Niculescu Dan Alexandru, Gheorghiu Monica Livia, Poiana Catalina
Department of Endocrinology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Department of Pituitary and Neuroendocrine Disorders, C. I. Parhon National Institute of Endocrinology, Bucharest, Romania.
Eur J Endocrinol. 2023 Apr 5;188(4):R88-R97. doi: 10.1093/ejendo/lvad044.
Radiotherapy, conventional or radiosurgery, has been used to control prolactin secretion and tumour growth in prolactinomas both as part of multimodal therapy or rarely as primary treatment. However, considering the radiotherapy side effects, notably hypopituitarism, as opposed to the high efficacy and low toxicity of dopamine agonists (DA) treatment and neurosurgery, radiotherapy is recommended mostly for patients with aggressive or high-risk prolactinomas or in those resistant or intolerant to medical therapy, usually after surgical failure. We provide an overview of the published literature on the efficacy and toxicity of radiotherapy (conventional fractionated or radiosurgery), in aggressive, high-risk, or DA resistant prolactinomas. Radiotherapy has shown a good efficacy and a reasonable toxicity profile in prolactinomas where other treatment modalities failed. In aggressive and high-risk prolactinomas, the cumulative percentage for tumour control (reduction plus stable) ranged from 68% to 100%. Most studies reported global hormonal control rates over 50%. In resistant prolactinomas, the global secretion control rate (on, but also off DA) ranged from 28% to 89%-100%; in most studies over 80%. The 5-year rate of hypopituitarism was around 12%-25%. To date there are no controlled study on the use of radiotherapy as a prophylactic treatment in patients with clinical, radiological or pathological markers of aggressiveness. In conclusion, our review supports the use of radiotherapy in patients with growing, clinically aggressive or truly DA resistant prolactinomas. In patients with high-risk or invasive prolactinomas or in those harboring pathological markers of aggressiveness, the prophylactic use of radiotherapy should be individualized.
放射治疗,无论是传统放疗还是立体定向放射外科治疗,都已被用于控制泌乳素瘤的泌乳素分泌和肿瘤生长,它既可以作为多模式治疗的一部分,也很少作为主要治疗方法。然而,考虑到放疗的副作用,尤其是垂体功能减退,与多巴胺激动剂(DA)治疗和神经外科手术的高效和低毒性相反,放疗主要推荐用于侵袭性或高危泌乳素瘤患者,或对药物治疗耐药或不耐受的患者,通常是在手术失败之后。我们对已发表的关于放疗(传统分次放疗或立体定向放射外科治疗)在侵袭性、高危或对DA耐药的泌乳素瘤中的疗效和毒性的文献进行了综述。在其他治疗方式失败的泌乳素瘤中,放疗已显示出良好的疗效和合理的毒性特征。在侵袭性和高危泌乳素瘤中,肿瘤控制(缩小加稳定)的累积百分比范围为68%至100%。大多数研究报告总体激素控制率超过50%。在耐药泌乳素瘤中,总体分泌控制率(服用DA时以及停药时)范围为28%至89%-100%;在大多数研究中超过80%。垂体功能减退的5年发生率约为12%-25%。迄今为止,尚无关于将放疗作为具有侵袭性临床、放射学或病理学标志物的患者的预防性治疗的对照研究。总之,我们的综述支持在生长性、临床侵袭性或真正对DA耐药的泌乳素瘤患者中使用放疗。对于高危或侵袭性泌乳素瘤患者或具有侵袭性病理学标志物的患者,放疗的预防性使用应个体化。