Comparison of temporal-to-frontal horn shunt and ventriculo-peritoneal shunt for treatment of trapped temporal horn: a retrospective cohort study.

As a localized hydrocephalus, trapped temporal horn (TTH) can be effectively resolved via cerebrospinal fluid shunting. In addition to conventional ventriculo-peritoneal shunt (VPS), temporal-to-frontal horn shunt (TFHS) has been described as a less complex and invasive procedure with promising results; however, there is limited data comparing VPS to TFHS regarding patient outcomes. This study aims to compare TFHS versus VPS for treatment of TTH. We conducted a comparative cohort study with patients undergoing TFHS or VPS for TTH after surgery of trigonal or peritrigonal tumors between 2012 and 2021. The primary outcome was revision rates at 30-day, 6-month, and 1-year. Secondary outcomes included operative duration, postoperative pain, hospital stay, overdrainage, and cost for shunt placement and revision. A total of 24 patients included, with 13 (54.2%) patients receiving TFHS and 11 (45.8%) receiving VPS. Both cohorts shared similar baseline characteristics. There were no significant differences between TFHS and VPS in 30-day (7.7% vs 9.1%, p > 0.99), 6-month (7.7% vs 18.2%, p = 0.576), or 1-year (8.3% vs 18.2%, p = 0.590) revision rates. There were no significant differences in terms of operative duration (93.5 ± 24.1 vs 90.5 ± 29.6 min, p = 0.744), surgical site pain (0 vs 18.2%, p = 0.199), or postoperative length of stay (4.8 ± 2.6 vs 6.9 ± 4.0 days, p = 0.157) between the two groups. For the TFHS cohort, no patient experienced shunt related overdrainage, and there was a trend towards fewer overdrainage (0% vs 27.3%, p = 0.082) compared with VPS. TFHS offered significant reduction in cost for initial shunt (¥20,417 vs ¥33,314, p = 0.030) and total costs for shunt and revision (¥21,602 vs ¥43,196, p = 0.006) compared to VPS. As a technique of valveless shunt and without abdominal incision, TFHS is cosmetic, cost-effective, and completely free of overdrainage with similar revision rates as compared with VPS.