Yuan Zhiyong, Wu Dongyi, Wen Yang, Xu Wei, Gao Wei, Dahn Hollis A, Liu Xiaolong, Jin Jieqiong, Yu Chuanxin, Xiao Heng, Che Jing
Key Laboratory of Freshwater Fish Reproduction and Development (Ministry of Education), School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.
Key Laboratory for Conserving Wildlife with Small Populations in Yunnan, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China.
Curr Zool. 2022 Feb 17;69(1):82-90. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoac010. eCollection 2023 Feb.
Species delimitation is essential to informing conservation policy and understanding ecological and evolutionary processes. Most of our recent gains in knowledge on animal diversity rely on morphological characteristics and mitochondrial (mt) DNA variation. Concordant results based on both have led to an unprecedented acceleration in the identification of new species and enriched the field of taxonomy. However, discordances are also found commonly between morphological and mtDNA evidence. This confounds species delimitation, especially when gene flow or mt genome introgression has occurred. Here, we illustrate how mt genome introgression among species of the complex confounds species delimitation using the combined evidence of morphological characters, mt variation, and thousands of nuclear single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS). Fifty-eight samples across the distribution of the complex were included. The mtDNA matrilineal genealogy indicated 2 clades, with and clustered together. In contrast, all nuclear evidence including gene trees, species trees, and genetic structure analyses based on GBS data support 3 species with distinct genetic clusters. These 3 distinct genetic clusters also correspond to distinct morphological characters. They affirm the distinct taxonomic entities of both and , as well as a third clade distinct from either. Which species the third clade belongs to remains unclear and will require further testing. The nuclear genomic loci contradict the COI evidence, with indications of rampant historical mt genome introgression among the species of the complex. These discordant signals previously confused species delimitation efforts in this group. Based on these findings, we recommend the integration of independent data, especially nuclear genomic evidence, in species delimitation so as to be robust against the pitfalls of mt introgression.
物种界定对于制定保护政策以及理解生态和进化过程至关重要。我们最近在动物多样性知识方面的大部分进展都依赖于形态特征和线粒体(mt)DNA变异。基于这两者的一致结果导致新物种识别的加速达到了前所未有的程度,并丰富了分类学领域。然而,形态学和mtDNA证据之间也普遍存在不一致。这使得物种界定变得复杂,特别是当发生基因流或mt基因组渗入时。在这里,我们利用形态特征、mt变异以及来自简化基因组测序(GBS)的数千个核单核苷酸多态性(SNP)的综合证据,说明了该复合体物种间的mt基因组渗入如何混淆物种界定。纳入了该复合体分布范围内的58个样本。mtDNA母系谱系显示有2个分支,其中[具体物种1]和[具体物种2]聚集在一起。相比之下,所有基于GBS数据的核证据,包括基因树、物种树和遗传结构分析,都支持3个具有不同遗传簇的物种。这3个不同的遗传簇也对应着不同的形态特征。它们证实了[具体物种1]和[具体物种2]以及一个与两者都不同的第三个分支的不同分类实体。第三个分支属于哪个物种仍不清楚,需要进一步测试。核基因组位点与COI证据相矛盾,表明该复合体物种间存在大量历史mt基因组渗入。这些不一致的信号此前混淆了该类群的物种界定工作。基于这些发现,我们建议在物种界定中整合独立数据,特别是核基因组证据,以便在应对mt渗入的陷阱时更加稳健。