• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新分配宫颈癌预防服务支出,从低价值临床场景到高价值临床场景。

Reallocating Cervical Cancer Preventive Service Spending from Low- to High-Value Clinical Scenarios.

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia.

出版信息

Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2023 Jul 5;16(7):385-391. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-22-0531.

DOI:10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-22-0531
PMID:36976753
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10320459/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Timely follow-up care after an abnormal cervical cancer screening test result is critical to the prevention and early diagnosis of cervical cancer. The current inadequate and inequitable delivery of these potentially life-saving services is attributed to several factors, including patient out-of-pocket costs. Waiving of consumer cost-sharing for follow-up testing (e.g., colposcopy and related cervical services) is likely to improve access and uptake, especially among underserved populations. One approach to defray the incremental costs of providing more generous coverage for follow-up testing is reducing expenditures on "low-value" cervical cancer screening services. To explore the potential fiscal implications of a policy that redirects cervical cancer screening resources from potentially low- to high-value clinical scenarios, we analyzed 2019 claims from the Virginia All-Payer Claims Database to quantify (i) total spending on low-value cervical cancer screening and (ii) out-of-pocket costs associated with colposcopy and related cervical services among commercially insured Virginians. In a cohort of 1,806,921 female patients (ages 48.1 ± 24.8 years), 295,193 claims for cervical cancer screening were reported, 100,567 (34.0%) of which were determined to be low-value ($4,394,361 total; $4,172,777 for payers and $221,584 out-of-pocket [$2/patient]). Claims for 52,369 colposcopy and related cervical services were reported ($40,994,016 total; $33,457,518 for payers and $7,536,498 out-of-pocket [$144/patient]). These findings suggest that reallocating savings incurred from unnecessary spending to fund more generous coverage of necessary follow-up care is a feasible approach to enhancing cervical cancer prevention equity and outcomes.

PREVENTION RELEVANCE

Out-of-pocket fees are a barrier to follow-up care after an abnormal cervical cancer screening test. Among commercially insured Virginians, out-of-pocket costs for follow-up services averaged $144/patient; 34% of cervical cancer screenings were classified as low value. Reallocating low-value cervical cancer screening expenditures to enhance coverage for follow-up care can improve screening outcomes. See related Spotlight, p. 363.

摘要

目的:及时跟进宫颈癌筛查异常的后续护理对于预防和早期发现宫颈癌至关重要。当前,由于多种因素,包括患者自付费用,这些具有潜在挽救生命的服务的提供不足且不公平。免除后续检测(如阴道镜检查和相关宫颈服务)的消费者自付费用可能会增加服务的可及性和利用率,尤其是在服务不足的人群中。为了减轻提供更慷慨的后续检测服务的增量成本,一种方法是减少对“低价值”宫颈癌筛查服务的支出。为了探索将宫颈癌筛查资源从潜在低价值临床场景重新分配到高价值临床场景的政策的潜在财政影响,我们分析了弗吉尼亚州所有支付者索赔数据库中的 2019 年索赔数据,以量化(i)低价值宫颈癌筛查的总支出,以及(ii)商业投保的弗吉尼亚州女性中与阴道镜检查和相关宫颈服务相关的自付费用。在一个有 1806921 名女性患者(年龄 48.1 ± 24.8 岁)的队列中,报告了 295193 例宫颈癌筛查索赔,其中 100567 例(34.0%)被确定为低价值(总费用为 4394361 美元;33457518 美元由支付方承担,221584 美元由患者自付[每位患者 2 美元])。报告了 52369 例阴道镜检查和相关宫颈服务的索赔(总费用为 40994016 美元;33457518 美元由支付方承担,7536498 美元由患者自付[每位患者 144 美元])。这些发现表明,将不必要支出节省的资金重新分配用于为必要的后续护理提供更慷慨的覆盖范围,是提高宫颈癌预防公平性和结果的可行方法。

预防相关性:自付费用是宫颈癌筛查异常后进行后续护理的障碍。在商业投保的弗吉尼亚州人中,后续护理服务的自付费用平均为每位患者 144 美元;34%的宫颈癌筛查被归类为低价值。重新分配低价值宫颈癌筛查支出以增强后续护理的覆盖范围可以改善筛查结果。参见相关焦点文章,第 363 页。

相似文献

1
Reallocating Cervical Cancer Preventive Service Spending from Low- to High-Value Clinical Scenarios.重新分配宫颈癌预防服务支出,从低价值临床场景到高价值临床场景。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2023 Jul 5;16(7):385-391. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-22-0531.
2
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.英格兰原发性人乳头瘤病毒子宫颈筛查的临床效果和成本效益:通过三轮筛查对 ARTISTIC 随机试验队列进行的扩展随访。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Apr;18(23):1-196. doi: 10.3310/hta18230.
3
Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: Patterns Among Women With Medicaid and Commercial Insurance.乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查:有医疗补助和商业保险的女性中的模式。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Sep;57(3):394-402. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
4
Out-of-pocket cost by cancer stage at diagnosis in commercially insured patients in the United States.美国商业保险患者在诊断时按癌症分期的自付费用。
J Med Econ. 2023 Jan-Dec;26(1):1318-1329. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2254649. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
5
Use Trends and Recent Expenditures for Cervical Cancer Screening-Associated Services in Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries Older Than 65 Years.使用 Medicare 按服务收费受益人的 65 岁以上人群宫颈癌筛查相关服务的趋势和最近支出。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Jan 1;183(1):11-20. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.5261.
6
[Health technology assessment report: Computer-assisted Pap test for cervical cancer screening].[卫生技术评估报告:用于宫颈癌筛查的计算机辅助巴氏试验]
Epidemiol Prev. 2012 Sep-Oct;36(5 Suppl 3):e1-43.
7
Low-Value Prostate-Specific Antigen Test for Prostate Cancer Screening and Subsequent Health Care Utilization and Spending.低价值前列腺特异性抗原检测用于前列腺癌筛查及后续的医疗保健利用和支出。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2243449. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.43449.
8
Optimal Management Strategies for Primary HPV Testing for Cervical Screening: Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation for the National Cervical Screening Program in Australia.宫颈癌筛查中初级人乳头瘤病毒检测的最佳管理策略:澳大利亚国家宫颈癌筛查计划的成本效益评估
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 17;12(1):e0163509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163509. eCollection 2017.
9
The Clinical and Economic Benefits of Co-Testing Versus Primary HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening: A Modeling Analysis.联合检测与单纯人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测用于宫颈癌筛查的临床和经济效益:一项模型分析
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016 Jun;25(6):606-16. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5708. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
10
Chatbot-interfaced and cognitive-affective barrier-driven messages to improve colposcopy adherence after abnormal Pap test results in underserved urban women: A feasibility pilot study.基于聊天机器人界面和认知情感障碍驱动的信息,提高服务不足的城市女性异常巴氏试验结果后的阴道镜检查依从性:一项可行性试点研究。
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Jan 11;14(1):1-12. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad064.

引用本文的文献

1
Cervical cancer screening uptake in Côte d'Ivoire: Analysis of prevalence and associated factors.科特迪瓦宫颈癌筛查情况:患病率及相关因素分析
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):2287. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23103-6.
2
Cancer screening outside of age recommendations: a population-based study.超出年龄建议范围的癌症筛查:一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 6;25(1):1660. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22848-4.
3
Utilization and outcomes of serial cervical cancer screening in a National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) in a non-Medicaid expansion state.在一个非医疗补助扩大州的国家乳腺癌和宫颈癌早期检测项目(NBCCEDP)中,连续宫颈癌筛查的利用情况及结果
Cancer Causes Control. 2025 Apr;36(4):409-420. doi: 10.1007/s10552-024-01948-3. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
4
Increased spending on low-value care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Virginia.弗吉尼亚州在新冠疫情期间低价值医疗支出增加。
Health Aff Sch. 2024 Oct 23;2(11):qxae133. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae133. eCollection 2024 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Low-Value Prostate-Specific Antigen Test for Prostate Cancer Screening and Subsequent Health Care Utilization and Spending.低价值前列腺特异性抗原检测用于前列腺癌筛查及后续的医疗保健利用和支出。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2243449. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.43449.
2
Use Trends and Recent Expenditures for Cervical Cancer Screening-Associated Services in Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries Older Than 65 Years.使用 Medicare 按服务收费受益人的 65 岁以上人群宫颈癌筛查相关服务的趋势和最近支出。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Jan 1;183(1):11-20. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.5261.
3
Rates of Routine Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Before vs After the COVID-19 Pandemic.2019冠状病毒病大流行之前与之后的常规癌症筛查和诊断率。
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Jan 1;9(1):145-146. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.5481.
4
Comparison of Screening Colonoscopy Rates After Positive Noninvasive Testing for Colorectal Cancer in States With and Without Cost-Sharing.比较有和没有费用分担的州在结直肠癌非侵入性检测阳性后进行筛查结肠镜检查的比率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2216910. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.16910.
5
Out-of-Pocket Costs for Colposcopy Among Commercially Insured Women From 2006 to 2019.2006 年至 2019 年商业保险女性行阴道镜检查的自付费用。
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jan 1;139(1):113-115. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004582.
6
Low-Value Care at the Actionable Level of Individual Health Systems.个体卫生系统行动层面的低价值医疗
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Nov 1;181(11):1490-1500. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.5531.
7
The Impact of Choosing Wisely Interventions on Low-Value Medical Services: A Systematic Review.明智选择干预措施对低价值医疗服务的影响:系统评价。
Milbank Q. 2021 Dec;99(4):1024-1058. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12531. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
8
Utilization Impact of Cost-Sharing Elimination for Preventive Care Services: A Rapid Review.消除预防性保健服务费用分担的利用影响:快速综述
Med Care Res Rev. 2022 Apr;79(2):175-197. doi: 10.1177/10775587211027372. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
9
Out-of-pocket costs for preventive care persist almost a decade after the Affordable Care Act.可负担医疗法案通过近十年后,预防保健的自付费用仍然存在。
Prev Med. 2021 Sep;150:106690. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106690. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
10
Overuse of Cervical Cancer Screening Tests Among Women With Average Risk in the United States From 2013 to 2014.美国 2013-2014 年一般风险女性中过度使用宫颈癌筛查检测的情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e218373. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8373.