Pulmonary Division, Heart Institute, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Physiotherapy Service, Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2023 Mar 9;78:100180. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2023.100180. eCollection 2023.
Elderly patients are more susceptible to Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) and are more likely to develop it in severe forms, (e.g., Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome [ARDS]). Prone positioning is a treatment strategy for severe ARDS; however, its response in the elderly population remains poorly understood. The main objective was to evaluate the predictive response and mortality of elderly patients exposed to prone positioning due to ARDS-COVID-19.
This retrospective multicenter cohort study involved 223 patients aged ≥ 65 years, who received prone position sessions for severe ARDS due to COVID-19, using invasive mechanical ventilation. The PaO/FiO ratio was used to assess the oxygenation response. The 20-point improvement in PaO/FiO after the first prone session was considered for good response. Data were collected from electronic medical records, including demographic data, laboratory/image exams, complications, comorbidities, SAPS III and SOFA scores, use of anticoagulants and vasopressors, ventilator settings, and respiratory system mechanics. Mortality was defined as deaths that occurred until hospital discharge.
Most patients were male, with arterial hypertension and diabetes mellitus as the most prevalent comorbidities. The non-responders group had higher SAPS III and SOFA scores, and a higher incidence of complications. There was no difference in mortality rate. A lower SAPS III score was a predictor of oxygenation response, and the male sex was a risk predictor of mortality.
The present study suggests the oxygenation response to prone positioning in elderly patients with severe COVID-19-ARDS correlates with the SAPS III score. Furthermore, the male sex is a risk predictor of mortality.
老年患者更容易感染 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19),并且更容易出现严重的 COVID-19 感染,例如急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)。俯卧位通气是治疗严重 ARDS 的一种策略,但是其在老年人群中的反应尚不清楚。主要目的是评估因 ARDS-COVID-19 而接受俯卧位通气的老年患者的预测反应和死亡率。
本回顾性多中心队列研究纳入了 223 名年龄≥65 岁的患者,这些患者因 COVID-19 导致严重 ARDS 而接受了俯卧位通气。使用 PaO/FiO 比值评估氧合反应。第一次俯卧位通气后 PaO/FiO 提高 20 分被认为是良好反应。数据来自电子病历,包括人口统计学数据、实验室/影像检查、并发症、合并症、SAPS III 和 SOFA 评分、抗凝剂和血管加压素的使用、呼吸机设置和呼吸系统力学。死亡率定义为住院期间死亡。
大多数患者为男性,最常见的合并症为动脉高血压和糖尿病。无反应组的 SAPS III 和 SOFA 评分更高,并发症发生率更高。死亡率无差异。SAPS III 评分较低是氧合反应的预测因素,男性是死亡率的风险预测因素。
本研究表明,俯卧位通气对严重 COVID-19-ARDS 老年患者的氧合反应与 SAPS III 评分相关。此外,男性是死亡率的风险预测因素。