Department of Integrative Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Ecology. 2023 Jun;104(6):e4042. doi: 10.1002/ecy.4042. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
As 21st-century climate and disturbance dynamics depart from historic baselines, ecosystem resilience is uncertain. Multiple drivers are changing simultaneously, and interactions among drivers could amplify ecosystem vulnerability to change. Subalpine forests in Greater Yellowstone (Northern Rocky Mountains, USA) were historically resilient to infrequent (100-300 year), severe fire. We sampled paired short-interval (<30-year) and long-interval (>125-year) post-fire plots most recently burned between 1988 and 2018 to address two questions: (1) How do short-interval fire, climate, topography, and distance to unburned live forest edge interact to affect post-fire forest regeneration? (2) How do forest biomass and fuels vary following short-interval versus long-interval severe fires? Mean post-fire live tree stem density was an order of magnitude lower following short-interval versus long-interval fires (3240 vs. 28,741 stems ha , respectively). Differences between paired plots were amplified at longer distances to live forest edge. Surprisingly, warmer-drier climate was associated with higher seedling densities even after short-interval fire, likely relating to regional variation in serotiny of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia). Unlike conifers, density of aspen (Populus tremuloides), a deciduous resprouter, increased with short-interval versus long-interval fires (mean 384 vs. 62 stems ha , respectively). Live biomass and canopy fuels remained low nearly 30 years after short-interval fire, in contrast with rapid recovery after long-interval fire, suggesting that future burn severity may be reduced for several decades following reburns. Short-interval plots also had half as much dead woody biomass compared with long-interval plots (60 vs. 121 Mg ha ), primarily due to the absence of large snags. Our results suggest differences in tree regeneration following short-interval versus long-interval fires will be especially pronounced where serotiny was high historically. Propagule limitation will also interact with short-interval fires to diminish tree regeneration but lessen subsequent burn severity. Amplifying driver interactions are likely to threaten forest resilience under expected trajectories of a future fire.
随着 21 世纪气候和干扰动态偏离历史基线,生态系统的弹性是不确定的。多个驱动因素同时发生变化,并且驱动因素之间的相互作用可能会放大生态系统对变化的脆弱性。大黄石地区(美国落矶山脉北部)的亚高山森林历史上能够抵御罕见的(100-300 年)、严重的火灾。我们最近在 1988 年至 2018 年之间采样了最近被烧毁的短间隔(<30 年)和长间隔(>125 年)火灾后样地,以解决两个问题:(1)短间隔火灾、气候、地形和与未燃烧活林缘的距离如何相互作用影响火灾后森林更新?(2)短间隔和长间隔严重火灾后森林生物量和燃料如何变化?与长间隔火灾相比,短间隔火灾后活树茎密度低一个数量级(分别为 3240 株和 28741 株/公顷)。在距离活林缘较长的距离处,样地之间的差异被放大。令人惊讶的是,即使在短间隔火灾后,更温暖和干燥的气候与更高的幼苗密度相关联,这可能与落矶山白松(Pinus contorta var. latifolia)的结实习性的区域变化有关。与针叶树不同,柳树(Populus tremuloides),一种落叶再萌植物的密度随着短间隔和长间隔火灾而增加(分别为 384 株和 62 株/公顷)。与长间隔火灾后迅速恢复相比,短间隔火灾后近 30 年活生物质和冠层燃料仍保持低值,这表明在重新燃烧后,未来的燃烧强度可能在几十年内降低。与长间隔火灾后相比,短间隔火灾后样地的枯木生物质减少了一半(分别为 60 吨和 121 吨/公顷),主要是因为缺乏大型枯立木。我们的结果表明,短间隔和长间隔火灾后树木更新的差异在历史上结实习性较高的地区将特别明显。繁殖体限制也将与短间隔火灾相互作用,减少树木更新,但减轻随后的燃烧强度。驱动因素相互作用的放大可能会威胁到森林的弹性,预计未来的火灾会沿着这样的轨迹发展。