Suppr超能文献

系统发生基因组学将分子数据与有关活海龟起源的丰富化石记录相协调。

Phylogenomics reconciles molecular data with the rich fossil record on the origin of living turtles.

机构信息

Laboratório de Biologia e Genômica Evolutiva, Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Genética, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Genética, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2023 Jun;183:107773. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2023.107773. Epub 2023 Mar 26.

Abstract

Although a consensus exists that all living turtles fall within either Pleurodira or Cryptodira clades, estimating when these lineages split is still under debate. Most molecular studies date the split in the Triassic Period, whereas a Jurassic age is unanimous among morphological studies. Each hypothesis implies different paleobiogeographical scenarios to explain early turtle evolution. Here we explored the rich turtle fossil record with the Fossilized Birth-Death (FBD) and the traditional node dating (ND) methods using complete mitochondrial genomes (147 taxa) and a set of nuclear orthologs with over 10 million bp (25 taxa) to date the major splits in Testudines. Our results support an Early Jurassic split (191-182 Ma) for the crown Testudines with great consistency across different dating methods and datasets, with a narrow confidence interval. This result is independently supported by the oldest fossils of Testudines that postdate the Middle Jurassic (174 Ma), which were not used for calibration in this study. This age coincides with the Pangaea fragmentation and the formation of saltwater barriers such as the Atlantic Ocean and the Turgai Strait, supporting that diversification in Testudines was triggered by vicariance. Our ages of the splits in Pleurodira coincide with the geologic events of the Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous. Conversely, the early Cryptodira radiation remained in Laurasia, and its diversification ensued as all its major lineages expanded their distribution into every continent during the Cenozoic. We provide the first detailed hypothesis of the evolution of Cryptodira in the Southern Hemisphere, in which our time estimates are correlated with each contact between landmasses derived from Gondwana and Laurasia. Although most South American Cryptodira arrived through the Great American Biotic Interchange, our results indicate that the Chelonoidis ancestor probably arrived from Africa through the chain islands of the South Atlantic during the Paleogene. Together, the presence of ancient turtle diversity and the vital role that turtles occupy in marine and terrestrial ecosystems underline South America as a chief area for conservation.

摘要

虽然人们普遍认为所有活海龟都属于侧颈龟亚目或隐颈龟亚目,但这些谱系何时分裂仍存在争议。大多数分子研究将其定在三叠纪,而形态研究则一致认为是侏罗纪。每个假说都暗示了不同的古生物地理情景来解释早期海龟的进化。在这里,我们使用完整的线粒体基因组(147 个分类群)和一组超过 1000 万个碱基对的核同源物(25 个分类群),通过化石出生-死亡(FBD)和传统节点定年(ND)方法,探索了丰富的海龟化石记录,以确定龟鳖目的主要分支。我们的结果支持了一个早侏罗世的分裂(191-182Ma),用于龟鳖目的冠群,不同的定年方法和数据集都具有很高的一致性,置信区间很窄。这一结果得到了最早的龟鳖类化石的独立支持,这些化石的年代晚于中侏罗世(174Ma),而这些化石在本研究中并未用于校准。这个年龄与泛大陆分裂以及咸水屏障(如大西洋和图尔盖海峡)的形成相吻合,表明龟鳖目的多样化是由地理隔离引起的。我们在侧颈龟亚目的分支年龄与晚侏罗世和早白垩世的地质事件相吻合。相反,早期隐颈龟的辐射仍然在劳亚古陆,随着所有主要谱系在新生代扩展到每个大陆,其多样性也随之增加。我们提供了隐颈龟在南半球进化的第一个详细假说,我们的时间估计与从冈瓦纳大陆和劳亚古陆衍生的陆地之间的每次接触都相关。尽管大多数南美洲隐颈龟是通过大美洲生物交换到达的,但我们的结果表明,Chelonoidis 的祖先可能是在古近纪时期从非洲通过南大西洋的链式岛屿到达的。总的来说,古老的海龟多样性的存在以及海龟在海洋和陆地生态系统中所扮演的重要角色,突显了南美洲作为保护的主要地区的地位。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验