• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[铒激光与涡轮机手机拔除下颌阻生智齿的对比研究]

[Comparative study on extraction of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth by Er:YAG laser and turbine handpiece].

作者信息

Zhang Ying-Hao, Zhao Ning, Zhao Ai-Jie, Zhu Chao

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,Weifang Medical University. Weifang 261000, China. E-mail:

出版信息

Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2023 Feb;32(1):75-79.

PMID:36973848
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical effect of Er:YAG laser and turbine handpiece in the removal of lower horizontally impacted wisdom teeth, and to evaluate the operation time, postoperative pain, facial swelling, degree of mouth opening limitation and complications.

METHODS

From March 2020 to May 2022, forty patients with bilateral lower mandibular horizontally impacted wisdom teeth in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of Linyi People's Hospital were selected,and all bilateral wisdom teeth were partially bone buried. The bilateral wisdom teeth of each patient were removed by Er:YAG laser on one side and turbine handpiece on the other side, respectively. The patients were divided into experimental(laser) group and control(turbine handpiece) group according to the ways of bone removal on each side. The clinical effect of the two groups was compared after a week of follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 19.0 software package.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two groups in operation time(P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative pain, facial swelling, mouth opening limitation and complications in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The operation time of extraction with Er:YAG laser is similar to that with turbine handpiece, but laser can reduce postoperative reaction and the incidence of complications, which is easy to be accepted by patients and worthy of wide application.

摘要

目的

比较铒激光与涡轮机在拔除下颌低位水平阻生智齿中的临床效果,评估手术时间、术后疼痛、面部肿胀、张口受限程度及并发症情况。

方法

选取2020年3月至2022年5月临沂市人民医院口腔颌面外科40例双侧下颌水平阻生智齿患者,所有双侧智齿均部分骨埋伏。每位患者双侧智齿分别采用铒激光和涡轮机拔除,根据每侧的去骨方式将患者分为实验组(激光组)和对照组(涡轮机组)。随访1周后比较两组的临床效果。采用SPSS 19.0软件包进行统计学分析。

结果

两组手术时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。实验组术后疼痛、面部肿胀、张口受限及并发症发生率均显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。

结论

铒激光拔牙手术时间与涡轮机相似,但激光可减轻术后反应及并发症发生率,易被患者接受,值得广泛应用。

相似文献

1
[Comparative study on extraction of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth by Er:YAG laser and turbine handpiece].[铒激光与涡轮机手机拔除下颌阻生智齿的对比研究]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2023 Feb;32(1):75-79.
2
[Evaluation of the effect of MTF-S on the removal of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth with complete or partial crown impaction].[评估MTF-S对拔除完全或部分冠部阻生的下颌阻生智齿的效果]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2024 Feb;33(1):71-75.
3
A Clinical Comparison of Er:YAG Laser, Piezosurgery, and Conventional Bur Methods in the Impacted Third Molar Surgery.《Er:YAG 激光、超声骨刀与传统涡轮钻在下颌第三磨牙阻生手术中临床效果比较》
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2023 Jun;41(6):283-290. doi: 10.1089/photob.2022.0142.
4
Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth.下颌智齿拔除的手术技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 29(7):CD004345. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004345.pub2.
5
[Comparative study of complications among routine method,high speed turbine handpiece and piezosurgery device after extraction of impacted wisdom teeth].[常规方法、高速涡轮手机及超声骨刀在拔除下颌阻生智齿后并发症的对比研究]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2012 Apr;21(2):208-10.
6
Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth.下颌智齿拔除的手术技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 26;7(7):CD004345. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004345.pub3.
7
Application of an ultrasonic bone knife combined with a dental electric motor in the extraction of mandibular middle and low impacted teeth.超声骨刀联合牙科电钻在下颌中低位埋伏阻生牙拔除术中的应用
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jan 4;24(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03788-0.
8
[Evaluation of the results of high-speed handpiece and minimally invasive extraction in impacted mandibular third molar extraction].[高速手机与微创拔牙在下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术中的效果评估]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2015 Aug;24(4):489-92.
9
Postoperative evaluation of Er:YAG laser, piezosurgery, and rotary systems used for osteotomy in mandibular third-molar extractions.用于下颌第三磨牙拔除的骨切开术中的 Er:YAG 激光、超声骨刀和旋转系统的术后评估。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2021 Jan;49(1):64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2020.11.010. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
10
Is the Er: YAG Laser Effective in Reducing Pain, Edema, and Trismus After Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars? A Meta-Analysis.铒激光在减少下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术后疼痛、水肿和牙关紧闭方面是否有效?一项荟萃分析。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Mar;80(3):501-516. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
[Expert consensus on standardized clinical applications of minimally invasive tooth extraction techniques].[微创拔牙技术标准化临床应用专家共识]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2024 May 20;44(5):1004-1014. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2024.05.24.