Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Legal and Compliance, Psychiatric Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 28;23(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04692-1.
Disruptive and aggressive behavior is frequent in patients with a psychotic disorder; furthermore, it is a recurrent reason for compulsory admission. Even during treatment, many patients continue to show aggressive behavior. Antipsychotic medication is posed to have anti-aggressive properties; its prescription is a common strategy for the treatment (and prevention) of violent behavior. The present study aims to investigate the relation between the antipsychotic class, according to the dopamine D2-Receptor binding affinity (i.e., "loose" - "tight binding"), and aggressive events perpetrated by hospitalized patients with a psychotic disorder.
We conducted a four-year retrospective analysis of legally liable aggressive incidents perpetrated by patients during hospitalization. We extracted patients' basic demographic and clinical data from electronic health records. We used the Staff Observation Aggression Scale (SOAS-R) to grade the severity of an event. Differences between patients with a "loose" or "tight-binding" antipsychotic were analyzed.
In the observation period, there were 17,901 direct admissions; and 61 severe aggressive events (an incidence of 0.85 for every 1,000 admissions year). Patients with a psychotic disorder perpetrated 51 events (incidence of 2.90 for every 1,000 admission year), with an OR of 15.85 (CI: 8.04-31.25) compared to non-psychotic patients. We could identify 46 events conducted by patients with a psychotic disorder under medication. The mean SOAS-R total score was 17.02 (2.74). The majority of victims in the "loose-binding" group were staff members (73.1%, n = 19), while the majority of victims in the "tight-binding" group were fellow patients (65.0%, n = 13); (X(3,46) = 19.687; p < 0.001). There were no demographic or clinical differences between the groups and no differences regarding dose equivalents or other prescribed medication.
In aggressive behaviors conducted by patients with a psychotic disorder under antipsychotic medication, the dopamine D2-Receptor affinity seems to have a high impact on the target of aggression. However, more studies are needed to investigate the anti-aggressive effects of individual antipsychotic agents.
精神障碍患者经常出现破坏性行为和攻击行为;此外,这也是强制入院的一个常见原因。即使在治疗过程中,许多患者仍继续表现出攻击行为。抗精神病药物具有抗攻击作用;其处方是治疗(和预防)暴力行为的常用策略。本研究旨在调查根据多巴胺 D2 受体结合亲和力(即“松散” - “紧密结合”)划分的抗精神病药物类别与住院精神障碍患者实施的攻击事件之间的关系。
我们对住院期间实施合法攻击行为的患者进行了为期四年的回顾性分析。我们从电子健康记录中提取患者的基本人口统计学和临床数据。我们使用工作人员观察攻击量表(SOAS-R)对事件的严重程度进行分级。分析了具有“松散”或“紧密结合”抗精神病药物的患者之间的差异。
在观察期内,共有 17901 次直接入院;有 61 次严重攻击事件(每 1000 次入院年发生率为 0.85)。患有精神障碍的患者实施了 51 次攻击事件(每 1000 次入院年发生率为 2.90),与非精神病患者相比,其比值比为 15.85(95%置信区间:8.04-31.25)。我们可以识别出 46 名正在接受药物治疗的患有精神障碍的患者实施的 46 次攻击事件。SOAS-R 总分平均值为 17.02(2.74)。“松散结合”组的大多数受害者是工作人员(73.1%,n=19),而“紧密结合”组的大多数受害者是同病房的患者(65.0%,n=13);(X(3,46)=19.687;p<0.001)。两组之间在人口统计学或临床方面没有差异,药物剂量当量或其他处方药物也没有差异。
在接受抗精神病药物治疗的精神障碍患者实施的攻击行为中,多巴胺 D2 受体亲和力似乎对攻击目标有很大影响。但是,需要进一步研究以调查个别抗精神病药物的抗攻击作用。