文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

比较新型植入物机器人手术和动态导航系统在牙科植入手术中的准确性:一项体外初步研究。

Comparison the accuracy of a novel implant robot surgery and dynamic navigation system in dental implant surgery: an in vitro pilot study.

机构信息

Center for Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Stomatology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Department of Stomatology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2023 Mar 28;23(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02873-8.


DOI:10.1186/s12903-023-02873-8
PMID:36978064
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10052843/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare the accuracy of dental implant placement using a novel dental implant robotic system (THETA) and a dynamic navigation system (Yizhimei) by a vitro model experiment. METHODS: 10 partially edentulous jaws models were included in this study, and 20 sites were randomly assigned into two groups: the dental implant robotic system (THETA) group and a dynamic navigation system (Yizhimei) group. 20 implants were placed in the defects according to each manufacturer's protocol respectively. The implant platform, apex and angle deviations were measured by fusion of the preoperative design and the actual postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) using 3D Slicer software. Data were analyzed by t - test and Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 20 implants were placed in 10 phantoms. The comparison deviation of implant platform, apex and angulation in THETA group were 0.58 ± 0.31 mm, 0.69 ± 0.28 mm, and 1.08 ± 0.66 respectively, while in Yizhimei group, the comparison deviation of implant platform, apex and angulation were 0.73 ± 0.20 mm, 0.86 ± 0.33 mm, and 2.32 ± 0.71 respectively. The angulation deviation in THETA group was significantly smaller than the Yizhimei group, and there was no significant difference in the deviation of the platform and apex of the implants placed using THETA and Yizhimei, respectively. CONCLUSION: The implant positioning accuracy of the robotic system, especially the angular deviation was superior to that of the dynamic navigation system, suggesting that the THETA robotic system could be a promising tool in dental implant surgery in the future. Further clinical studies are needed to evaluate the current results.

摘要

背景:通过体外模型实验比较新型牙科植入物机器人系统(THETA)和动态导航系统(Yizhimei)在牙科植入物放置中的准确性。

方法:本研究纳入 10 个部分缺牙颌模型,20 个位点随机分为两组:牙科植入物机器人系统(THETA)组和动态导航系统(Yizhimei)组。根据各制造商的方案,分别在缺陷部位植入 20 个种植体。使用 3D Slicer 软件融合术前设计和实际术后锥形束 CT(CBCT),测量种植体平台、根尖和角度偏差。采用 t 检验和 Mann-Whitney U 检验进行数据分析,p<0.05 为统计学差异。

结果:总共在 10 个模型中放置了 20 个种植体。THETA 组种植体平台、根尖和角度偏差的比较偏差分别为 0.58±0.31mm、0.69±0.28mm 和 1.08±0.66mm,而 Yizhimei 组分别为 0.73±0.20mm、0.86±0.33mm 和 2.32±0.71mm。THETA 组的角度偏差明显小于 Yizhimei 组,而使用 THETA 和 Yizhimei 植入物的平台和根尖偏差无显著差异。

结论:机器人系统的种植体定位精度,特别是角度偏差优于动态导航系统,提示 THETA 机器人系统未来可能成为牙科种植手术的一种有前途的工具。需要进一步的临床研究来评估当前的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb8/10052843/12f616288692/12903_2023_2873_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb8/10052843/6cd61ee35730/12903_2023_2873_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb8/10052843/ebe6d75a8621/12903_2023_2873_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb8/10052843/0373de39dddb/12903_2023_2873_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb8/10052843/60126e4c680f/12903_2023_2873_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb8/10052843/00ce1062a269/12903_2023_2873_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb8/10052843/12f616288692/12903_2023_2873_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb8/10052843/6cd61ee35730/12903_2023_2873_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb8/10052843/ebe6d75a8621/12903_2023_2873_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb8/10052843/0373de39dddb/12903_2023_2873_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb8/10052843/60126e4c680f/12903_2023_2873_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb8/10052843/00ce1062a269/12903_2023_2873_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb8/10052843/12f616288692/12903_2023_2873_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Comparison the accuracy of a novel implant robot surgery and dynamic navigation system in dental implant surgery: an in vitro pilot study.

BMC Oral Health. 2023-3-28

[2]
Accuracy of dental implant surgery using dynamic navigation and robotic systems: An in vitro study.

J Dent. 2022-8

[3]
Accuracy of the Yakebot dental implant robotic system versus fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery template in edentulous jaw implantation: A preliminary clinical study.

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024-4

[4]
In vitro and in vivo accuracy of autonomous robotic vs. fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery.

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024-4

[5]
Accuracy and safety of a haptic operated and machine vision controlled collaborative robot for dental implant placement: A translational study.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023-8

[6]
Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019

[7]
Accuracy of 3 calibration methods of computer-assisted dynamic navigation for implant placement: An in vitro study.

J Prosthet Dent. 2024-4

[8]
Dynamic navigation for dental implant placement in single-tooth gaps: A preclinical pilot investigation.

J Dent. 2022-10

[9]
Accuracy of implant placement via dynamic navigation and autonomous robotic computer-assisted implant surgery methods: A retrospective study.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024-2

[10]
A retrospective study of dynamic navigation system-assisted implant placement.

BMC Oral Health. 2023-10-14

引用本文的文献

[1]
Robot-assisted extraction of impacted mandibular tooth: a clinical report.

BMC Oral Health. 2025-5-10

[2]
Evaluation of accuracy and membrane perforation in robotic-assisted implant surgery for transalveolar sinus floor elevation: a retrospective case series.

BMC Oral Health. 2025-4-3

[3]
Accuracy of a Novel Robot-Assisted System and Dynamic Navigation System for Dental Implant Placement: A Clinical Retrospective Study.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025-2-15

[4]
Effect of Bone Microstructure Derived From CBCT on the Accuracy of Robot-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Retrospective Study.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025-6

[5]
Dynamic Navigation in Dental Implantology.

Discoveries (Craiova). 2023-12-31

[6]
Dental implant placement accuracy with robotic surgery compared to free-hand, static and dynamic computer assisted techniques: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2025

[7]
Accuracy of robot-assisted implant surgery versus freehand placement: a retrospective clinical study.

Int J Implant Dent. 2025-1-3

[8]
A Vision-Guided Robotic System for Safe Dental Implant Surgery.

J Clin Med. 2024-10-23

[9]
Accuracy of robotic-assisted surgery for immediate implant placement in posterior teeth: a retrospective case series.

BMC Oral Health. 2024-10-22

[10]
Comparative analysis of dental implant placement accuracy: Semi-active robotic versus free-hand techniques: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024-12

本文引用的文献

[1]
Accuracy of partially and fully guided surgical techniques for immediate implant placement: An in vitro assessment.

J Prosthet Dent. 2023-2

[2]
Accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implants.

Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022-10-25

[3]
Evaluation of a custom-designed human-robot collaboration control system for dental implant robot.

Int J Med Robot. 2022-2

[4]
An image-guided hybrid robot system for dental implant surgery.

Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2022-1

[5]
Accuracy of Implant Placement Position Using Nondental Open-Source Software: An In Vitro Study.

J Prosthodont. 2020-6-17

[6]
Preservation of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Using the Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020-5

[7]
Robotic-Assisted Prosthetically Driven Planning and Immediate Placement of a Dental Implant.

Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2020-1

[8]
Accuracy of dental implant placement via dynamic navigation or the freehand method: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019-12-29

[9]
Pilot study of a surgical robot system for zygomatic implant placement.

Med Eng Phys. 2020-1

[10]
The influence of dental experience on a dental implant navigation system.

BMC Oral Health. 2019-10-17

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索