ARQ Centrum'45, Nienoord 13, 1112 XE, Diemen, The Netherlands.
ARQ National Psychotrauma Centre, 1112 XE, Diemen, The Netherlands.
Fam Process. 2023 Jun;62(2):499-514. doi: 10.1111/famp.12876. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to provide an overview of existing controlled trials focusing on the impact of multiple family therapy (MFT) on mental health problems and family functioning, and to examine the efficacy of MFT. Relevant studies were selected following a screening of 3376 studies identified by a systematic search of seven databases. The following data were extracted: participant characteristics, program characteristics, study characteristics, and information of mental health problems and/or family functioning. A total of 31 peer-reviewed, English, controlled studies evaluating the effect of MFT were included in the systematic review. Sixteen studies presenting 16 trials were included in the meta-analysis. All but one of the studies was at risk of bias, with problems concerning confounding, selection of participants and missing data. The findings confirm that MFT is offered in diverse settings, with studies presenting a variety of therapeutic modalities, focal problems, and populations. Individual studies reported some positive findings, including improvements in mental health, vocational outcomes, and social functioning. The findings of the meta-analysis suggest that MFT is associated with improvements in symptoms of schizophrenia. However, this effect was found not to be significant due to the large amount of heterogeneity. In addition, MFT was associated with small improvements in family functioning. We found little evidence to suggest that MFT successfully alleviates mood and conduct problems. To conclude, more methodologically rigorous research is needed to further examine the potential benefits of MFT, as well as the working mechanisms and core components of MFT.
本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是提供一个现有对照试验的概述,重点关注多种家庭治疗(MFT)对心理健康问题和家庭功能的影响,并检查 MFT 的疗效。通过对七个数据库进行系统搜索,筛选出 3376 项研究,确定了相关研究。提取的数据包括:参与者特征、方案特征、研究特征,以及心理健康问题和/或家庭功能的信息。共有 31 项同行评审的英文对照研究评估了 MFT 的效果,包括在系统评价中。荟萃分析中纳入了 16 项研究的 16 项试验。除一项研究外,所有研究都存在偏倚风险,存在混杂、参与者选择和数据缺失等问题。研究结果证实,MFT 在不同环境中提供,研究采用了各种治疗模式、焦点问题和人群。个别研究报告了一些积极的发现,包括心理健康、职业结果和社会功能的改善。荟萃分析的结果表明,MFT 与精神分裂症症状的改善有关。然而,由于异质性很大,这种效果并不显著。此外,MFT 与家庭功能的小改善有关。我们几乎没有证据表明 MFT 能成功缓解情绪和行为问题。总之,需要更严格的方法学研究来进一步检查 MFT 的潜在益处,以及 MFT 的工作机制和核心组成部分。