• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Association of Occupational Exposures and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Morbidity.职业暴露与慢性阻塞性肺疾病发病相关性的研究。
J Occup Environ Med. 2023 Jul 1;65(7):e443-e452. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002850. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
2
Occupational exposure to dusts, gases, and fumes and incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the Swiss Cohort Study on Air Pollution and Lung and Heart Diseases in Adults.职业性接触粉尘、气体和烟雾与瑞士成年人空气污染与肺部和心脏疾病队列研究中慢性阻塞性肺疾病的发病关系。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Jun 15;185(12):1292-300. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201110-1917OC. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
3
Occupational diesel exhaust exposure as a risk factor for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.职业性柴油废气暴露与慢性阻塞性肺疾病的关系。
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2012 Mar;18(2):151-4. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e32834f0eaa.
4
Effect of occupational exposure to vapors, gases, dusts, and fumes on COPD mortality risk among Swedish construction workers: a longitudinal cohort study.职业性接触蒸气、气体、粉尘和烟雾对瑞典建筑工人 COPD 死亡率的影响:一项纵向队列研究。
Chest. 2014 May;145(5):992-997. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-1429.
5
The occupational burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的职业负担
Eur Respir J. 2003 Sep;22(3):462-9. doi: 10.1183/09031936.03.00094203.
6
Prevalence and risk factors of COPD among never-smokers in two areas of Sweden - Occupational exposure to gas, dust or fumes is an important risk factor.瑞典两个地区非吸烟者中慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的患病率及危险因素——职业性接触气体、粉尘或烟雾是一个重要的危险因素。
Respir Med. 2015 Nov;109(11):1439-45. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2015.09.012. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
7
Occupational exposures and the risk of COPD: dusty trades revisited.职业暴露与慢性阻塞性肺疾病风险:再谈粉尘行业
Thorax. 2009 Jan;64(1):6-12. doi: 10.1136/thx.2008.099390. Epub 2008 Aug 4.
8
Occupational exposure and risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.职业暴露与慢性阻塞性肺疾病风险:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2016 Aug;10(8):861-72. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2016.1190274. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
9
COPD and occupational exposures: a case-control study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病与职业暴露:一项病例对照研究。
J Occup Environ Med. 2008 May;50(5):561-9. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181651556.
10
Secondhand Tobacco Smoke and COPD Risk in Smokers: A COPDGene Study Cohort Subgroup Analysis.吸烟者中的二手烟草烟雾与慢性阻塞性肺疾病风险:一项慢性阻塞性肺疾病基因研究队列亚组分析
COPD. 2015 Apr;12(2):182-9. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2014.922173. Epub 2014 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Global, regional, and national temporal trends in prevalence, deaths and disability-adjusted life years for chronic pulmonary disease, 1990-2021: an age-period-cohort analysis based on the global burden of disease study 2021.1990 - 2021年慢性肺病患病率、死亡人数及伤残调整生命年的全球、区域和国家时间趋势:基于2021年全球疾病负担研究的年龄 - 时期 - 队列分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Mar 4;12:1554442. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1554442. eCollection 2025.

职业暴露与慢性阻塞性肺疾病发病相关性的研究。

Association of Occupational Exposures and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Morbidity.

机构信息

From the Region VIII, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Department of Labor, Denver, Colorado (J.S.R.); Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland (J.S.R., P.S.J.L., K.K., J.P.B., L.Q.-A.); Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.K.H., W.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa (E.A.H.); Department of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York (R.G.B.); Department of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (S.P.P.); Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (R.P., C.P., R.E.K.); Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (C.B.C.); Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama (M.T.D..); Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa (A.P.C.); Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (M.B.D.); Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (N.P., N.N.H.); and Department of Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center/Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire (L.M.P.).

出版信息

J Occup Environ Med. 2023 Jul 1;65(7):e443-e452. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002850. Epub 2023 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1097/JOM.0000000000002850
PMID:36977360
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10330008/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to determine whether aggregate measures of occupational exposures are associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) outcomes in the Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcome Measures in COPD study cohort.

METHODS

Individuals were assigned to six predetermined exposure hazard categories based on self-reported employment history. Multivariable regression, adjusted for age, sex, race, current smoking status, and smoking pack-years determined the association of such exposures to odds of COPD and morbidity measures. We compared these with the results of a single summary question regarding occupational exposure.

RESULTS

A total of 2772 individuals were included. Some exposure estimates, including "gases and vapors" and "dust and fumes" exposures resulted in associations with effect estimates over two times the estimated effect size when compared with a single summary question.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of occupational hazard categories can identify important associations with COPD morbidity while use of single-point measures may underestimate important differences in health risks.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定职业暴露综合指标是否与 COPD 亚群和 COPD 研究队列中中间结局指标研究中的 COPD 结局相关。

方法

根据自我报告的就业史,将个体分配到六个预先确定的暴露危险类别。多变量回归,调整年龄、性别、种族、当前吸烟状况和吸烟包年数,确定这些暴露与 COPD 和发病几率的相关性。我们将这些结果与一个关于职业暴露的单一综合问题的结果进行了比较。

结果

共纳入 2772 人。一些暴露估计,包括“气体和蒸气”和“粉尘和烟雾”暴露,与单一综合问题相比,其估计效应值的两倍以上的效应估计值具有相关性。

结论

使用职业危害类别可以确定与 COPD 发病几率的重要相关性,而使用单点测量可能会低估健康风险的重要差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a5/10330008/ebd001ae9d88/nihms-1884259-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a5/10330008/d13e47b51a6b/nihms-1884259-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a5/10330008/ebd001ae9d88/nihms-1884259-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a5/10330008/d13e47b51a6b/nihms-1884259-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a5/10330008/ebd001ae9d88/nihms-1884259-f0003.jpg