Suppr超能文献

在一项关于死亡率的流行病学研究中,为了调整饮食数据中的偏度和相关性,同时处理随机测量误差,提出了一种多变量联合模型。

A multivariate joint model to adjust for random measurement error while handling skewness and correlation in dietary data in an epidemiologic study of mortality.

机构信息

StatsDecide Analytics and Consulting Ltd, Nakuru, Kenya.

StatsDecide Analytics and Consulting Ltd, Nakuru, Kenya.

出版信息

Ann Epidemiol. 2023 Jun;82:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2023.03.007. Epub 2023 Mar 25.

Abstract

PURPOSE

A substantial proportion of global deaths is attributed to unhealthy diets, which can be assessed at baseline or longitudinally. We demonstrated how to simultaneously correct for random measurement error, correlations, and skewness in the estimation of associations between dietary intake and all-cause mortality.

METHODS

We applied a multivariate joint model (MJM) that simultaneously corrected for random measurement error, skewness, and correlation among longitudinally measured intake levels of cholesterol, total fat, dietary fiber, and energy with all-cause mortality using US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey linked to the National Death Index mortality data. We compared MJM with the mean method that assessed intake levels as the mean of a person's intake.

RESULTS

The estimates from MJM were larger than those from the mean method. For instance, the logarithm of hazard ratio for dietary fiber intake increased by 14 times (from -0.04 to -0.60) with the MJM method. This translated into a relative hazard of death of 0.55 (95% credible interval: 0.45, 0.65) with the MJM and 0.96 (95% credible interval: 0.95, 0.97) with the mean method.

CONCLUSIONS

MJM adjusts for random measurement error and flexibly addresses correlations and skewness among longitudinal measures of dietary intake when estimating their associations with death.

摘要

目的

不健康的饮食是导致全球死亡的主要原因之一,可以在基线或纵向进行评估。我们展示了如何同时纠正随机测量误差、相关性和饮食摄入与全因死亡率之间关联估计中的偏度。

方法

我们应用了一种多变量联合模型 (MJM),该模型同时纠正了随机测量误差、偏度和胆固醇、总脂肪、膳食纤维和能量的纵向测量摄入量之间的相关性,使用美国国家健康和营养检查调查与国家死亡指数死亡率数据相关联。我们将 MJM 与平均法进行了比较,平均法将摄入量评估为一个人的摄入量的平均值。

结果

MJM 的估计值大于平均法的估计值。例如,膳食纤维摄入量的对数危险比通过 MJM 方法增加了 14 倍(从-0.04 到-0.60)。这转化为死亡率的相对风险为 0.55(95%可信区间:0.45,0.65),MJM 和 0.96(95%可信区间:0.95,0.97)与平均方法。

结论

MJM 可调整随机测量误差,并在估计饮食摄入的纵向测量与其与死亡的关联时灵活处理相关性和偏度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f49/10239394/9d4e1a21cff8/nihms-1886860-f0001.jpg

相似文献

5
Measurement error and dietary intake.测量误差与饮食摄入量。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 1998;445:139-45. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-1959-5_9.
9

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验