University of Ljubljana, Medical Faculty, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2023 Jun 9;24(2):124-128. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2023.1724. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
The aim was to compare the degree of back symmetry in two groups of subjects with and without pathologic facial asymmetry and to assess any possible associations between face and back asymmetry evaluated on three-dimensional surface face and back scans.
The study design consisted of allocation of 70 subjects (35 females, 35 males) aged 6.4±0.5 years, according to the percentage of whole face symmetry assessed on three-dimensional (3D) facial scans into a 'symmetric' (symG; symmetry ≥70%) and 'asymmetric'(asymG; symmetry <70%). The 3D face and back scans were analysed using colour deviation maps and percentages of symmetry of the whole face and back surfaces as well as their three separate areas: forehead, maxillary and mandibular areas for the face and neck, upper and middle trunk areas for the back, were calculated. Non-parametric statistical tests were used for between-group comparisons (Mann-Whitney U test). Within each group, differences between each face or back area were tested with the Friedman test. Correlations between face and back symmetry were assessed with the Spearman rho coefficient.
The symG exhibited a significantly higher symmetry in each facial area than the asymG. The mandibular area was the least symmetric area of the face within each group, with significantly smaller values than the maxillary area in the symG and significantly smaller values than the forehead and maxillary area in the asymG. The percentage of whole back symmetry did not significantly differ (p>0.05) between the symG ( 82.00% [67.4;88.00]) and asymG (74.3% [66.1;79.6]). The only significant between-group difference was observed for the symmetry of the upper trunk area (p=0.021), with lower symmetry values in the asymG. No significant associations were detected between face and back parameters.
The percentages of symmetry in each facial area were significantly higher among subjects without pathologic facial asymmetry. The most asymmetric area of the face, regardless of the degree of whole face symmetry, was its mandibular area. No significant differences were detected within different back areas; however, subjects with asymmetric faces showed significantly smaller symmetry of their upper trunk area.
比较两组有和无病理面不对称的受试者的背部对称性程度,并评估三维面部和背部扫描对面部和背部不对称性评估的任何可能关联。
根据三维(3D)面部扫描评估的全脸对称性百分比,将 70 名受试者(35 名女性,35 名男性)分配到“对称”(symG;对称性≥70%)和“不对称”(asymG;对称性<70%)组。使用颜色偏差图和全脸面和背面表面以及三个单独区域(额部、上颌和下颌区域)的对称性百分比分析 3D 面部和背部扫描,计算颈、上中躯干区域。使用非参数统计检验进行组间比较(Mann-Whitney U 检验)。在每个组内,使用 Friedman 检验测试每个面部或背部区域之间的差异。使用 Spearman rho 系数评估面部和背部对称性之间的相关性。
symG 的每个面部区域的对称性明显高于 asymG。下颌区域是每个组中最不对称的面部区域,其值明显小于 symG 中的上颌区域,明显小于 asymG 中的额部和上颌区域。全背对称性百分比在 symG(82.00%[67.4;88.00%])和 asymG(74.3%[66.1;79.6%])之间无显著差异(p>0.05)。唯一观察到的组间差异是上躯干区域的对称性(p=0.021),asymG 的对称性较低。未检测到面部和背部参数之间的显著相关性。
无病理面不对称的受试者的每个面部区域的对称性百分比明显更高。无论整个面部的对称性如何,面部最不对称的区域是下颌区域。不同背部区域之间未检测到显著差异;然而,面部不对称的受试者上躯干区域的对称性明显较小。