv Ther. 2022 Jan;39(1):257-285. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01955-9. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
8
Prognostic nomograms based on log odds of positive lymph nodes for patients with renal cell carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study.基于淋巴结阳性对数优势比的肾细胞癌患者预后列线图:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2018 Dec;60:28-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.10.038. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
9
Nomogram Based on microRNA Signature Contributes to Improve Survival Prediction of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.基于微小RNA特征的列线图有助于改善透明细胞肾细胞癌的生存预测。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Mar 24;2020:7434737. doi: 10.1155/2020/7434737. eCollection 2020.
10
Development and Validation of a Nomogram-Based Prognostic Evaluation Model for Sarcomatoid Hepatocellular Carcinoma.肉瘤样肝细胞癌列线图预后评估模型的建立与验证。
Adv Ther. 2020 Jul;37(7):3185-3205. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01357-3. Epub 2020 May 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Therapeutic Strategies Focused on Cancer-Associated Hypercoagulation for Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma.聚焦于卵巢透明细胞癌相关高凝状态的治疗策略
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Apr 24;14(9):2125. doi: 10.3390/cancers14092125.
2
Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: Epidemiology, pathological and biological features, treatment options and clinical outcomes.卵巢透明细胞癌:流行病学、病理和生物学特征、治疗选择和临床结局。
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Sep;162(3):741-750. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.06.033. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
3
Clinical characteristics and prognosis of ovarian clear cell carcinoma: a 10-year retrospective study.
卵巢透明细胞癌的临床特征和预后:一项 10 年回顾性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Mar 25;21(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08061-7.
4
Cancer Statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality, Survival, and Prevalence in 2018.《韩国癌症统计数据:2018 年发病率、死亡率、生存率和流行率》
Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Apr;53(2):301-315. doi: 10.4143/crt.2021.291. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
5
Early-stage clear cell ovarian cancer compared to high-grade histological subtypes: An outcome exploratory analysis in two oncology centers.早期低级别卵巢透明细胞癌与高级别组织学亚型相比:两个肿瘤中心的结局探索性分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jan;160(1):64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.10.014. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
6
Development and validation of Nomograms for predicting overall survival and Cancer-specific survival in patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma.卵巢透明细胞癌患者总生存和癌症特异性生存的列线图的建立与验证。
J Ovarian Res. 2020 Oct 17;13(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13048-020-00727-3.
7
The untapped potential of ascites in ovarian cancer research and treatment.腹水在卵巢癌研究和治疗中的未开发潜力。
Br J Cancer. 2020 Jul;123(1):9-16. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0875-x. Epub 2020 May 8.
8
A retrospective study for investigating the relationship between old and new staging systems with prognosis in ovarian cancer using gynecologic cancer registry of Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG): disparity between serous carcinoma and clear cell carcinoma.一项使用日本妇产科协会妇科癌症登记处(JSOG)调查卵巢癌新旧分期系统与预后关系的回顾性研究:浆液性癌与透明细胞癌之间的差异。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Jul;31(4):e45. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e45. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
9
Adjuvant chemotherapy vs. observation in stage I clear cell ovarian carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Ⅰ期透明细胞卵巢癌辅助化疗与观察比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Apr;157(1):293-298. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.12.045. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
10
Comparison of diagnostic values between CA125 combined with CA199 and ultrasound combined with CT in ovarian cancer.CA125联合CA199与超声联合CT在卵巢癌诊断价值上的比较。
Oncol Lett. 2019 Jun;17(6):5523-5528. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10264. Epub 2019 Apr 18.